Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Besevler, 06500, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Radiology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
J Anesth. 2021 Aug;35(4):591-594. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-02947-3. Epub 2021 May 19.
We aimed to assess the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based real-time anatomy identification software specifically developed to ease image interpretation intended for ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block (UGPNB). Forty healthy participants (20 women, 20 men) were enrolled to perform interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks under ultrasound guidance using AI software by anesthesiology trainees. During block practice by a trainee, once the software indicates 100% scan success of each block associated anatomic landmarks, both raw and labeled ultrasound images were saved, assessed, and validated using a 5-point scale by expert validators. When trainees reached 100% scan success, accuracy scores of the validators were noted. Correlation analysis was used whether the relationship (r) according to demographics (gender, age, and body mass index: BMI) and block type exist. The BMI (kg/m) and age (year) of participants were 22.2 ± 3 and 32.2 ± 5.25, respectively. Assessment scores of validators for all blocks were similar in male and female individuals. Mean assessment scores of validators were not significantly different according to age and BMI except for TAP block, which was inversely correlated with age and BMI (p = 0.01). AI technology can successfully interpret anatomical structures in real-time sonography while assisting young anesthesiologists during UGPNB practice.
我们旨在评估一款专为简化超声引导外周神经阻滞(UGPNB)图像解读而设计的人工智能(AI)实时解剖识别软件的准确性。40 名健康参与者(20 名女性,20 名男性)被招募,由麻醉学学员使用 AI 软件在超声引导下进行斜角肌、锁骨上、锁骨下和腹横平面(TAP)阻滞。在学员进行阻滞操作时,一旦软件指示每个相关解剖标志的扫描成功率达到 100%,就会保存原始和标记的超声图像,并由专家验证者使用 5 分制进行评估和验证。当学员达到 100%的扫描成功率时,记录验证者的准确率得分。分析了根据人口统计学(性别、年龄和体重指数:BMI)和阻滞类型存在的关系(r)。参与者的 BMI(kg/m)和年龄(岁)分别为 22.2±3 和 32.2±5.25。在男性和女性个体中,验证者对所有阻滞的评估得分相似。除 TAP 阻滞外,验证者的平均评估得分与年龄和 BMI 无显著差异,而 TAP 阻滞与年龄和 BMI 呈负相关(p=0.01)。AI 技术可以在超声实时成像中成功解读解剖结构,同时在 UGPNB 实践中协助年轻麻醉医师。