Heytens Heike, Walther Felix, Keßler Laura, Bremer Daniel, Frenz Elisa, Härter Martin, Geraedts Max, Bierbaum Thomas, Apfelbacher Christian, Schmitt Jochen
Institut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg.
Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität, Dresden.
Gesundheitswesen. 2021 May;83(5):e20-e37. doi: 10.1055/a-1448-2412. Epub 2021 May 20.
This prospectively registered review characterizes 50 intervention studies from the 1 wave of the Innovation Fund based on study protocols or original articles, among other sources. The mainly (randomized) controlled intervention studies included predominantly adults/seniors in ambulatory care without a regional focus and analyzed treatment processes, clinical and patient outcomes as outcomes. The substantial lack of study protocols and methodological details (e. g., sample size planning) reveals (avoidable) methodological problems regarding the scientific quality of the funded studies.
这项前瞻性注册综述基于研究方案、原始文章及其他来源,对创新基金首轮的50项干预性研究进行了特征描述。主要的(随机)对照干预性研究主要纳入了非住院护理中的成年人/老年人,没有区域重点,且将治疗过程、临床和患者结局作为分析结果。研究方案和方法学细节(如样本量规划)的严重缺乏揭示了资助研究在科学质量方面(可避免的)方法学问题。