• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沿河区温室气体排放与植被类型和环境因素有关。

Greenhouse gas emissions from riparian zones are related to vegetation type and environmental factors.

机构信息

Environment and Climate Change Canada, 351, Boul. Saint-Joseph, Gatineau, Quebec, K1A 0H3, Canada.

School of Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2021 Jul;50(4):847-857. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20250. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1002/jeq2.20250
PMID:34019309
Abstract

Riparian zones provide multiple benefits, including streambank stabilization and nutrient abatement. However, there is a knowledge gap on how the type of vegetation and environmental factors (e.g., soil temperature, moisture) within the riparian zone influence CO and CH emissions. Our objective was to quantify and compare CO and CH emissions from a herbaceous (grass) riparian zone (GRS), a rehabilitated riparian zone composed of deciduous trees, an undisturbed natural forested riparian zone with deciduous trees (UNF-D) or coniferous trees (UNF-C), and an agricultural field. Cumulative soil CO emission ranged from 23 to 105 g CO -C m . Carbon dioxide emissions were greatest (p < .05) in the GRS zone and lowest (p < .05) in the UNF-C riparian zone. The best predictors for CO emissions were soil temperature and soil organic carbon (SOC) content. Cumulative CH emission ranged from -23 to 253 g CH -C m . Methane emissions were greatest (p < .05) in the UNF-D and lowest (p < .05) in the GRS riparian zone. The best predictors for CH emissions were soil moisture, SOC, and photosynthetic photon flux density. The total CO -C equivalent (i.e., CH + CO ) was greatest (p < .05) for the GRS and lowest (p < .05) for the UNF-C riparian zone. The environmental factors controlling CO and CH emissions within the various riparian zones did not change; instead, changes were due to how vegetation within riparian zones influenced these controls.

摘要

河岸带提供了多种益处,包括河岸稳定和养分去除。然而,关于河岸带内植被类型和环境因素(如土壤温度、湿度)如何影响 CO 和 CH 排放,我们的知识还存在差距。我们的目标是量化和比较草本(草)河岸带(GRS)、由落叶树组成的修复河岸带、具有落叶树(UNF-D)或针叶树(UNF-C)的未受干扰的天然河岸带以及农田的 CO 和 CH 排放。累积土壤 CO 排放量在 23 至 105 g CO -C m 之间。GRS 区的 CO 排放最大(p <.05),UNF-C 河岸带的 CO 排放最低(p <.05)。CO 排放的最佳预测因子是土壤温度和土壤有机碳(SOC)含量。累积 CH 排放量在-23 至 253 g CH -C m 之间。UNF-D 区的 CH 排放量最大(p <.05),GRS 区的 CH 排放量最低(p <.05)。CH 排放的最佳预测因子是土壤水分、SOC 和光合光子通量密度。CO -C 当量(即 CH + CO )在 GRS 中最大(p <.05),在 UNF-C 河岸带中最小(p <.05)。控制各种河岸带内 CO 和 CH 排放的环境因素没有变化;相反,变化是由于河岸带内植被如何影响这些控制因素。

相似文献

1
Greenhouse gas emissions from riparian zones are related to vegetation type and environmental factors.沿河区温室气体排放与植被类型和环境因素有关。
J Environ Qual. 2021 Jul;50(4):847-857. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20250. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
2
Vegetation Type Does not Affect Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Riparian Zones in Agricultural Landscapes.植被类型不会影响农业景观中河流带的一氧化二氮排放。
Environ Manage. 2021 Feb;67(2):371-383. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01419-w. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
3
Divergent effects of hydrological alteration and nutrient addition on greenhouse gas emissions in the water level fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China.水文改变和养分添加对中国三峡水库水位波动区温室气体排放的分歧影响。
Water Res. 2021 Aug 1;201:117308. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117308. Epub 2021 May 28.
4
Differential responses of temperature sensitivity of greenhouse gases emission to seasonal variations in plateau riparian zones.高原河滨带温室气体排放对季节变化的温度敏感性的差异响应。
Environ Pollut. 2024 Jul 15;353:124190. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124190. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Riparian land-use and rehabilitation: impact on organic matter input and soil respiration.河岸土地利用与恢复:对有机质输入和土壤呼吸的影响
Environ Manage. 2015 Feb;55(2):496-507. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0410-z. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
6
[Effects of harvest on greenhouse gas emissions from forested swamp during non-growing season in Xiaoxing'an Mountains of China.].[采伐对中国小兴安岭森林沼泽非生长季温室气体排放的影响。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 May;30(5):1713-1725. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201905.036.
7
Regulating autogenic vegetation in the riparian zone reduces carbon emissions: Evidence from a microcosm study.调控河岸带自生植被减少碳排放:一项微宇宙实验的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 20;840:156715. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156715. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
8
[Effects of Biochar Application Rates on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Purple Paddy Soil].生物炭施用量对紫色水稻土温室气体排放的影响
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2018 May 8;39(5):2351-2359. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201710033.
9
Greenhouse gas emissions from intact riparian wetland soil columns continuously loaded with nitrate solution: a laboratory microcosm study.连续加载硝酸盐溶液的完整河岸湿地土壤柱的温室气体排放:实验室微宇宙研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(32):33702-33714. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06406-1. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
10
The impact of a pulsing groundwater table on greenhouse gas emissions in riparian grey alder stands.脉动地下水位对河岸桤木林温室气体排放的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Feb;22(4):2360-71. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3427-1. Epub 2014 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Do NO, NO, N and CO fluxes differ in soils sourced from cropland and varying riparian buffer vegetation? An incubation study.来自农田和不同河岸缓冲带植被的土壤中一氧化氮、一氧化二氮、氮和一氧化碳通量是否存在差异?一项培养研究。
Soil Use Manag. 2024 Jan-Mar;40(1):e12951. doi: 10.1111/sum.12951. Epub 2023 Aug 2.