Michel Jesse S, Rotch Michael A, Carson Jack E, Bowling Nathan A, Shifrin Nicole V
Department of Psychological Sciences, Auburn University, 226 Thach Hall, Auburn, AL 36849-5214 USA.
Department of Management, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC USA.
Occup Health Sci. 2021;5(3):247-275. doi: 10.1007/s41542-021-00087-4. Epub 2021 May 14.
The COVID-19 pandemic represents one of the greatest global crises in modern history. In addition to recession and high unemployment, agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warn that stressors associated with a pandemic can cause increased strains, including difficulty concentrating, anxiety, and decreased mental health (CDC, 2020). Two general frameworks that explain these stressor-strain relationships over time include and . Stress-reaction models suggest that stressors, such as heightened job demands due to the pandemic, accumulate over time and thus prolonged exposure to these stressors results in both immediate and long-term strain; conversely, adaptation models suggest that people adapt to stressors over time, such that strains produced by ongoing stressors tend to dissipate. After controlling for county-level COVID-19 cases, we found that (a) workers in general exhibited decreasing cognitive weariness and psychological symptoms over time, providing support for the adaptation model; (b) on-site workers experienced increasing physical fatigue over time, supporting the stress-reaction model among those workers; and (c) engaging in recovery behaviors was associated with improvements in cognitive weariness and psychological symptoms for all workers. We also found that our Time 1 outcomes were significantly different than pre-pandemic norms, such that our participants displayed lower initial levels of job-related burnout and higher initial levels of psychological symptoms than pre-pandemic norms. Furthermore, supplemental qualitative data support our quantitative findings for recovery behaviors. These findings have important implications for understanding workers' responses to the pandemic and they can help inform organizational practice.
新冠疫情是现代历史上最严重的全球危机之一。除了经济衰退和高失业率外,美国疾病控制与预防中心等机构警告称,与疫情相关的压力源会导致压力增加,包括注意力难以集中、焦虑和心理健康状况下降(美国疾病控制与预防中心,2020年)。随着时间推移,解释这些压力源与压力之间关系的两个总体框架包括压力反应模型和适应模型。压力反应模型表明,诸如因疫情导致工作要求提高等压力源会随着时间积累,因此长期暴露于这些压力源会导致即时和长期的压力;相反,适应模型表明人们会随着时间适应压力源,因此持续压力源产生的压力往往会消散。在控制了县级新冠病例数后,我们发现:(a)总体而言,随着时间推移,员工的认知疲劳和心理症状有所减轻,这为适应模型提供了支持;(b)现场工作人员随着时间推移身体疲劳加剧,这支持了这些员工中的压力反应模型;(c)所有员工采取恢复行为都与认知疲劳和心理症状的改善有关。我们还发现,我们在时间1的结果与疫情前的标准有显著差异,即我们的参与者与疫情前标准相比,工作倦怠的初始水平较低,心理症状的初始水平较高。此外,补充性的定性数据支持了我们关于恢复行为的定量研究结果。这些发现对于理解员工对疫情的反应具有重要意义,并且有助于为组织实践提供参考。