Court rules cells are the patient's property.
作者信息
Crawford M
出版信息
Science. 1988 Aug 5;241(4866):653-4. doi: 10.1126/science.3399896.
PMID:3399896
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Court rules cells are the patient's property.法院裁定细胞是患者的财产。
Science. 1988 Aug 5;241(4866):653-4. doi: 10.1126/science.3399896.
2
Rights, duties, and commercial interests: John Moore versus the regents of the University of California.权利、义务与商业利益：约翰·摩尔诉加利福尼亚大学董事会案
Cancer Invest. 1990;8(1):65-70. doi: 10.3109/07357909009017548.
3
Moore v. The Regents of the University of California: an ethical debate on informed consent and property rights in a patient's cells.摩尔诉加利福尼亚大学董事会案：关于患者细胞知情同意权和财产权的伦理辩论
J Pat Trademark Off Soc. 1995 Aug;77(8):611-39.
4
A Seattle man vents his spleen against those who would use it for profit.一名西雅图男子对那些想利用脾脏牟利的人表示愤慨。
People (Chicago). 1985 Sep 23;23(13):97, 100.
5
Moore v. Regents of the University of California.摩尔诉加利福尼亚大学董事会案
Wests Calif Report. 1988 Jul 21;249:494-540.
6
Cells for sale.细胞出售。
Discover. 1988 Aug;9(8):33-9.
7
A disputed spleen.一个有争议的脾脏。
Lancet. 1988 Nov 12;2(8620):1151-2. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90581-8.
8
Controlling conflicts of interest in the doctor-patient relationship: lessons from Moore v. Regents of the University of California.管控医患关系中的利益冲突：源自摩尔诉加利福尼亚大学董事会案的教训
Mercer Law Rev. 1991 Spring;42(3):989-1005.
9
Recognizing property interests in bodily tissues. A need for legislative guidance.
J Leg Med. 1989 Jun;10(2):357-75. doi: 10.1080/01947648909513576.
10
Ruling renews fears of limits on research.
N Y Times Web. 1988 Jul 24:19.
Zotero 插件