Lotto Robyn, Smith Lucy K, Armstrong Natalie
School of Nursing and Allied Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e014716. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014716.
To explore clinicians' perspectives on supporting parents' decision-making following diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly, and how this is shaped by current policy.
This paper reports data collated as part of a larger project examining parents' decision-making following antenatal diagnosis. The focus of this paper is the data arising from semistructured interviews conducted with 18 clinicians, with findings further supported by data generated from consultations between clinicians and parents. All interviews and consultations were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, with analysis based on the constant comparative approach.
Three key themes emerged which together shape the practice of clinicians working in this area: first, the law governing termination of pregnancy (TOP) and how clinicians believe this influences the context in which decisions about whether to terminate or continue an affected pregnancy are made; second, approaches to the management of cases seen as particularly challenging; and third, how clinicians understand their role when working with parents. These themes combine to create a strong desire on the part of clinicians for parents to engage in a particular 'rational' form of decision-making and to be able to demonstrate the enactment of this. This is seen as important in order to ensure the 'right' decision has been reached and, particularly when the decision is to terminate, will withstand possible scrutiny.
The policy context in which these decisions are made strongly shapes how clinicians practise and what they want to see from the parents with whom they work. The ways in which they seek to overcome the difficulties in interpreting the law may result in variations in the offer of late TOP, both between and within units. This may inadvertently affect the options available to women least able to engage in this idealised form of decision-making.
探讨临床医生对于支持父母在胎儿被诊断出严重先天性异常后的决策制定的观点,以及当前政策如何影响这一过程。
本文报告了作为一个更大项目的一部分所整理的数据,该项目考察了产前诊断后父母的决策制定情况。本文重点关注对18名临床医生进行半结构化访谈所产生的数据,临床医生与父母之间咨询产生的数据进一步支持了研究结果。所有访谈和咨询均进行了录音并逐字转录,分析基于持续比较法。
出现了三个关键主题,共同塑造了该领域临床医生的实践:第一,关于终止妊娠(TOP)的法律以及临床医生认为这如何影响做出是否终止或继续受影响妊娠决策的背景;第二,处理被视为特别具有挑战性的病例的方法;第三,临床医生在与父母合作时如何理解自己的角色。这些主题共同促使临床医生强烈希望父母采用一种特定的“理性”决策形式,并能够证明其实施情况。这被视为很重要,以便确保做出了“正确”的决定,特别是当决定是终止妊娠时,能够经受住可能的审查。
做出这些决策的政策背景极大地影响了临床医生的实践方式以及他们对与其合作的父母的期望。他们试图克服法律解释困难的方式可能导致不同单位之间以及单位内部在晚期终止妊娠提议上的差异。这可能会无意中影响那些最无法采用这种理想化决策形式的女性的选择。