Whitlock Elizabeth L, Diaz-Ramirez L Grisell, Smith Alexander K, Boscardin W John, Covinsky Kenneth E, Avidan Michael S, Glymour M Maria
Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco.
Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1955-1964. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.5150.
It is uncertain whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with cognitive decline in older adults compared with a nonsurgical method of coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]).
To compare the change in the rate of memory decline after CABG vs PCI.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of community-dwelling participants in the Health and Retirement Study, who underwent CABG or PCI between 1998 and 2015 at age 65 years or older. Data were modeled for up to 5 years preceding and 10 years following revascularization or until death, drop out, or the 2016-2017 interview wave. The date of final follow-up was November 2017.
CABG (including on and off pump) or PCI, ascertained from Medicare fee-for-service billing records.
The primary outcome was a summary measure of cognitive test scores and proxy cognition reports that were performed biennially in the Health and Retirement Study, referred to as memory score, normalized as a z score (ie, mean of 0, SD of 1 in a reference population of adults aged ≥72 years). Memory score was analyzed using multivariable linear mixed-effects models, with a prespecified subgroup analysis of on-pump and off-pump CABG. The minimum clinically important difference was a change of 1 SD of the population-level rate of memory decline (0.048 memory units/y).
Of 1680 participants (mean age at procedure, 75 years; 41% female), 665 underwent CABG (168 off pump) and 1015 underwent PCI. In the PCI group, the mean rate of memory decline was 0.064 memory units/y (95% CI, 0.052 to 0.078) before the procedure and 0.060 memory units/y (95% CI, 0.048 to 0.071) after the procedure (within-group change, 0.004 memory units/y [95% CI, -0.010 to 0.018]). In the CABG group, the mean rate of memory decline was 0.049 memory units/y (95% CI, 0.033 to 0.065) before the procedure and 0.059 memory units/y (95% CI, 0.047 to 0.072) after the procedure (within-group change, -0.011 memory units/y [95% CI, -0.029 to 0.008]). The between-group difference-in-differences estimate for memory decline for PCI vs CABG was 0.015 memory units/y (95% CI, -0.008 to 0.038; P = .21). There was statistically significant increase in the rate of memory decline after off-pump CABG compared with after PCI (difference-in-differences: mean increase in the rate of decline of 0.046 memory units/y [95% CI, 0.008 to 0.084] after off-pump CABG), but not after on-pump CABG compared with PCI (difference-in-differences: mean slowing of decline of 0.003 memory units/y [95% CI, -0.024 to 0.031] after on-pump CABG).
Among older adults undergoing coronary revascularization with CABG or PCI, the type of revascularization procedure was not significantly associated with differences in the change of rate of memory decline.
与非手术冠状动脉血运重建方法(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗[PCI])相比,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是否会导致老年人认知能力下降尚不确定。
比较CABG与PCI后记忆衰退率的变化。
设计、地点和参与者:对健康与退休研究中社区居住参与者进行的回顾性队列研究,这些参与者于1998年至2015年期间65岁及以上接受了CABG或PCI。对血运重建前长达5年和血运重建后长达10年的数据进行建模,直至死亡、退出或2016 - 2017年访谈波次。最终随访日期为2017年11月。
从医疗保险按服务收费账单记录中确定的CABG(包括体外循环和非体外循环)或PCI。
主要结局是健康与退休研究中每两年进行一次的认知测试分数和代理认知报告的综合测量指标,称为记忆分数,标准化为z分数(即在年龄≥7岁成年人的参考人群中均值为0,标准差为1)。使用多变量线性混合效应模型分析记忆分数,并对体外循环和非体外循环CABG进行预先指定的亚组分析。最小临床重要差异是人群水平记忆衰退率变化1个标准差(0.048记忆单位/年)。
在1680名参与者中(手术时平均年龄75岁;41%为女性),665人接受了CABG(168例非体外循环),1015人接受了PCI。在PCI组中,手术前记忆衰退的平均速率为0.064记忆单位/年(95%置信区间,0.052至0.078),手术后为0.060记忆单位/年(95%置信区间,0.048至0.071)(组内变化,0.004记忆单位/年[95%置信区间,-0.010至0.018])。在CABG组中,手术前记忆衰退的平均速率为0.049记忆单位/年(95%置信区间,0.033至0.065),手术后为0.059记忆单位/年(95%置信区间,0.047至0.072)(组内变化,-0.011记忆单位/年[95%置信区间,-0.029至0.008])。PCI与CABG记忆衰退的组间差异估计值为0.015记忆单位/年(95%置信区间,-0.008至0.038;P = 0.21)。与PCI后相比,非体外循环CABG后记忆衰退速率有统计学显著增加(差异估计:非体外循环CABG后衰退速率平均增加0.046记忆单位/年[95%置信区间,0.008至0.084]),但与PCI后相比,体外循环CABG后无显著差异(差异估计:体外循环CABG后衰退速率平均减缓0.003记忆单位/年[95%置信区间,-0.024至0.031])。
在接受CABG或PCI进行冠状动脉血运重建的老年人中,血运重建手术类型与记忆衰退速率变化的差异无显著关联。