• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于COVID-19患者安全远程使用的5分钟认知评估:临床病例系列

A 5-Minute Cognitive Assessment for Safe Remote Use in Patients With COVID-19: Clinical Case Series.

作者信息

Beresford Thomas, Ronan Patrick J, Hipp Daniel

机构信息

Laboratory for Clinical and Translational Research in Psychiatry, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, United States.

Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jun 14;5(6):e26417. doi: 10.2196/26417.

DOI:10.2196/26417
PMID:34010137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8204938/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early clinical experience during the COVID-19 pandemic has begun to elucidate that the disease can cause brain function changes that may result in compromised cognition both acutely and during variable recovery periods. Reports on cognitive assessment of patients with COVID-19 are often limited to orientation alone. Further assessment may seem to create an inappropriate burden for patients with acute COVID-19, which is characterized by fatigue and confusion, and may also compromise examiner safety.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to assess cognition in patients with COVID-19 as comprehensively as possible in a brief format, while observing safety precautions, and to establish a clear face value of the external validity of the assessment.

METHODS

We adapted a brief cognitive assessment, previously applied to liver transplant candidates and medical/surgical inpatients, for remote use in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 treatment. Collecting quality assurance data from telephone-administered assessments, this report presents a series of 6 COVID-19 case vignettes to illustrate the use of this 5-minute assessment in the diagnosis and treatment of brain effects. Primary medical teams referred the cases for neuropsychiatric consultation.

RESULTS

The age of the patients varied over four decades, and none of them were able to engage meaningfully with their surroundings on admission. On follow-up examination 6 to 10 days later, 4 of the 6 patients had recovered working memory, and only 1 had recovered calculation ability. Of the 6 patients, 2 were capable of complex judgment responses, while none of the cases completed frontal executive function testing in the normal range.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive assessment in patients with COVID-19 using this remote examination reveals patterns of cognitive recovery that vary among cases and are far more complex than loss of orientation. In this series, testing of specific temporal, parietal, and frontal lobe functions suggests that calculation ability, judgment, and especially frontal executive functions may characterize the effects of COVID-19 on the brain. Used widely and serially, this examination method can potentially inform our understanding of the effects of COVID-19 on the brain and of healing from the virus.

摘要

背景

2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的早期临床经验已开始表明,该疾病可导致脑功能变化,这可能在急性期以及不同的恢复期导致认知受损。关于COVID-19患者认知评估的报告往往仅局限于定向评估。进一步的评估对于患有急性COVID-19的患者而言似乎会造成不适当的负担,这类患者的特点是疲劳和意识模糊,而且这也可能危及检查人员的安全。

目的

本研究的目的是在遵守安全预防措施的同时,以简短的形式尽可能全面地评估COVID-19患者的认知情况,并确定该评估外部效度的明确表面价值。

方法

我们采用了一种先前应用于肝移植候选者以及内科/外科住院患者的简短认知评估方法,供住院接受COVID-19治疗的患者远程使用。本报告通过收集电话评估的质量保证数据,呈现了6个COVID-19病例 vignette,以说明这种5分钟评估方法在脑部效应诊断和治疗中的应用。初级医疗团队将这些病例转介进行神经精神科会诊。

结果

患者年龄跨度超过40年,且入院时均无法有效地与周围环境互动。在6至10天后的随访检查中,6名患者中有4名恢复了工作记忆,只有1名恢复了计算能力。6名患者中,2名能够做出复杂的判断反应,而所有病例均未在正常范围内完成额叶执行功能测试。

结论

使用这种远程检查对COVID-19患者进行认知评估发现,认知恢复模式因病例而异,且远比定向障碍复杂。在本系列研究中,对特定颞叶、顶叶和额叶功能的测试表明,计算能力、判断力,尤其是额叶执行功能可能是COVID-19对大脑影响的特征。广泛且连续地使用这种检查方法可能会增进我们对COVID-19对大脑的影响以及从该病毒中恢复情况的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/074a/8204938/d51acf1da44d/formative_v5i6e26417_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/074a/8204938/5c423e89f208/formative_v5i6e26417_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/074a/8204938/f9c7237c69e2/formative_v5i6e26417_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/074a/8204938/d51acf1da44d/formative_v5i6e26417_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/074a/8204938/5c423e89f208/formative_v5i6e26417_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/074a/8204938/f9c7237c69e2/formative_v5i6e26417_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/074a/8204938/d51acf1da44d/formative_v5i6e26417_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
A 5-Minute Cognitive Assessment for Safe Remote Use in Patients With COVID-19: Clinical Case Series.一种用于COVID-19患者安全远程使用的5分钟认知评估:临床病例系列
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jun 14;5(6):e26417. doi: 10.2196/26417.
2
The COVID-19 pandemic altered the modality, but not the frequency, of formal cognitive assessment.新冠疫情改变了正式认知评估的方式,但未改变其频率。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Oct;44(21):6365-6373. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1963855. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
3
Korean Version of the Mini-Mental State Examination Using Smartphone: A Validation Study.使用智能手机的韩国版简易精神状态检查:一项验证研究。
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Oct;23(10):815-821. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0281. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
4
Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5-minute protocol is a brief, valid, reliable, and feasible cognitive screen for telephone administration.蒙特利尔认知评估5分钟流程是一种用于电话管理的简短、有效、可靠且可行的认知筛查工具。
Stroke. 2015 Apr;46(4):1059-64. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007253. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
5
Significance of the Feuerstein approach in neurocognitive rehabilitation.费尔斯坦方法在神经认知康复中的意义。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 18;39(1):19-35. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161335.
6
[Cognition, schizophrenia and the effect of antipsychotics].[认知、精神分裂症与抗精神病药物的作用]
Encephale. 2006 May-Jun;32(3 Pt 1):341-50. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76162-0.
7
Converting a Geriatrics Clinic to Virtual Visits during COVID-19: A Case Study.在 COVID-19 期间将老年病学诊所转为虚拟就诊:案例研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211000235. doi: 10.1177/21501327211000235.
8
Broadening Our Bandwidth: A Multiple Case Report of Expanded Use of Telehealth Technology to Perform Wound Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic.拓宽我们的带宽:COVID-19 大流行期间扩大远程医疗技术使用范围以进行伤口咨询的多案例报告。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;47(5):450-455. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000697.
9
Patients' Experiences of Remote Neurology Consultations during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间患者远程神经科会诊的体验
Eur Neurol. 2020;83(6):622-625. doi: 10.1159/000511900. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
10
Engaging Third-Year Medical Students on Their Internal Medicine Clerkship in Telehealth During COVID-19.在新冠疫情期间让三年级医学生参与远程医疗内科实习
Cureus. 2020 Jun 24;12(6):e8791. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8791.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation Between COVID-19 Recovery, Executive Function Decline, and Emotional State.新型冠状病毒肺炎康复、执行功能衰退与情绪状态之间的相关性
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025 Apr 23;18:1007-1019. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S487382. eCollection 2025.
2
The negative impact of COVID-19 on working memory revealed using a rapid online quiz.新冠疫情对工作记忆的负面影响:一项使用快速在线测试的研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 14;17(11):e0269353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269353. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Characterising neuropsychiatric disorders in patients with COVID-19.对新冠病毒病患者的神经精神障碍进行特征描述。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Nov;7(11):932-933. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30346-1.
2
The emerging spectrum of COVID-19 neurology: clinical, radiological and laboratory findings.新型冠状病毒肺炎神经系统表现的研究进展:临床、影像学和实验室表现。
Brain. 2020 Oct 1;143(10):3104-3120. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa240.
3
Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19 in 153 patients: a UK-wide surveillance study.153例新冠肺炎患者的神经及神经精神并发症:一项全英国范围的监测研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):875-882. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30287-X. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
4
Are we facing a crashing wave of neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19? Neuropsychiatric symptoms and potential immunologic mechanisms.我们是否正面临着一波 COVID-19 神经精神后遗症的浪潮?神经精神症状和潜在的免疫机制。
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jul;87:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.027. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
5
Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a multicenter European study.嗅觉和味觉障碍作为冠状病毒病(COVID-19)轻至中度形式的临床特征:一项多中心欧洲研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Aug;277(8):2251-2261. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05965-1. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
6
Towards Standardizing the Alcoholism Evaluation Of Potential Liver Transplant Recipients.迈向潜在肝移植受者酒精中毒评估的标准化
Alcohol Alcohol. 2018 Mar 1;53(2):135-144. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agx104.
7
Telephone-based screening tools for mild cognitive impairment and dementia in aging studies: a review of validated instruments.基于电话的轻度认知障碍和老年痴呆症筛查工具在衰老研究中的应用:已验证工具的综述。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Feb 25;6:16. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00016. eCollection 2014.
8
Validation of a 26-point telephone version of the Mini-Mental State Examination.简易精神状态检查表26项电话版的验证
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2004 Jun;17(2):81-7. doi: 10.1177/0891988704264534.
9
Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education.连线测验A和B:按年龄和教育程度分层的常模数据
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004 Mar;19(2):203-14. doi: 10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00039-8.
10
The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside.FAB:一种床边额叶评估量表。
Neurology. 2000 Dec 12;55(11):1621-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.11.1621.