Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, CIS-Iscte.
J Sex Res. 2022 May;59(4):484-492. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.1926413. Epub 2021 May 21.
We examined if motives for security (i.e., prevention focus) or pleasure (i.e., promotion focus) were uniquely associated with intentions to get tested for STIs and behavioral control over condom use, over and above variables already identified in theoretical models. We conducted an online survey with Portuguese adults ( = 836; = 22.27, = 5.14). Overall, 99.4% of the participants knew at least one of eight STIs, but only 25.2% got tested in the last six months. Participants more focused on prevention had condomless sex less frequently, whereas participants more focused on promotion knew more STIs and got tested for more STIs. Furthermore, participants had stronger intentions to get tested for STIs if they got tested for more STIs in the past, were more concerned about STIs, perceived greater susceptibility to STI acquisition, and were more focused on promotion (but not prevention). Participants had greater behavioral control over condom use if they had condomless sex less often and were more focused on prevention (but not promotion). These findings suggest that promotion-focused people are more likely to consider the consequences of having condomless sex. In contrast, prevention-focused people are more likely to take control of their sexual health.
我们考察了安全(即预防焦点)或愉悦(即促进焦点)动机是否与接受性传播感染检测的意愿和性行为中使用安全套的行为控制有关,这些动机超出了理论模型中已经确定的变量。我们对葡萄牙成年人进行了一项在线调查(n=836;年龄的平均值=22.27,标准差=5.14)。总体而言,99.4%的参与者至少了解八种性传播感染中的一种,但只有 25.2%的人在过去六个月内接受过检测。预防焦点更集中的参与者较少发生无保护性行为,而促进焦点更集中的参与者则了解更多的性传播感染,并接受更多的性传播感染检测。此外,如果参与者过去接受过更多的性传播感染检测、更关注性传播感染、认为自己更容易感染性传播感染,并且更关注促进(而不是预防),他们就会有更强的接受性传播感染检测的意愿。如果参与者较少发生无保护性行为,并且更关注预防(而不是促进),他们对使用安全套的行为控制就越强。这些发现表明,促进焦点的人更有可能考虑无保护性行为的后果。相比之下,预防焦点的人更有可能控制自己的性健康。