Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Adv Ther. 2021 Jun;38(6):3399-3408. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01785-9. Epub 2021 May 21.
The IMvigor130 trial found that atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (atezolizumab group) as first-line therapy prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC), compared with placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy (placebo group). The current study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for mUC from the US payer perspective.
A Markov model was adopted to compare the cost and effectiveness of atezolizumab and placebo group in the first-line setting of patients with mUC. Life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Subgroup, one-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the model robustness.
Atezolizumab group provided an additional 0.39 QALYs (0.52 LYs) and an incremental cost of $170,759 per QALY compared with the placebo group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $434,317 per QALY. Subgroup analysis indicated that PD-L1 expression of at least 5% on immune cells had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $325,236 per QALY. The results of one-way sensitivity analyses suggested that our model was sensitive to the cycle cost of atezolizumab and the hazard ratio of PFS. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that there was 0% probability of the atezolizumab group being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 per QALY. The extrapolations need to be validated by real-world data.
From the US payer perspective, atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy is not cost-effective in the first-line therapy for patients with mUC on the basis of a WTP threshold of $150,000 per QALY. On the basis of the value standpoint, price reduction of atezolizumab is expected to improve the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab in patients with mUC.
IMvigor130 试验发现,与安慰剂加铂类化疗(安慰剂组)相比,阿替利珠单抗联合铂类化疗(阿替利珠单抗组)作为转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)的一线治疗可延长无进展生存期(PFS)。本研究旨在从美国支付者角度评估阿替利珠单抗联合铂类化疗作为 mUC 一线治疗的成本效益。
采用 Markov 模型比较 mUC 患者一线治疗中阿替利珠单抗组和安慰剂组的成本和疗效。计算生命年(LYs)、质量调整生命年(QALYs)、终生成本和增量成本效益比(ICERs)。进行了亚组、单向和概率敏感性分析以探索模型稳健性。
与安慰剂组相比,阿替利珠单抗组提供了额外的 0.39 QALYs(0.52 LYs)和 170759 美元/QALY 的增量成本。增量成本效益比为 434317 美元/QALY。亚组分析表明,免疫细胞上 PD-L1 表达至少为 5%的患者的增量成本效益比为 325236 美元/QALY。单向敏感性分析的结果表明,我们的模型对阿替利珠单抗的周期成本和 PFS 风险比敏感。概率敏感性分析表明,在 150000 美元/QALY 的意愿支付(WTP)阈值下,阿替利珠单抗组有 0%的可能性具有成本效益。需要通过真实世界的数据来验证外推。
从美国支付者的角度来看,基于 150000 美元/QALY 的意愿支付阈值,阿替利珠单抗联合铂类化疗在 mUC 的一线治疗中不具有成本效益。基于价值立场,预计阿替利珠单抗降价将提高 mUC 患者使用阿替利珠单抗的成本效益。