Denney-Koelsch Erin, Cote-Arsenault Denise
Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
School of Nursing, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 May 18. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002857.
When parents are facing a life-limiting fetal condition (LLFC), decision making about prenatal and neonatal care is very stressful. To participate in successful shared decision making, interdisciplinary care teams need to understand factors that parents consider and the process by which they make decisions about care of their baby.
This study reports on findings about parental decision making from a larger longitudinal, naturalistic study of parents' experiences of continuing pregnancy with an LLFC. Mothers and fathers over 18 were interviewed in person, on phone or via video, twice during pregnancy and twice after birth and death. Transcripts were professionally transcribed and verified. Data were analysed with iterative coding and theme identification, using within-case and cross-case comparison.
Thirty parents (16 mothers, 13 fathers, 1 lesbian partner) from multiple US states and a range of racial/ethnic backgrounds were interviewed. Parents' experience with decision making was difficult, stressful and time-sensitive. They described a three-phase process: (1) identifying the decision to be made, (2) conducting a risk-benefit analysis to weigh objective medical information and subjective factors (values and spirituality, impact on self, partner, baby and the other children) and (3) making a decision. Parents considered diagnostic and prognostic certainty, likelihood of a good outcome and avoidance of suffering and regrets.
For shared-decision making, healthcare providers must discuss objective medical information as well as recognise parents' subjective values and priorities. This study expands on the literature on parental decision making around the numerous types of decisions after LLFC, informing obstetrics, neonatology and palliative care.
当父母面临胎儿预后不良的情况时,关于产前和新生儿护理的决策压力非常大。为了成功参与共同决策,跨学科护理团队需要了解父母考虑的因素以及他们为照顾婴儿做出决策的过程。
本研究报告了一项关于父母决策的研究结果,该研究是一项更大规模的纵向、自然主义研究,涉及父母在胎儿预后不良情况下继续妊娠的经历。18岁以上的母亲和父亲在孕期接受了两次面对面、电话或视频访谈,在婴儿出生及死亡后又接受了两次访谈。访谈记录由专业人员转录并核实。使用案例内和跨案例比较,通过迭代编码和主题识别对数据进行分析。
来自美国多个州、具有不同种族/族裔背景的30位父母(16位母亲、13位父亲、1位女同性恋伴侣)接受了访谈。父母的决策经历艰难、压力大且时间紧迫。他们描述了一个三阶段过程:(1)确定要做出的决策,(2)进行风险效益分析,权衡客观医学信息和主观因素(价值观和精神信仰、对自身、伴侣、婴儿及其他子女的影响),(3)做出决策。父母会考虑诊断和预后的确定性、良好结局的可能性以及避免痛苦和遗憾。
对于共同决策,医疗保健提供者必须讨论客观医学信息,同时认识到父母的主观价值观和优先事项。本研究扩展了关于父母在胎儿预后不良后众多决策方面的文献,为产科、新生儿科和姑息治疗提供了参考。