Suppr超能文献

基于修复效率和经济效益的不同间作修复模式的潜力评价——以砷污染土壤为例。

Potential evaluation of different intercropping remediation modes based on remediation efficiency and economic benefits - a case study of arsenic-contaminated soil.

机构信息

Center for Environmental Remediation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Phytoremediation. 2022;24(1):25-33. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2021.1920571. Epub 2021 May 12.

Abstract

Hyperaccumulator-cash crop intercropping remediation is a research hotspot for heavy metal contaminated farmland, but few studies evaluated its feasibility based on practice. Field experiments and survey statistics were conducted to obtain parameters of / intercropping, and potential of intercropping remediation was evaluated based on remediation efficiency and economic benefits. The results showed that intercropping hyperaccumulator with cash crop (especially herbs) had a certain negative effect on remediation efficiency because of the influence on planting density and harvest times of hyperaccumulator; while trees could partly alleviate this effect. Until achieving the predetermined target, the net remediation cost of was 18.2 $/g As, followed by monoculture (13.3 $/g) and (8.6 $/g). Based on the proposed evaluation model, nealy half of the intercropping modes had low economic benefits, insufficient to compensate the cost of sacrificing remediation efficiency. Based on the data from two soil remediation projects, when net income of cash crops intercropped with As-hyperaccumulators exceeded 5865/1607 $/hm (herbs/trees), the economic benefit of intercropping will be relatively obvious. Therefore, cash crops should be considered from three aspects: planting conditions, spatial allocation and economic benefits. This work analyzed remediation efficiency and economic benefits of intercropping remediation. An economic benefit evaluation model was established to evaluate intercropping remediation modes. The selection principle and net income threshold of cash crops in intercropping was put forward for the first time.[Figure: see text]HighlightsThe selection principle of cash crops in intercropping remediation was put forward.An evaluation model of intercropping remediation was established.The net cost of extracting 1.0 g of soil As in each remediation mode was proposed.Net income of herb/tree intercropped with should exceed 5865/1607 $/hm.

摘要

超富集植物-经济作物间作对重金属污染农田修复是一个研究热点,但基于实践评估其可行性的研究较少。通过田间试验和调查统计获取间作参数,基于修复效率和经济效益评估间作修复的潜力。结果表明,由于超富集植物种植密度和收获次数的影响,间作超富集植物与经济作物(尤其是草本植物)对修复效率有一定的负面影响;而树木可以部分缓解这种影响。在达到预定目标之前, 的净修复成本为 18.2 美元/克 As,其次是 单作(13.3 美元/克)和 (8.6 美元/克)。基于提出的评价模型,近一半的 间作模式经济效益较低,不足以弥补牺牲修复效率的成本。基于两个土壤修复项目的数据,当超富集砷的经济作物间作的净收入超过 5865/1607 美元/公顷(草本植物/树木)时,间作的经济效益将相对明显。因此,应从种植条件、空间配置和经济效益三个方面考虑经济作物。本研究分析了间作修复的修复效率和经济效益,建立了经济效益评价模型,首次提出了间作修复模式的选择原则和净收入阈值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验