Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗后残留淋巴结疾病的乳腺癌患者行前哨淋巴结活检术。

Sentinel node biopsy alone for breast cancer patients with residual nodal disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

机构信息

Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 27;11(1):9056. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88442-x.

Abstract

For residual N1 nodal disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with breast cancer, the optimal local therapy for axilla is an evolving area. We analyzed the long-term results of these patients according to axillary surgical methods using propensity score matching (PSM) to clarify whether omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is oncologically safe. This was a single institution retrospective study of patients with ypN1 from Asan Medical Center (AMC). We included 324 patients who had undergone axillary surgery with either sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) only or ALND. The patients received NAC at AMC between 2008 and 2013. General indications for ALND included prominent nodes detected clinically before NAC, evident macrometastasis on multiple nodes during SLNB. Patients who had either micrometastasis or macrometastasis in 1 or 2 node(s) were included. SLNB was performed for patients with good responders to NAC with limited nodal burden. Patients were matched for baseline characteristics. After matching, we included 98 patients in each SLNB only group and ALND group respectively. We compared axillary recurrence-free survival (ARFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-free survival (BCSS) according to the surgical method. The median follow-up period was 71 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups for ARFS, DMFS, OS, and BCSS. After the propensity score matching, no significant statistical differences were observed in 5-year ARFS, DMFS, OS, and BCSS between the SLNB only group and ALND group. SLNB might be a possible option for ALND in patients with breast cancer who have limited axillary node metastasis after NAC without compromising survival outcomes.

摘要

对于接受新辅助化疗 (NAC) 后乳腺癌患者的残留 N1 淋巴结疾病,腋窝的最佳局部治疗是一个不断发展的领域。我们通过倾向评分匹配 (PSM) 分析了这些患者根据腋窝手术方法的长期结果,以明确省略腋窝淋巴结清扫术 (ALND) 是否在肿瘤学上是安全的。这是一项来自首尔峨山医疗中心 (AMC) 的单中心回顾性研究,纳入了 324 例接受腋窝手术的 ypN1 患者,手术方式为前哨淋巴结活检 (SLNB) 或 ALND。患者于 2008 年至 2013 年在 AMC 接受 NAC。ALND 的一般适应证包括 NAC 前临床检查发现的明显淋巴结、SLNB 时多个淋巴结明显的宏观转移。包括 1 或 2 个淋巴结有微转移或宏观转移的患者。SLNB 适用于对 NAC 反应良好且淋巴结受累有限的患者。患者根据基线特征进行匹配。匹配后,分别纳入 SLNB 组和 ALND 组各 98 例患者。我们根据手术方法比较了腋窝无复发生存率 (ARFS)、远处无复发生存率 (DMFS)、总生存率 (OS) 和无乳腺癌生存率 (BCSS)。中位随访时间为 71 个月。单因素和多因素分析显示,两组间 ARFS、DMFS、OS 和 BCSS 无统计学差异。在倾向评分匹配后,SLNB 组和 ALND 组在 5 年 ARFS、DMFS、OS 和 BCSS 方面无显著统计学差异。在 NAC 后腋窝淋巴结转移有限且不影响生存结果的情况下,SLNB 可能是乳腺癌患者 ALND 的一种可行选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d32/8079673/77507b15bdd0/41598_2021_88442_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验