Department of Sportorthopedic, Technical University of Munich, Munchen, Germany.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
J ISAKOS. 2021 May;6(3):129-137. doi: 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000493. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
Treatment strategies for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries continue to evolve. Evidence supporting best practice guidelines for the management of ACL injury is to a large extent based on studies with low-level evidence. An international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance towards consensus opinions regarding the best available evidence on operative versus non-operative treatment for ACL injury.The purpose of this study was to report the consensus statements on operative versus non-operative treatment of ACL injuries developed at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium 2019. Sixty-six international experts on the management of ACL injuries, representing 18 countries, convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Proposed consensus statements were drafted by the Scientific Organising Committee and Session Chairs for the three working groups. Panel participants reviewed preliminary statements prior to the meeting and provided initial agreement and comments on the statement via online survey. During the meeting, discussion and debate occurred for each statement, after which a final vote was then held. Eighty per cent agreement was defined a priori as consensus. A total of 11 of 13 statements on operative veresus non-operative treatment of ACL injury reached consensus during the symposium. Nine statements achieved unanimous support; two reached strong consensus; one did not achieve consensus; and one was removed due to redundancy in the information provided.In highly active patients engaged in jumping, cutting and pivoting sports, early anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is recommended due to the high risk of secondary meniscus and cartilage injuries with delayed surgery, although a period of progressive rehabilitation to resolve impairments and improve neuromuscular function is recommended. For patients who seek to return to straight plane activities, non-operative treatment with structured, progressive rehabilitation is an acceptable treatment option. However, with persistent functional instability or when episodes of giving way occur, anatomical ACLR is indicated. The consensus statements derived from international leaders in the field will assist clinicians in deciding between operative and non-operative treatment with patients after an ACL injury.Level of evidence: V.
前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的治疗策略不断发展。支持 ACL 损伤管理最佳实践指南的证据在很大程度上基于低水平证据的研究。一个国际专家共识小组被召集在一起,共同就 ACL 损伤的手术与非手术治疗的最佳现有证据达成共识意见。本研究的目的是报告 2019 年 ACL 共识会议 Panther 研讨会中关于 ACL 损伤手术与非手术治疗的共识声明。来自 18 个国家的 66 名 ACL 损伤管理方面的国际专家代表聚集在一起,采用德尔菲法进行了一次基于共识的过程。科学组织委员会和三个工作组的主席起草了拟议的共识声明。小组参与者在会议前审查了初步声明,并通过在线调查对声明的初步意见进行了初步同意和评论。在会议期间,对每一项声明进行了讨论和辩论,然后进行了最终投票。80%的一致意见被定义为共识。在研讨会期间,有 11 项关于 ACL 损伤手术与非手术治疗的声明达成了共识。其中 9 项声明得到了一致支持;2 项声明得到了强烈支持;1 项声明没有达成共识;1 项声明因提供的信息重复而被删除。在从事跳跃、切割和枢轴运动的高度活跃患者中,由于延迟手术会导致半月板和软骨的二次损伤风险较高,建议早期进行解剖学前交叉韧带重建(ACLR),尽管推荐进行渐进性康复以解决功能障碍并改善神经肌肉功能。对于寻求回归平面活动的患者,非手术治疗结合结构化、渐进性康复是一种可接受的治疗选择。然而,对于持续存在功能不稳定或出现易位现象的患者,建议进行解剖学 ACLR。这些来自该领域国际领导者的共识声明将有助于临床医生在 ACL 损伤后与患者决定手术或非手术治疗。证据水平:V。