Ciesielski Adam, Boczar Krzysztof, Siekiera Markus, Gajek Jacek, Sławuta Agnieszka
Department of Cardiology, Multidisciplinary Public Hospital, Nowa Sól, Poland.
Department of Electrocardiology, The John Paul II Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Acta Cardiol. 2022 Apr;77(2):114-121. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2021.1901021. Epub 2021 May 19.
In patients with significantly impaired left ventricle function permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexists with symptoms of heart failure. Based on various studies, it is assumed that in patients with heart failure in functional class III and IV AF occurs in 40-50% of patients. AF adversely affects cardiac hemodynamics, and its harmfulness increases particularly in the failing heart. The lack of mechanical function of the left atrium, the usually fast ventricular rate and the irregular sequence of ventricular contraction constitute the spectrum of harmful effects of this arrhythmia. Therefore, the only way to address the underlying problem of AF, which is irregular ventricular rhythm, is to pace the ventricles and to slow or block the AV conduction. Classic, right ventricular pacing is contraindicated in this population as it promotes the abovementioned disorders by initiating additional dyssynchrony of left ventricular contraction with reduction of its contractility and aggravation of AF-related mitral regurgitation. The possibility of direct His bundle pacing (DHBP) significantly extended the clinical armamentarium of cardiac pacing. The restoration of the physiological electrical activation could significantly contribute to echocardiographic and clinical improvement. With time and the development of dedicated tools for direct His bundle pacing the success rate of implantations became more than 90% and the acceptable pacing thresholds under 2.0 V (1 ms) could be achieved in most patients. This contributed to the broader clinical application of DHBP in different patient' groups with various pacing indications. The authors of the paper discuss different electrocardiographic and clinical indications for DHBP.
在左心室功能严重受损的患者中,永久性心房颤动(AF)常与心力衰竭症状并存。基于多项研究,据推测在心功能Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级的心力衰竭患者中,40%-50%的患者会发生AF。AF对心脏血流动力学产生不利影响,尤其在衰竭心脏中其危害会增加。左心房缺乏机械功能、通常较快的心室率以及心室收缩的不规则顺序构成了这种心律失常的一系列有害影响。因此,解决AF潜在问题(即心室节律不规则)的唯一方法是对心室进行起搏,并减慢或阻断房室传导。经典的右心室起搏在这类患者中是禁忌的,因为它会引发左心室收缩的额外不同步,降低其收缩力并加重与AF相关的二尖瓣反流,从而加重上述病症。直接希氏束起搏(DHBP)的可能性显著扩展了心脏起搏的临床手段。生理电激活的恢复可显著有助于超声心动图和临床改善。随着时间推移以及用于直接希氏束起搏的专用工具的发展,植入成功率超过了90%,并且大多数患者能够实现2.0V(1ms)以下可接受的起搏阈值。这促使DHBP在具有各种起搏适应症的不同患者群体中得到更广泛的临床应用。本文作者讨论了DHBP的不同心电图和临床适应症。