• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ε-氨基己酸与氨甲环酸在减少全髋关节置换术后输血方面的比较

Comparison of ε-Aminocaproic Acid and Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Postoperative Transfusions in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Churchill Jessica L, Puca Kathleen E, Meyer Elizabeth S, Carleton Matthew C, Truchan Susan L, Anderson Michael J

机构信息

Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.

Medical Sciences Institute, BloodCenter of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2016 Dec;31(12):2795-2799.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.011
PMID:27286909
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of antifibrinolytic agents in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is well supported; however, most studies used tranexamic acid (TXA), whereas few used ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA), a similar antifibrinolytic. This study compares the efficacy and cost per surgery of intraoperative infusion of EACA and TXA in reducing postoperative blood transfusion rates in THA.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 1799 primary unilateral THA cases from April 2012 through December 2014 at 5 hospitals within our health care network.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 711 received EACA, 445 received TXA, and 643 (control group) received no antifibrinolytic. Both antifibrinolytic groups had significantly fewer patients receiving red blood cell (RBC) transfusions when compared with control group (EACA 6.8% [P < .0001], TXA 9.7% [P < .0001] vs control group 24.7%). Average number of RBC units per patient were similar for EACA and TXA (0.11 units/patient and 0.15 units/patient, respectively), and both were significantly lower than the control group (0.48 units/patient, P < .0001). No significant difference was noted in mean RBC units per patient and percentage of patients transfused between EACA and TXA groups (P = .144, P = .074). Logistic regression showed no difference between EACA and TXA when adjusting for age, gender, higher severity of illness levels, admission hemoglobin, performing surgeon, and hospital. Medication acquisition cost for EACA averaged $2.70 per surgery compared with TXA at $39.58 per surgery.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative antifibrinolytic use significantly decreases need for postoperative blood transfusions. At our institution, EACA is comparable to TXA in THA for reducing transfusion rates while at a lower cost per surgery.

摘要

背景

在全髋关节置换术(THA)中使用抗纤溶药物有充分的依据;然而,大多数研究使用的是氨甲环酸(TXA),而使用类似抗纤溶药物ε-氨基己酸(EACA)的研究较少。本研究比较了术中输注EACA和TXA在降低THA术后输血率方面的疗效及每次手术的成本。

方法

对我们医疗网络内5家医院2012年4月至2014年12月期间的1799例初次单侧THA病例进行回顾性病历审查。

结果

在我们的队列中,711例接受了EACA,445例接受了TXA,643例(对照组)未接受抗纤溶药物。与对照组相比,两个抗纤溶药物组接受红细胞(RBC)输血的患者明显减少(EACA组为6.8%[P <.0001],TXA组为9.7%[P <.0001],而对照组为24.7%)。EACA组和TXA组患者的平均RBC单位数相似(分别为0.11单位/患者和0.15单位/患者),且均显著低于对照组(0.48单位/患者,P <.0001)。EACA组和TXA组之间患者的平均RBC单位数及输血患者百分比无显著差异(P =.144,P =.074)。逻辑回归显示,在调整年龄、性别、更高的疾病严重程度水平、入院血红蛋白、主刀医生和医院后,EACA和TXA之间无差异。EACA的药物采购成本平均每次手术为2.70美元,而TXA为每次手术39.58美元。

结论

术中使用抗纤溶药物可显著降低术后输血需求。在我们机构,在THA中EACA在降低输血率方面与TXA相当,但每次手术成本更低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of ε-Aminocaproic Acid and Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Postoperative Transfusions in Total Hip Arthroplasty.ε-氨基己酸与氨甲环酸在减少全髋关节置换术后输血方面的比较
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Dec;31(12):2795-2799.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 13.
2
Comparing ε-Aminocaproic Acid and Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Postoperative Transfusions in Total Knee Arthroplasty.比较ε-氨基己酸和氨甲环酸在减少全膝关节置换术后输血中的作用
J Knee Surg. 2017 Jun;30(5):460-466. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593362. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
3
Tranexamic acid or epsilon-aminocaproic acid in total joint arthroplasty? A randomized controlled trial.氨甲环酸或 ε-氨基己酸用于全关节置换术?一项随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Sep;101-B(9):1093-1099. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1096.R1.
4
Epsilon Aminocaproic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss and Transfusion After Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty.氨甲环酸减少全髋关节和全膝关节置换术后失血和输血
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.020. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
5
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid versus tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis study.氨甲环酸与氨甲环酸在全膝关节置换术中的应用:荟萃分析研究。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2019 Jul 18;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s10195-019-0534-2.
6
Tranexamic versus aminocaproic acids in patients with total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study.氨甲环酸与氨甲苯酸在全髋关节置换术患者中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Nov 19;23(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05922-5.
7
Comparison of epsilon aminocaproic acid and tranexamic Acid in thoracic aortic surgery: clinical efficacy and safety.对比氨基己酸和氨甲环酸在胸主动脉手术中的应用:临床疗效和安全性。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Dec;27(6):1201-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
8
Blood Conservation Using Tranexamic Acid Is Not Superior to Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid After Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后使用氨甲环酸进行血液保护并不优于氨基己酸。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 4;99(19):1621-1628. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00738.
9
[Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in routine performance of total knee replacement surgery].氨甲环酸在全膝关节置换手术常规操作中的有效性
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2008 Feb;55(2):75-80. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(08)70513-9.
10
Tranexamic acid versus aminocaproic acid for blood management after total knee and total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.氨甲环酸与氨基己酸在全膝关节和全髋关节置换术后血液管理中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.042. Epub 2018 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of using aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid during the perioperative period for treating trochanteric fractures in elderly femurs.氨甲环酸和氨甲苯酸在老年股骨转子间骨折围手术期应用的疗效和安全性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jul 3;24(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06627-z.
2
Tranexamic versus aminocaproic acids in patients with total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study.氨甲环酸与氨甲苯酸在全髋关节置换术患者中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Nov 19;23(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05922-5.
3
Tranexamic Acid versus Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
氨甲环酸与ε-氨基己酸在全膝关节置换术中的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Nov 3;2021:1758066. doi: 10.1155/2021/1758066. eCollection 2021.
4
Perioperative Management in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.反式全肩关节置换术的围手术期管理
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Aug;14(4):282-290. doi: 10.1007/s12178-021-09709-4. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
5
Disorders of Fibrinogen and Fibrinolysis.纤维蛋白原和纤维蛋白溶解紊乱。
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2021 Dec;35(6):1197-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
6
Perioperative Blood Management Strategies for Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: Where Do We Currently Stand on This Matter?全髋关节置换术患者围手术期血液管理策略:我们目前在这个问题上处于什么立场?
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2020 Nov;8(6):646-655. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.45651.2249.
7
Bronchoscopic delivery of aminocaproic acid as a treatment for pulmonary bleeding: A case series.经支气管给予氨基己酸治疗肺出血:病例系列研究。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Feb;60:101871. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2019.101871. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
8
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid versus tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis study.氨甲环酸与氨甲环酸在全膝关节置换术中的应用:荟萃分析研究。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2019 Jul 18;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s10195-019-0534-2.
9
Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Versus Topical Aminocaproic Acid: Which Method Has the Least Blood Loss and Transfusion Rates?静脉注射氨甲环酸与局部应用氨基己酸:哪种方法的失血量和输血率最低?
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Nov 7;2(11):e072. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00072. eCollection 2018 Nov.
10
The efficacy of intravenous aminocaproic acid in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.静脉注射氨甲环酸在初次全髋关节和膝关节置换术中的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Apr 17;13(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0802-5.