Department of Mathematical Demography and Statistics, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400088, India.
Department of Population Policies and Programmes, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400088, India.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):1852. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09864-2.
With increasing urbanization in India, child growth among urban poor has emerged as a paramount public health concern amidst the continuously growing slum population and deteriorating quality of life. This study analyses child undernutrition among urban poor and non-poor and decomposes the contribution of various factors influencing socio-economic inequality. This paper uses data from two recent rounds of National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3&4) conducted during 2005-06 and 2015-16.
The concentration index (CI) and the concentration curve (CC) measure socio-economic inequality in child growth in terms of stunting, wasting, and underweight. Wagstaff decomposition further analyses key contributors in CI by segregating significant covariates into five groups-mother's factor, health-seeking factors, environmental factors, child factors, and socio-economic factors.
The prevalence of child undernutrition was more pronounced among children from poor socio-economic strata. The concentration index decreased for stunting (- 0.186 to - 0.156), underweight (- 0.213 to - 0.162) and wasting (- 0.116 to - 0.045) from 2005 to 06 to 2015-16 respectively. The steepness in growth was more among urban poor than among urban non-poor in every age interval. Maternal education contributed about 19%, 29%, and 33% to the inequality in stunting, underweight and wasting, respectively during 2005-06. During 2005-06 as well as 2015-16, maternal factors (specifically mother's education) were the highest contributory factors in explaining rich-poor inequality in stunting as well as underweight. More than 85% of the economic inequality in stunting, underweight, and wasting among urban children were explained by maternal factors, environmental factors, and health-seeking factors.
All the nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions in urban areas should be prioritized, focusing on urban poor, who are often clustered in low-income slums. Rich-poor inequality in child growth calls out for integration and convergence of nutrition interventions with policy interventions aimed at poverty reduction. There is also a need to expand the scope of the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) program to provide mass education regarding nutrition and health by making provisions of home visits of workers primarily focusing on pregnant and lactating mothers.
随着印度城市化进程的推进,城市贫困地区儿童的生长发育问题已成为一个突出的公共卫生问题,尤其是在贫民窟人口不断增加和生活质量不断恶化的情况下。本研究分析了城市贫困和非贫困儿童的营养不足情况,并对影响社会经济不平等的各种因素的贡献进行了分解。本文使用了最近两轮全国家庭健康调查(NFHS-3 和 NFHS-4)的数据,调查时间分别为 2005-06 年和 2015-16 年。
集中指数(CI)和集中曲线(CC)衡量了儿童生长发育迟缓、消瘦和体重不足方面的社会经济不平等。 Wagstaff 分解进一步将显著协变量分为五类——母亲因素、寻求医疗保健因素、环境因素、儿童因素和社会经济因素,以分析 CI 的主要贡献因素。
来自社会经济贫困阶层的儿童营养不足的发生率更高。2005-06 年至 2015-16 年,生长迟缓(从-0.186 降至-0.156)、体重不足(从-0.213 降至-0.162)和消瘦(从-0.116 降至-0.045)的集中指数分别下降。在每个年龄区间,城市贫困儿童的生长速度都比城市非贫困儿童更为陡峭。2005-06 年,母亲教育对生长迟缓、体重不足和消瘦的不平等贡献约为 19%、29%和 33%。在 2005-06 年和 2015-16 年,母亲因素(特别是母亲的教育)是造成城乡儿童营养不足和消瘦贫富差距的最高贡献因素。城市儿童生长迟缓、体重不足和消瘦的经济不平等有 85%以上可以用母亲因素、环境因素和寻求医疗保健因素来解释。
所有针对特定营养问题和营养敏感问题的干预措施都应在城市地区得到优先考虑,重点关注往往集中在低收入贫民窟的城市贫困儿童。儿童生长发育的贫富差距要求将营养干预与旨在减少贫困的政策干预相融合和趋同。此外,还需要扩大综合儿童发展服务(ICDS)计划的范围,通过提供家访服务,为工人提供有关营养和健康的大众教育,主要关注孕妇和哺乳期妇女。