Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 21;100(20):e25999. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025999.
Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has emerged as a primary diagnostic tool for the evaluation of developmental delay and structural malformations in children. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and value of CMA and karyotyping on diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in Fujian province of South China.In the study, 410 clinical samples were collected from pregnant women between March 2015 and December 2016, including 3 villus (0.73%, 3/410), 296 amniotic fluid (72.20%, 296/410), and 111 umbilical cord blood (27.07%, 111/410). All samples were screening for chromosomal abnormalities by both using CMA and karyotyping.The success rate of CMA and karyotyping was 100% (410/410) and 99.27% (407/410), respectively. Sixty-one (14.88%, 61/410) samples were presented with chromosomal abnormalities by using CMA, whereas 47 (11.55%, 47/407) samples were shown with chromosomal abnormalities by using karyotyping. Thirty-one (8.61%, 31/360) samples with normal karyotypes were found to exist chromosomal abnormalities by using CMA. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve of karyotyping on the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities was 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.87-0.93), the sensitivity and specificity was 87.56% and 91.22%, respectively. The area under the curve of CMA on the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.90-0.95), with 90.68% sensitivity and 94.40% specificity. Notably, the combination of CMA and karyotyping could improve the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities.CMA has a better diagnostic value for screening chromosomal abnormalities, especially for those pregnant women with normal karyotypes. This study has guiding value for prenatal diagnosis in Fujian province of South China.
染色体微阵列分析(CMA)已成为评估儿童发育迟缓及结构畸形的主要诊断工具。本研究旨在比较 CMA 和核型分析在诊断中国华南福建省染色体异常中的准确性和价值。
在这项研究中,我们收集了 2015 年 3 月至 2016 年 12 月期间的 410 例临床样本,包括 3 例绒毛膜(0.73%,3/410)、296 例羊水(72.20%,296/410)和 111 例脐血(27.07%,111/410)。所有样本均采用 CMA 和核型分析进行染色体异常筛查。CMA 和核型分析的成功率分别为 100%(410/410)和 99.27%(407/410)。61 例(14.88%,61/410)样本经 CMA 检测发现染色体异常,47 例(11.55%,47/407)样本经核型分析发现染色体异常。31 例(8.61%,31/360)核型正常的样本经 CMA 检测发现存在染色体异常。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,核型分析诊断染色体异常的曲线下面积为 0.90(95%置信区间:0.87-0.93),敏感度和特异度分别为 87.56%和 91.22%。CMA 诊断染色体异常的曲线下面积为 0.93(95%置信区间:0.90-0.95),敏感度和特异度分别为 90.68%和 94.40%。值得注意的是,CMA 和核型分析的联合应用可提高染色体异常的诊断率。
CMA 对筛查染色体异常具有更好的诊断价值,尤其是对核型正常的孕妇。本研究对中国华南地区的产前诊断具有指导意义。