Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital/Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, Division of Pediatric Neurological Surgery, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital/Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Aug;68(8):e29093. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29093. Epub 2021 May 18.
Complex cranial vault reconstruction (CCVR) for pediatric craniosynostosis is a high blood loss surgery, for which antifibrinolytic agents have been shown to reduce bleeding and transfusion requirements. The relative efficacy of ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) versus tranexamic acid (TXA) has not yet been evaluated in this population. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare perioperative blood loss and transfusion in CCVR patients receiving EACA versus TXA. In a CCVR cohort of 95 children, 47 received EACA and 48 received TXA. We found no differences in demographics, adverse outcomes, calculated blood loss (CBL), or transfusion requirements between the two antifibrinolytic groups.
儿童颅缝早闭的复杂颅盖重建(CCVR)是一种高失血量的手术,已证明抗纤维蛋白溶解剂可减少出血和输血需求。在该人群中,尚未评估 ε-氨基己酸(EACA)与氨甲环酸(TXA)的相对疗效。本回顾性研究旨在比较接受 EACA 与 TXA 的 CCVR 患者围手术期的失血和输血情况。在 95 例 CCVR 患儿中,47 例接受 EACA,48 例接受 TXA。我们发现两组抗纤维蛋白溶解剂之间在人口统计学、不良结局、计算失血量(CBL)或输血需求方面无差异。