Abu-Zaid Ahmed, Aljaili Aseel Khalid, Althaqib Amnah, Adem Fatima, Alhalal Doaa Ali, Almubarak Amena Faiq, Aldughaither Saud Musaab, Alghabban Sarah Ali, Alfaraj Ghaidaa, Masoud Ahmed Taher, Alsuhaibani Nujud Abdullah
College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
College of Graduate Health Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Ann Thorac Med. 2021 Apr-Jun;16(2):127-140. doi: 10.4103/atm.ATM_417_20. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of gefapixant, a novel P2X3 receptor antagonist, in patients with chronic cough.
We searched four databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We assessed the cough frequency, severity, total Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) score, and adverse events. We analyzed the data using Open Meta-Analyst and Review Manager Software.
We included four unique studies (comprising five stand-alone RCTs) with 439 patients. Compared to placebo, gefapixant had positive anti-tussive effects by improving awake cough frequency (mean difference [MD] = -5.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-6.12, -4.42], < 0.00001), night cough frequency (MD = -3.71, 95% CI [-6.57, -0.85], = 0. 01), 24 h cough frequency (MD = -4.18, 95% CI [-5.01, -3.36], < 0.00001), cough severity using the Visual Analog Scale (MD = -13.36, 95% CI [-17.80, -8.92], < 0.00001), cough severity diary (MD = -0.88, 95% CI [-1.25, -0.51], < 0.00001), and total LCQ score (MD = 2.00, 95% CI [1.15, 2.86], = 0. 00001). Meta-regression analyses showed a positive correlation between the gefapixant dose and the incidence of any adverse event (relative risk [RR] = 0.239, 95% CI [0.093, 1.839], = 0.001) and incidence of adverse event related to treatment (RR = 0.520, 95% CI [0.117, 0.922], = 0.011).
In patient with chronic cough, gefapixant exhibits favorable anti-tussive outcomes by improving the cough frequency, severity, and quality of life. While gefapixant is largely tolerable, its side effects (notably taste alteration) are dose dependent.
我们进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究新型P2X3受体拮抗剂格帕沙星对慢性咳嗽患者的疗效和安全性。
我们在四个数据库中检索随机对照试验(RCT)。我们评估了咳嗽频率、严重程度、莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ)总分以及不良事件。我们使用开放荟萃分析软件和Review Manager软件分析数据。
我们纳入了四项独立研究(包括五项独立的随机对照试验),共439例患者。与安慰剂相比,格帕沙星通过改善清醒时咳嗽频率(平均差[MD]=-5.27,95%置信区间[CI][-6.12,-4.42],P<0.00001)、夜间咳嗽频率(MD=-3.71,95%CI[-6.57,-0.85],P=0.01)、24小时咳嗽频率(MD=-4.18,95%CI[-5.01,-3.36],P<0.00001)、采用视觉模拟量表的咳嗽严重程度(MD=-13.36,95%CI[-17.80,-8.92],P<0.00001)、咳嗽严重程度日记(MD=-0.88,95%CI[-1.25,-0.51],P<0.00001)以及LCQ总分(MD=2.00,95%CI[1.15,2.86],P=0.00001),显示出积极的镇咳作用。荟萃回归分析显示,格帕沙星剂量与任何不良事件发生率(相对风险[RR]=0.239,95%CI[0.093,1.839],P=0.001)以及与治疗相关的不良事件发生率(RR=0.520,95%CI[0.117,0.922],P=0.011)之间呈正相关。
在慢性咳嗽患者中,格帕沙星通过改善咳嗽频率、严重程度和生活质量,展现出良好的镇咳效果。虽然格帕沙星在很大程度上是可耐受的,但其副作用(尤其是味觉改变)具有剂量依赖性。