Sinha Debashree, Mishra Prem Shankar, Srivastava Shobhit, Kumar Pradeep
Department of Development Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400088, India.
Population Research Centre, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560072, India.
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 20;21(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02234-6.
Violence against older adults is a well-recognised socio-psychological and public health problem. It is uncared-for, undiagnosed, and an untreated problem that is widespread across both developed and developing countries. The present paper aims to understand the extent of the socio-economic status related inequality in violence against older adults in India.
The study uses data from Building a Knowledge Base on Population Aging in India (BKPAI). Violence against older adults is the outcome variable for the study and is defined as older adults who faced any abuse or violence or neglect or disrespect by any person. Bivariate analysis and regression-based decomposition technique is used to understand the relative contribution of various socio-economic factors to violence against older adults (N = 9541).
The prevalence of violence faced by older adults was 11.2%. Older adults aged 80+ years [OR: 1.49; CI: 1.14-1.93] and working [OR: 1.26; CI: 1.02-1.56] had higher likelihood to face violence than their counterparts. On the other hand, older adults who were currently in union [OR: 0.79; CI: 0.65-0.95], lived with children [OR: 0.53; CI: 0.40-0.72] and who belonged to richer wealth quintile [OR: 0.35; CI:0.24-0.51] had lower likelihood to suffer from violence than their counterparts. The decomposition results revealed that poor older adults were more prone to violence (Concentration index: - 0.20). Household's wealth status was responsible for explaining 93.7% of the socio-economic status related inequality whereas living arrangement of older adults explained 13.7% of the socio-economic related inequality. Education and working status of older adults made a substantial contribution to the inequalities in reported violence, explaining 3.7% and 3.3% of the total inequality, respectively.
Though interpretation of the results requires a cautious understanding of the data used, the present study highlights some of the relevant issues faced by the country's older adults. With no or meagre income of their own, older adults belonging to the poorest wealth quintile have little or no bargaining power to secure a violent free environment for themselves. Therefore, special attention in terms of social and economic support should be given to the economically vulnerable older population.
针对老年人的暴力行为是一个广为人知的社会心理和公共卫生问题。它未得到关注、未被诊断且未得到治疗,在发达国家和发展中国家都普遍存在。本文旨在了解印度在针对老年人暴力行为方面与社会经济地位相关的不平等程度。
该研究使用了来自印度人口老龄化知识库建设(BKPAI)的数据。针对老年人的暴力行为是该研究的结果变量,定义为遭受任何人的任何虐待、暴力、忽视或不尊重的老年人。采用双变量分析和基于回归的分解技术来了解各种社会经济因素对针对老年人暴力行为的相对贡献(N = 9541)。
老年人面临暴力行为的发生率为11.2%。80岁及以上的老年人[比值比:1.49;置信区间:1.14 - 1.93]和在职老年人[比值比:1.26;置信区间:1.02 - 1.56]比同龄人面临暴力的可能性更高。另一方面,目前处于婚姻关系中的老年人[比值比:0.79;置信区间:0.65 - 0.95]、与子女同住的老年人[比值比:0.53;置信区间:0.40 - 0.72]以及属于较富裕财富五分位数的老年人[比值比:0.35;置信区间:0.24 - 0.51]遭受暴力的可能性低于同龄人。分解结果显示,贫困老年人更容易遭受暴力(集中指数:-0.20)。家庭财富状况解释了与社会经济地位相关不平等的93.7%,而老年人的居住安排解释了与社会经济相关不平等的13.7%。老年人的教育和工作状况对报告的暴力行为不平等有很大贡献,分别解释了总不平等的3.7%和3.3%。
尽管对结果的解释需要谨慎理解所使用的数据,但本研究突出了该国老年人面临的一些相关问题。属于最贫困财富五分位数的老年人自身没有收入或收入微薄,几乎没有或根本没有议价能力为自己确保一个无暴力的环境。因此,应在社会和经济支持方面给予经济上脆弱的老年人群体特别关注。