Suppr超能文献

[儿童脑计算机断层扫描中枕大池的研究]

[A study of cisterna magna on brain computerized tomography in children].

作者信息

Yamatani M, Murakami M, Konda M, Konishi T, Okada T

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics Faculty of Medicine, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Japan.

出版信息

No To Shinkei. 1988 Apr;40(4):389-93.

PMID:3401409
Abstract

Although many publications on cranial computerized tomography have been reported in recent years, very little attention has been directed to the cisterna magna (CM) and its variations. The size of the cisterna magna is still debatable and the criterion of the mega cisterna magna is obscure. We studied age distribution, clinical manifestations, and other CT findings in the children with enlarged cisterna magna. A consecutive series of 367 computerized tomographic scans were reviewed. We classified four classes according to the degree of enlargement of the cisterna magna: CM is undetectable; CM (-), CM is detectable at the level of sella turcica and the fourth ventricle; CM(+), CM extends upward at the level of suprasellar cistern and colliculus inferior; CM (+ +), and CM extends extensively at the level of the third ventricle and colliculus superior; CM (+ + +). We judged 55 CT scans (15%) to belong to CM (+ + +) class and 100 scans (27%) to CM (+ +) class. The greater part of children with CM (+ + +) were younger in contrast with CM (+ +), which distributed uniformly in every ages. Also we differentiated the patients into three groups from clinical manifestations as follows: patients with developmental delayed; group D, patients with organic neurological diseases; group N, patients with other diseases; group O. The ratio of group D is significantly higher in CM (+ + +) than that of other groups. No children had posterior fossa symptoms of mass effect and required treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

尽管近年来已有许多关于头颅计算机断层扫描的出版物报道,但对枕大池(CM)及其变异的关注却很少。枕大池的大小仍存在争议,大枕大池的标准也不明确。我们研究了枕大池扩大患儿的年龄分布、临床表现及其他CT表现。回顾了连续367例计算机断层扫描。我们根据枕大池扩大程度将其分为四类:无法检测到CM;CM(-),在鞍区和第四脑室水平可检测到CM;CM(+),CM在鞍上池和下丘水平向上延伸;CM(++),CM在第三脑室和上丘水平广泛延伸;CM(+++)。我们判断55例CT扫描(15%)属于CM(+++)类,100例扫描(27%)属于CM(++)类。与CM(++)在各年龄段均匀分布相比,CM(+++)的大部分患儿年龄较小。我们还根据临床表现将患者分为三组:发育迟缓患者;D组,患有器质性神经疾病患者;N组,患有其他疾病患者;O组。CM(+++)组中D组的比例明显高于其他组。没有患儿出现后颅窝占位效应症状且需要治疗。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验