Suppr超能文献

阿替利珠单抗联合化疗作为转移性尿路上皮癌一线治疗的成本效益。

Cost-Effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.

Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2021 Jun;38(6):3399-3408. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01785-9. Epub 2021 May 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The IMvigor130 trial found that atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (atezolizumab group) as first-line therapy prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC), compared with placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy (placebo group). The current study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for mUC from the US payer perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model was adopted to compare the cost and effectiveness of atezolizumab and placebo group in the first-line setting of patients with mUC. Life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Subgroup, one-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the model robustness.

RESULTS

Atezolizumab group provided an additional 0.39 QALYs (0.52 LYs) and an incremental cost of $170,759 per QALY compared with the placebo group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $434,317 per QALY. Subgroup analysis indicated that PD-L1 expression of at least 5% on immune cells had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $325,236 per QALY. The results of one-way sensitivity analyses suggested that our model was sensitive to the cycle cost of atezolizumab and the hazard ratio of PFS. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that there was 0% probability of the atezolizumab group being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 per QALY. The extrapolations need to be validated by real-world data.

CONCLUSIONS

From the US payer perspective, atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy is not cost-effective in the first-line therapy for patients with mUC on the basis of a WTP threshold of $150,000 per QALY. On the basis of the value standpoint, price reduction of atezolizumab is expected to improve the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab in patients with mUC.

摘要

简介

IMvigor130 试验发现,与安慰剂加铂类化疗(安慰剂组)相比,阿替利珠单抗联合铂类化疗(阿替利珠单抗组)作为转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)的一线治疗可延长无进展生存期(PFS)。本研究旨在从美国支付者角度评估阿替利珠单抗联合铂类化疗作为 mUC 一线治疗的成本效益。

方法

采用 Markov 模型比较 mUC 患者一线治疗中阿替利珠单抗组和安慰剂组的成本和疗效。计算生命年(LYs)、质量调整生命年(QALYs)、终生成本和增量成本效益比(ICERs)。进行了亚组、单向和概率敏感性分析以探索模型稳健性。

结果

与安慰剂组相比,阿替利珠单抗组提供了额外的 0.39 QALYs(0.52 LYs)和 170759 美元/QALY 的增量成本。增量成本效益比为 434317 美元/QALY。亚组分析表明,免疫细胞上 PD-L1 表达至少为 5%的患者的增量成本效益比为 325236 美元/QALY。单向敏感性分析的结果表明,我们的模型对阿替利珠单抗的周期成本和 PFS 风险比敏感。概率敏感性分析表明,在 150000 美元/QALY 的意愿支付(WTP)阈值下,阿替利珠单抗组有 0%的可能性具有成本效益。需要通过真实世界的数据来验证外推。

结论

从美国支付者的角度来看,基于 150000 美元/QALY 的意愿支付阈值,阿替利珠单抗联合铂类化疗在 mUC 的一线治疗中不具有成本效益。基于价值立场,预计阿替利珠单抗降价将提高 mUC 患者使用阿替利珠单抗的成本效益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验