• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫情期间工作不安全感的起伏:习惯性应对方式的作用。

The rise and fall of job insecurity during a pandemic: The role of habitual coping.

作者信息

El Khawli Elissa, Keller Anita C, Agostini Maximilian, Gützkow Ben, Kreienkamp Jannis, Leander N Pontus, Scheibe Susanne

机构信息

University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Vocat Behav. 2022 Dec;139:103792. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103792. Epub 2022 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103792
PMID:36213623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9531324/
Abstract

Crises like the COVID-19 pandemic can trigger concerns about loss of employment and changes in work conditions, and thereby increase job insecurity. Yet, little is known about how perceived job insecurity subsequently unfolds over time and how individual differences in habitual coping moderate such a trajectory. Using longitudinal data from 899 US-based participants across 5 waves (March to June 2020), we investigated the trajectory of job insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic and how this trajectory depended on habitual coping strategies such as planning, reappraisal, and distraction. Results from latent growth curve analysis indicated that, on average, job insecurity initially increased and then decreased after signing of the coronavirus stimulus bill, suggesting a pattern of shock followed by adjustment. During the shock phase, habitual use of distraction was related to less increases in job insecurity. Later during the adjustment phase, decreases in job insecurity were more pronounced for individuals with higher habitual use of planning, but were not affected by reappraisal or distraction. Hence, different coping strategies appear beneficial in different phases of adjustment, and the beneficial effect of planning may take time to manifest. Altogether, our study highlights how in the context of extraordinary and uncontrollable events, coping strategies can impact the trajectory of a stressor.

摘要

像新冠疫情这样的危机可能引发对失业和工作条件变化的担忧,从而加剧工作不安全感。然而,对于感知到的工作不安全感随后如何随时间演变,以及习惯性应对方式的个体差异如何调节这种轨迹,我们却知之甚少。利用来自899名美国参与者的五轮纵向数据(2020年3月至6月),我们研究了新冠疫情期间工作不安全感的轨迹,以及该轨迹如何取决于习惯性应对策略,如计划、重新评估和分心。潜在增长曲线分析结果表明,平均而言,工作不安全感在签署冠状病毒刺激法案后最初上升,然后下降,呈现出先冲击后调整的模式。在冲击阶段,习惯性地使用分心策略与工作不安全感的较少增加有关。在后期的调整阶段,对于习惯性使用计划策略较多的个体,工作不安全感的下降更为明显,但不受重新评估或分心策略的影响。因此,不同的应对策略在调整的不同阶段似乎都有益处,而且计划策略的有益效果可能需要时间才能显现。总之,我们的研究凸显了在特殊且不可控事件的背景下,应对策略如何能够影响压力源的轨迹。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/122c/9531324/3349fabb1011/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/122c/9531324/18fbed83d4cd/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/122c/9531324/3349fabb1011/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/122c/9531324/18fbed83d4cd/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/122c/9531324/3349fabb1011/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
The rise and fall of job insecurity during a pandemic: The role of habitual coping.疫情期间工作不安全感的起伏:习惯性应对方式的作用。
J Vocat Behav. 2022 Dec;139:103792. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103792. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
2
Health and wellbeing of staff working at higher education institutions globally during the post-COVID-19 pandemic period: evidence from a cross-sectional study.全球后 COVID-19 大流行时期高校工作人员的健康和福利:来自横断面研究的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 11;24(1):1848. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19365-1.
3
Job Insecurity and Mental Health: The Moderating Role of Coping Strategies From a Gender Perspective.工作不安全感与心理健康:从性别视角看应对策略的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 18;10:286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00286. eCollection 2019.
4
Impact of Fear of COVID-19 Pandemic on Job Insecurity and Subjective Well-Being.新冠疫情大流行对工作安全感和主观幸福感的影响。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221102695. doi: 10.1177/00469580221102695.
5
Intolerance of Uncertainty and Fear of COVID-19 Moderating Role in Relationship Between Job Insecurity and Work-Related Distress in the Republic of Serbia.不确定性不耐受和对新冠病毒的恐惧在塞尔维亚共和国工作不安全感与工作相关困扰关系中的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 11;12:647972. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647972. eCollection 2021.
6
Association of Perceived Job Insecurity With Subsequent Memory Function and Decline Among Adults 55 Years or Older in England and the US, 2006 to 2016.2006 年至 2016 年期间,英国和美国 55 岁及以上成年人的感知工作不安全感与随后的记忆功能和下降之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e227060. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7060.
7
The Threat of COVID-19 and Job Insecurity Impact on Depression and Anxiety: An Empirical Study in the USA.新冠疫情的威胁与工作不安全感对抑郁和焦虑的影响:美国的一项实证研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:648572. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648572. eCollection 2021.
8
Job insecurity and mental health related outcomes among the humanitarian workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.新冠疫情期间人道主义工作者的工作不安全感与心理健康相关后果:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 14;10(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00974-7.
9
On the Reciprocal Relationship between Quantitative and Qualitative Job Insecurity and Outcomes. Testing a Cross-Lagged Longitudinal Mediation Model.论定量和定性工作不安全感与结果之间的相互关系。检验交叉滞后纵向中介模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 12;18(12):6392. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126392.
10
Job insecurity and emotional disturbance of Polish employees during pandemic COVID-19.波兰员工在大流行 COVID-19 期间的工作不安全感和情绪困扰。
Med Pr. 2021 Dec 22;72(6):645-652. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.01181. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological impacts of AI-induced job displacement among Indian IT professionals: a Delphi-validated thematic analysis.人工智能导致印度信息技术专业人员工作岗位被取代的心理影响:一项经德尔菲法验证的主题分析
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2556445. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2025.2556445. Epub 2025 Sep 2.
2
A nationwide study exploring the factors associated with psychological resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore.一项在新加坡开展的全国性研究,旨在探究与新冠疫情期间心理韧性相关的因素。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 24;13:1516829. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1516829. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Flattening the Latent Growth Curve? Explaining Within-Person Changes in Employee Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic.使潜在增长曲线变平缓?解释新冠疫情期间员工幸福感的个体内部变化
Occup Health Sci. 2021;5(3):247-275. doi: 10.1007/s41542-021-00087-4. Epub 2021 May 14.
2
The psychological implications of COVID-19 on employee job insecurity and its consequences: The mitigating role of organization adaptive practices.COVID-19 对员工工作不安全感及其后果的心理影响:组织适应实践的缓解作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Mar;106(3):317-329. doi: 10.1037/apl0000896.
3
Job Insecurity and Financial Concern During the COVID-19 Pandemic Are Associated With Worse Mental Health.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,工作不安全感和财务担忧与更差的心理健康相关。
J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Sep;62(9):686-691. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001962.
4
Individual differences and changes in subjective wellbeing during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情早期的主观幸福感的个体差异和变化。
Am Psychol. 2021 Jan;76(1):50-62. doi: 10.1037/amp0000702. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
5
In the eye of the beholder: How proactive coping alters perceptions of insecurity.旁观者眼中的看法:积极应对如何改变对不安全感的认知。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2020 Dec;25(6):385-400. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000198. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
The Covid-19 crisis as a career shock: Implications for careers and vocational behavior.新冠疫情危机作为一种职业冲击:对职业和职业行为的影响。
J Vocat Behav. 2020 Jun;119:103434. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103434. Epub 2020 May 8.
7
One Size Does Not Fit All: Tailoring Cognitive Reappraisal to Different Emotions.一刀切并不适合所有情况:对不同情绪进行认知重评的定制化。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Mar;46(3):469-484. doi: 10.1177/0146167219861432. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
8
Development of perceived job insecurity among young workers: a latent class growth analysis.年轻工人感知工作不安全感的发展:潜类增长分析。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019 Aug;92(6):901-918. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01429-0. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
9
Job Insecurity and Mental Health: The Moderating Role of Coping Strategies From a Gender Perspective.工作不安全感与心理健康:从性别视角看应对策略的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 18;10:286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00286. eCollection 2019.
10
Development and Validation of the Heidelberg Form for Emotion Regulation Strategies (HFERST): Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity.《海德堡情绪调节策略量表(HFERST)的编制与验证:量表结构、信度与效度》
Assessment. 2019 Jul;26(5):880-906. doi: 10.1177/1073191117720283. Epub 2017 Jul 21.