Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 20;39(24):2720-2731. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03613. Epub 2021 May 18.
The Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) criteria, established in 2007, provide standardized definitions of adjuvant breast cancer clinical trial end points. Given the evolution of breast cancer clinical trials and improvements in outcomes, a panel of experts reviewed the STEEP criteria to determine whether modifications are needed.
We conducted systematic searches of ClinicalTrials.gov for adjuvant systemic and local-regional therapy trials for breast cancer to investigate if the primary end points reported met STEEP criteria. On the basis of common STEEP deviations, we performed a series of simulations to evaluate the effect of excluding non-breast cancer deaths and new nonbreast primary cancers from the invasive disease-free survival end point.
Among 11 phase III breast cancer trials with primary efficacy end points, three had primary end points that followed STEEP criteria, four used STEEP definitions but not the corresponding end point names, and four used end points that were not included in the original STEEP manuscript. Simulation modeling demonstrated that inclusion of second nonbreast primary cancer can increase the probability of incorrect inferences, can decrease power to detect clinically relevant efficacy effects, and may mask differences in recurrence rates, especially when recurrence rates are low.
We recommend an additional end point, invasive breast cancer-free survival, which includes all invasive disease-free survival events except second nonbreast primary cancers. This end point should be considered for trials in which the toxicities of agents are well-known and where the risk of second primary cancer is small. Additionally, we provide end point recommendations for local therapy trials, low-risk populations, noninferiority trials, and trials incorporating patient-reported outcomes.
标准化疗效终点定义(STEEP)标准于 2007 年建立,为辅助乳腺癌临床试验终点提供了标准化定义。鉴于乳腺癌临床试验的发展和结局的改善,一个专家小组审查了 STEEP 标准,以确定是否需要修改。
我们对 ClinicalTrials.gov 中辅助全身和局部区域治疗乳腺癌的临床试验进行了系统搜索,以调查报告的主要终点是否符合 STEEP 标准。基于常见的 STEEP 偏差,我们进行了一系列模拟,以评估将非乳腺癌死亡和新的非乳腺癌原发性癌症从无侵袭性疾病生存终点排除的影响。
在 11 项具有主要疗效终点的 III 期乳腺癌试验中,有 3 项主要终点符合 STEEP 标准,4 项使用了 STEEP 定义但未使用相应的终点名称,4 项使用的终点未包含在原始 STEEP 手稿中。模拟模型表明,包括第二非乳腺癌原发性癌症可以增加不正确推断的可能性,降低检测临床相关疗效效果的能力,并且可能掩盖复发率的差异,尤其是当复发率较低时。
我们建议增加一个额外的终点,即无侵袭性乳腺癌生存,该终点包括所有无侵袭性疾病生存事件,除了第二非乳腺癌原发性癌症。对于已知药物毒性且第二原发性癌症风险较小的试验,应考虑使用该终点。此外,我们还为局部治疗试验、低危人群、非劣效性试验以及纳入患者报告结局的试验提供了终点建议。