Suppr超能文献

监狱内开展的远程医疗的影响和结果:系统评价。

The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review.

机构信息

Allied Health and Human Performance Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Spinal Assessment Clinic, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 17;16(5):e0251840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251840. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While the delivery of healthcare services within prison systems is underpinned by different models, access to timely and optimal healthcare is often constrained by multifaceted factors. Telehealth has been used as an alternative approach to conventional care. To date, much of the focus has been on evaluation of telehealth interventions within certain geographical contexts such as rural and remote communities. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence base to date for the impacts of, and outcomes from, telehealth delivered in prisons.

METHODS

This systematic review was underpinned by best practice in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. A systematic search was conducted to reinforce the literature selection process. The modified McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A narrative synthesis of the study outcomes was undertaken.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine quantitative studies were included. Telehealth interventions were greatly varied in terms of types of healthcare services, implementation process and intervention parameters. Methodological concerns such as rigour in data collection and analysis, and psychometric properties of outcome measures were commonly identified. Process-related outcomes and telehealth outcomes were the two overarching categories identified.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides mixed evidence on the impact of, and outcomes from, telehealth in prisons. While the evidence base does highlight some positive impacts of telehealth, which at the least, is as effective as conventional care while achieving patient satisfaction, it is also important to consider the local context and drivers that may influence what, when and how telehealth services are provided. Addressing critical factors throughout the lifecycle of telehealth is equally important for successful implementation and sustainability.

摘要

背景

尽管监狱系统中的医疗服务提供方式存在不同模式,但及时获得最佳医疗服务往往受到多方面因素的限制。远程医疗已被用作常规护理的替代方法。迄今为止,大多数研究重点都集中在评估农村和偏远社区等特定地理环境中的远程医疗干预措施。因此,本系统评价的目的是综合迄今为止关于监狱中提供的远程医疗的影响和结果的证据基础。

方法

本系统评价以系统评价的实施和报告的最佳实践为基础。进行了系统搜索以加强文献选择过程。使用经过修改的麦克马斯特批判性评估工具来评估纳入研究的方法学质量。对研究结果进行了叙述性综合。

结果

共纳入 29 项定量研究。远程医疗干预在医疗服务类型、实施过程和干预参数方面差异很大。通常会发现数据收集和分析的严谨性以及结果衡量标准的心理测量特性等方法学问题。确定了两个总体类别:过程相关结果和远程医疗结果。

结论

本系统评价提供了关于监狱中远程医疗的影响和结果的混合证据。虽然证据基础确实强调了远程医疗的一些积极影响,至少在实现患者满意度的同时与常规护理一样有效,但同样重要的是要考虑可能影响远程医疗服务提供的时间、方式和地点的当地背景和驱动因素。在远程医疗的整个生命周期中解决关键因素对于成功实施和可持续性同样重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3741/8128277/a5cbc450f177/pone.0251840.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验