Suppr超能文献

Prevent2Protect 项目:性行为健康知识和实践中的监管重点差异。

Prevent2Protect Project: Regulatory Focus Differences in Sexual Health Knowledge and Practices.

机构信息

Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, CIS-Iscte, Av. das Forças Armadas, 1649-026, Lisbon, Portugal.

Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2023 May;52(4):1701-1713. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02536-3. Epub 2023 Jan 26.

Abstract

The way people perceive risks and make decisions about their health is regulated by two motivational systems-prevention of harm or promotion of pleasure. People more focused on prevention strive to avoid negative outcomes and enact more health-protective behaviors. In contrast, people more focused on promotion strive to attain positive outcomes and take more risks with their health. Building upon recent evidence extending this framework to sexual behaviors and health, we conducted a pre-registered online survey ( OSF ) with Portuguese and Spanish adults (N = 742; M = 31.42, SD = 9.16) to examine whether self-reported STI knowledge and sexual health practices differ based on predominant regulatory focus. This study was part of the Prevent2Protect project ( OSF ). Results showed that prevention-focused participants had heard about more STIs and retrieved more of their knowledge from scientific sources but had been tested for fewer STIs in the past. In contrast, promotion-focused participants indicated they had specific knowledge about more STIs, retrieved more of their knowledge from medical and peer sources, and had been tested for more STIs in the past. They also reported more frequent STI testing, using free testing facilities or asking their family practice doctor to get tested, more routine sexual health check-ups, and more use of other contraceptive methods, such as birth control pills. These results remained unchanged after controlling for demographic differences. Overall, our findings showed that different motives in sexuality shape sexual health knowledge and sexual health practices.

摘要

人们感知风险和做出健康决策的方式受到两个动机系统的调节——预防伤害或促进愉悦。更关注预防的人努力避免负面后果,并采取更多的健康保护行为。相比之下,更关注促进的人则努力实现积极的结果,并在健康方面承担更多的风险。基于最近将这一框架扩展到性行为和健康的证据,我们对葡萄牙语和西班牙语成年人(N=742;M=31.42,SD=9.16)进行了一项预先注册的在线调查(OSF),以检验自我报告的性传播感染知识和性健康实践是否基于主要的监管重点而有所不同。这项研究是预防 2 保护项目(OSF)的一部分。结果表明,关注预防的参与者听说过更多的性传播感染疾病,并从科学来源获取更多的相关知识,但过去接受的性传播感染疾病检测较少。相比之下,关注促进的参与者表示,他们对更多的性传播感染疾病有具体的了解,从医学和同行来源获取更多的知识,并在过去接受过更多的性传播感染疾病检测。他们还报告说,更频繁地进行性传播感染疾病检测,使用免费检测设施或要求他们的家庭医生进行检测,更经常进行常规的性健康检查,并更经常使用其他避孕方法,如避孕药。在控制了人口统计学差异后,这些结果仍然不变。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,性方面的不同动机塑造了性健康知识和性健康实践。

相似文献

1
Prevent2Protect Project: Regulatory Focus Differences in Sexual Health Knowledge and Practices.
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 May;52(4):1701-1713. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02536-3. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
2
3
Predictors of Condomless Sex and Sexual Health Behaviors in a Sample of Portuguese Single Adults.
J Sex Med. 2020 Jan;17(1):26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
5
Is Regulatory Focus Related to Condom Use, STI/HIV Testing, and Sexual Satisfaction?
J Sex Res. 2022 May;59(4):504-514. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.1961671. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
6
[How good is the knowledge about sexually transmitted infections in Germany? : Results of the first nationwide representative German health and sexuality survey (GeSiD)].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Nov;64(11):1355-1363. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03319-8. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
9
Motivations for Sexual Behavior and Intentions to Use Condoms: Development of the Regulatory Focus in Sexuality Scale.
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Feb;48(2):557-575. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1316-2. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Focusing on Safety or Pleasure Determine Condom Use Intentions Differently Depending on Condom Availability and STI Risk.
Int J Sex Health. 2023 May 15;35(3):341-351. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2023.2212651. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples.
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 24;14:1215209. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1215209. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
A Trend Analysis of Condom use in Spanish Young People over the Two Past Decades, 1999-2020.
AIDS Behav. 2022 Jul;26(7):2299-2313. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03573-6. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
2
University-based behavioral interventions to promote safer sex practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Am Coll Health. 2023 Aug-Sep;71(6):1822-1833. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1947835. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
3
Is Regulatory Focus Related to Condom Use, STI/HIV Testing, and Sexual Satisfaction?
J Sex Res. 2022 May;59(4):504-514. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.1961671. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
4
5
Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2555. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052555.
6
Correlates of STI Testing Among US Young Adults: Opportunities for Prevention.
Prev Sci. 2021 Feb;22(2):216-226. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01179-3. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
Condom use in penile-vaginal intercourse among Canadian adults: Results from the sex in Canada survey.
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 20;15(2):e0228981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228981. eCollection 2020.
8
Predictors of Condomless Sex and Sexual Health Behaviors in a Sample of Portuguese Single Adults.
J Sex Med. 2020 Jan;17(1):26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
10
Sexuality Education in the Digital Era: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Predictors of Online Sexual Information Seeking Among Youth.
J Sex Res. 2020 Feb;57(2):189-199. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1612830. Epub 2019 May 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验