Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
PLoS One. 2021 May 18;16(5):e0251597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251597. eCollection 2021.
This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone as axillary surgery regardless of their clinical and pathological lymph node status. We reviewed the records of 1,795 patients from Asan Medical Center who were diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy during 2003-2014. We selected 760 patients who underwent SLNB alone as axillary surgery and divided these patients into four groups according to their clinical lymph node (cN) and pathological lymph node (pN) status: cN(-)pN(-) (n = 377), cN(-)pN(+) (n = 33), cN(+)pN(-) (n = 242), and cN(+)pN(+) (n = 108). We then compared axillary lymph node recurrence, locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) among the four groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis. We compared prognosis between the cN(-)pN(-) and cN(+)pN(-) groups to determine whether SLNB alone is an adequate treatment modality even in patients with cN positive pathology before neoadjuvant therapy but SLNB-negative pathology after NAC. The 5-year axillary recurrence rates in the cN(-)pN(-) and cN(+)pN(-) groups were 1.4% and 2.9%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.152). The axillary recurrence and LRR rates were significantly different among the four groups, with the pN-negative groups (cN[-]pN[-], cN[+]pN[-]) showing lower recurrence rates. DMFS and OS were also significantly different among the four groups, with the cN negative groups (cN[-]pN[-], cN[-]pN[+]) showing improved survival rates. Our study findings suggest that SLNB alone was associated with lower LRR rates even in patients with cN positive pathology before neoadjuvant therapy but cN negative pathology after SLNB. Moreover, recurrence and survival rates differ significantly according to clinical and pathological lymph node status.
本研究旨在评估接受新辅助化疗且仅行前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)作为腋窝手术的乳腺癌患者的预后,无论其临床和病理淋巴结状态如何。我们回顾了 2003 年至 2014 年期间在 Asan 医疗中心诊断为 I-III 期乳腺癌并接受新辅助化疗的 1795 名患者的记录。我们选择了 760 名仅行 SLNB 作为腋窝手术的患者,并根据其临床淋巴结(cN)和病理淋巴结(pN)状态将这些患者分为四组:cN(-)pN(-)(n=377),cN(-)pN(+)(n=33),cN(+)pN(-)(n=242)和 cN(+)pN(+)(n=108)。然后,我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析比较了四组之间的腋窝淋巴结复发、局部区域复发(LRR)、远处无转移生存(DMFS)和总生存(OS)。我们比较了 cN(-)pN(-)和 cN(+)pN(-)组之间的预后,以确定在新辅助治疗前病理学 cN 阳性但 NAC 后 SLNB 阴性的患者中,单独行 SLNB 是否是一种足够的治疗方式。cN(-)pN(-)和 cN(+)pN(-)组的 5 年腋窝复发率分别为 1.4%和 2.9%,两组之间无显著差异(p=0.152)。四组之间的腋窝复发和 LRR 率存在显著差异,pN 阴性组(cN[-]pN[-],cN[+]pN[-])复发率较低。DMFS 和 OS 也存在显著差异,cN 阴性组(cN[-]pN[-],cN[-]pN[+])生存率更高。我们的研究结果表明,即使在新辅助治疗前病理学 cN 阳性但 SLNB 后 cN 阴性的患者中,单独行 SLNB 也与较低的 LRR 率相关。此外,复发和生存情况根据临床和病理淋巴结状态存在显著差异。