Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2021 Jul 1;321(1):L213-L218. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00129.2021. Epub 2021 May 19.
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is fundamental to COVID-19 pathobiology, due to the interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) coreceptor for cellular entry. The prevailing hypothesis is that SARS-CoV-2-ACE2 interactions lead to an imbalance of the RAS, favoring proinflammatory angiotensin II (ANG II)-related signaling at the expense of the anti-inflammatory ANG-(1-7)-mediated alternative pathway. Indeed, multiple clinical trials targeting this pathway in COVID-19 are underway. Therefore, precise measurement of circulating RAS components is critical to understand the interplay of the RAS on COVID-19 outcomes. Multiple challenges exist in measuring the RAS in COVID-19, including improper patient controls, ex vivo degradation and low concentrations of angiotensins, and unvalidated laboratory assays. Here, we conducted a prospective pilot study to enroll 33 patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 and physiologically matched COVID-19-negative controls to quantify the circulating RAS. Our enrollment strategy led to physiological matching of COVID-19-negative and COVID-19-positive moderate hypoxic respiratory failure cohorts, in contrast to the severe COVID-19 cohort, which had increased severity of illness, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and increased mortality. Circulating ANG II and ANG-(1-7) levels were measured in the low picomolar (pM) range. We found no significant differences in circulating RAS peptides or peptidases between these three cohorts. The combined moderate and severe COVID-19-positive cohorts demonstrated a mild reduction in ACE activity compared with COVID-19-negative controls (2.2 ± 0.9 × 10 vs. 2.9 ± 0.8 × 10 RFU/mL, = 0.03). These methods may be useful in designing larger studies to physiologically match patients and quantify the RAS in COVID-19 RAS augmenting clinical trials.
肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)在 COVID-19 发病机制中至关重要,这是由于 SARS-CoV-2 病毒与细胞进入的血管紧张素转换酶 2(ACE2)核心受体之间的相互作用。目前的假设是,SARS-CoV-2-ACE2 相互作用导致 RAS 失衡,有利于促炎的血管紧张素 II(ANG II)相关信号,而牺牲抗炎的 ANG-(1-7)介导的替代途径。事实上,针对 COVID-19 中该途径的多项临床试验正在进行中。因此,精确测量循环 RAS 成分对于了解 RAS 对 COVID-19 结局的相互作用至关重要。在 COVID-19 中测量 RAS 存在多个挑战,包括患者控制不当、体外降解和血管紧张素浓度低以及未经验证的实验室检测。在这里,我们进行了一项前瞻性试点研究,招募了 33 名中度和重度 COVID-19 患者和生理匹配的 COVID-19 阴性对照者,以定量测量循环 RAS。我们的招募策略导致 COVID-19 阴性和 COVID-19 阳性中度低氧性呼吸衰竭队列的生理匹配,而与严重 COVID-19 队列相反,后者具有更高的疾病严重程度、延长的重症监护病房(ICU)停留时间和增加的死亡率。在皮摩尔(pM)范围内测量循环 ANG II 和 ANG-(1-7)水平。我们发现这三个队列之间循环 RAS 肽或肽酶没有显著差异。与 COVID-19 阴性对照相比,合并的中度和重度 COVID-19 阳性队列的 ACE 活性略有降低(2.2 ± 0.9 × 10 对 2.9 ± 0.8 × 10 RFU/mL, = 0.03)。这些方法可能有助于设计更大的研究,以生理匹配患者并量化 COVID-19 RAS 增强临床试验中的 RAS。