Suppr超能文献

免费供应基本药物的 2 年依从性:CLEAN Meds 随机临床试验。

Adherence at 2 years with distribution of essential medicines at no charge: The CLEAN Meds randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2021 May 21;18(5):e1003590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003590. eCollection 2021 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adherence to medicines is low for a variety of reasons, including the cost borne by patients. Some jurisdictions publicly fund medicines for the general population, but many jurisdictions do not, and such policies are contentious. To our knowledge, no trials studying free access to a wide range of medicines have been conducted.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We randomly assigned 786 primary care patients who reported not taking medicines due to cost between June 1, 2016 and April 28, 2017 to either free distribution of essential medicines (n = 395) or to usual medicine access (n = 391). The trial was conducted in Ontario, Canada, where hospital care and physician services are publicly funded for the general population but medicines are not. The trial population was mostly female (56%), younger than 65 years (83%), white (66%), and had a low income from wages as the primary source (56%). The primary outcome was medicine adherence after 2 years. Secondary outcomes included control of diabetes, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in patients taking relevant treatments and healthcare costs over 2 years. Adherence to all appropriate prescribed medicines was 38.7% in the free distribution group and 28.6% in the usual access group after 2 years (absolute difference 10.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3 to 16.9, p = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences in control of diabetes (hemoglobin A1c 0.27; 95% CI -0.25 to 0.79, p = 0.302), systolic blood pressure (-3.9; 95% CI -9.9 to 2.2, p = 0.210), or LDL cholesterol (0.26; 95% CI -0.08 to 0.60, p = 0.130) based on available data. Total healthcare costs over 2 years were lower with free distribution (difference in median CAN$1,117; 95% CI CAN$445 to CAN$1,778, p = 0.006). In the free distribution group, 51 participants experienced a serious adverse event, while 68 participants in the usual access group experienced a serious adverse event (p = 0.091). Participants were not blinded, and some outcomes depended on participant reports.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we observed that free distribution of essential medicines to patients with cost-related nonadherence substantially increased adherence, did not affect surrogate health outcomes, and reduced total healthcare costs over 2 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02744963.

摘要

背景

由于多种原因,包括患者承担的费用,人们对药物的依从性较低。一些司法管辖区为普通人群提供药品的公共资金,但许多司法管辖区没有,这种政策存在争议。据我们所知,没有研究广泛提供免费药品的试验。

方法和发现

我们于 2016 年 6 月 1 日至 2017 年 4 月 28 日期间随机分配了 786 名因费用而未服用药物的初级保健患者,这些患者报告称由于费用而未服用药物,将他们分为免费分配基本药物组(n = 395)或常规药物获取组(n = 391)。该试验在加拿大安大略省进行,该省为普通人群提供医院护理和医生服务,但不提供药品。试验人群主要为女性(56%),年龄在 65 岁以下(83%),白人(66%),主要收入来源为工资(56%)较低。主要结果是两年后药物的依从性。次要结果包括服用相关治疗药物的患者的糖尿病、血压和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇的控制情况,以及两年内的医疗保健费用。在两年后,免费分配组的所有适当处方药物的依从性为 38.7%,而常规获取组为 28.6%(绝对差异 10.1%;95%置信区间(CI)为 3.3 至 16.9,p = 0.004)。在控制糖尿病方面,没有统计学上的显著差异(血红蛋白 A1c 为 0.27;95%CI -0.25 至 0.79,p = 0.302)、收缩压(-3.9;95%CI -9.9 至 2.2,p = 0.210)或 LDL 胆固醇(0.26;95%CI -0.08 至 0.60,p = 0.130),基于可用数据。两年内的总医疗保健费用免费分配组较低(中位数 CAN$1117 的差异;95%CI CAN$445 至 CAN$1778,p = 0.006)。在免费分配组中,有 51 名参与者发生严重不良事件,而在常规获取组中,有 68 名参与者发生严重不良事件(p = 0.091)。参与者未设盲,并且一些结果取决于参与者的报告。

结论

在这项研究中,我们观察到向因费用而未服用药物的患者免费分配基本药物可显著提高药物的依从性,不会影响替代健康结果,并在两年内降低总医疗保健费用。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02744963。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7501/8139488/7b8130fe8590/pmed.1003590.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验