• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任度高的预测因素以及信心水平在寻求癌症相关信息中的作用。

Predictors of high trust and the role of confidence levels in seeking cancer-related information.

机构信息

Center for Health Promotion Disease Prevention, University of Texas School of Public, Health, TX, Houston, 77030, USA.

Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Inform Health Soc Care. 2022 Jan 2;47(1):53-61. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1925676. Epub 2021 May 20.

DOI:10.1080/17538157.2021.1925676
PMID:34014145
Abstract

One of the most commonly searched topics on the internet in the United States is cancer. Our study aims to provide a general overview of the predictors of trust for two health information sources, doctors and the internet, when seeking cancer-related information. The data were obtained from the 2018 HINTS 5 Cycle 2 survey, which was administered from January through May to a total of 3,504 respondents. We carried out next a series of ordinal logistic regression models to identify predictors of high trust in doctors and the internet separately for cancer-seeking information. Demographic predictor variables varied as predictors of high trust for cancer knowledge across both sources. Respondents who reported less confidence in their ability to seek cancer information had significantly higher odds of high trust in both doctors (OR = 8.43, CI: 5.58-12.73) and the internet (OR = 2.93, CI: 1.97-4.35) as compared to those who reported being "completely confident" in their ability to obtain cancer information. Understanding the key predictors of trust in doctors and the internet is crucial to the enhancement of health. The role of confidence as a predictor of trust in seeking cancer information has been shown to consistently influence the levels of trust attributed to each topic.

摘要

在美国,互联网上搜索最多的话题之一是癌症。我们的研究旨在提供关于医生和互联网这两个健康信息来源的信任预测因素的概述,以获取与癌症相关的信息。数据来自于 2018 年 HINTS 5 周期 2 调查,该调查于 1 月至 5 月期间对总共 3504 名受访者进行了调查。我们分别对一系列有序逻辑回归模型进行了分析,以确定对医生和互联网的高信任度的预测因素,以便分别寻找癌症信息。在两个来源中,对癌症知识的高信任度的预测因素因人口统计学预测变量而异。与那些对自己获取癌症信息的能力“完全有信心”的人相比,报告对自己寻找癌症信息的能力缺乏信心的人对医生(OR=8.43,CI:5.58-12.73)和互联网(OR=2.93,CI:1.97-4.35)的高信任度的可能性显著更高。了解对医生和互联网的信任的关键预测因素对于增进健康至关重要。信心作为对寻求癌症信息的信任的预测因素的作用已被证明始终会影响对每个主题的信任度。

相似文献

1
Predictors of high trust and the role of confidence levels in seeking cancer-related information.信任度高的预测因素以及信心水平在寻求癌症相关信息中的作用。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2022 Jan 2;47(1):53-61. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1925676. Epub 2021 May 20.
2
Perceived Needs Versus Predisposing/Enabling Characteristics in Relation to Internet Cancer Information Seeking Among the US and Chinese Public: Comparative Survey Research.感知需求与美国和中国公众互联网癌症信息搜索相关的倾向/促成因素:比较调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e24733. doi: 10.2196/24733.
3
Differences Between Races in Health Information Seeking and Trust Over Time: Evidence From a Cross-Sectional, Pooled Analyses of HINTS Data.种族间健康信息寻求和信任的差异随时间变化:来自 HINTS 数据的横断面、汇总分析的证据。
Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jan;35(1):84-92. doi: 10.1177/0890117120934609. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
4
[How do people in Germany seek health information? Insights from the first wave of HINTS Germany].[德国人如何获取健康信息?来自德国健康信息全国趋势调查(HINTS)首轮调查的见解]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Sep;63(9):1151-1160. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03192-x.
5
Trust in national health information sources in the United States: comparing predictors and levels of trust across three health domains.美国对国家卫生信息来源的信任:比较三个健康领域的信任预测因素和水平。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Oct 8;10(4):978-988. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz066.
6
Trends in patient information preferences and acquisition.患者信息偏好与获取的趋势
Radiol Technol. 2012 Mar-Apr;83(4):316-24.
7
Impact of Personal Trust Tendency on Patient Compliance Based on Internet Health Information Seeking.基于互联网健康信息搜索的个人信任倾向对患者依从性的影响。
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Mar;26(3):294-303. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0296. Epub 2019 May 1.
8
Health information-seeking behavior of seniors who use the Internet: a survey.使用互联网的老年人的健康信息寻求行为:一项调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 8;17(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3749.
9
Internet health information use by surrogate decision makers of patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a multicentre survey.重症监护病房患者代理人使用互联网健康信息的情况:一项多中心调查。
Crit Care Resusc. 2019 Dec;21(4):305-10.
10
Trusting Social Media as a Source of Health Information: Online Surveys Comparing the United States, Korea, and Hong Kong.将社交媒体作为健康信息来源的信任度:比较美国、韩国和中国香港地区的在线调查
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 14;18(3):e25. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4193.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of health information-seeking among patients with cancer in China: a qualitative study.中国癌症患者健康信息寻求经历:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 26;13:1584952. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1584952. eCollection 2025.
2
Cancer research in Lebanon: Scope of the most recent publications of an academic institution (Review).黎巴嫩的癌症研究:一个学术机构近期出版物的范围(综述)
Oncol Lett. 2024 Jun 3;28(2):350. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14484. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Health information-seeking experience in people with head and neck neoplasms undergoing treatment: a qualitative study.
治疗中的头颈部肿瘤患者的健康信息寻求体验:一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jan 23;32(2):128. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08329-1.
4
Trusting information on cancer varies by source of information and political viewpoint.人们对癌症信息的信任程度因信息来源和政治观点而异。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Jan;35(1):177-184. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01786-9. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
5
Identifying health research in the era of COVID-19: A scoping review.识别新冠疫情时代的健康研究:一项范围综述
SAGE Open Med. 2023 Jun 8;11:20503121231180030. doi: 10.1177/20503121231180030. eCollection 2023.
6
An efficient computer vision-based approach for acute lymphoblastic leukemia prediction.一种基于计算机视觉的急性淋巴细胞白血病高效预测方法。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2022 Nov 24;16:1083649. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2022.1083649. eCollection 2022.