School of Construction and Environment Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Guang Dong, China.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Control & Treatment of Heavy Metal Pollution (Hong Kong Branch) and Water Technology Center, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Bioresour Technol. 2021 Sep;335:125266. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125266. Epub 2021 May 12.
This study conducted life-cycle evaluation (on the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, energy consumption and economic performance) and sensitivity analysis in nine scenarios considering the deployment of conventional anoxic/oxic (AO) and/or sludge-minimizing (OSA, SOSA) bioprocess for sewage treatment linking with subsequent sludge handling. The analysis results demonstrated that compared with conventional AO-based scenarios, OSA- and SOSA-based scenarios reduced 23-28% GHG emissions (GHGs) and 18-24% cost, despite no significant electricity consumption reduction. The scenario analysis indicates renewable energy and improving energy consumption efficiency benefit the application of OSA and SOSA. The perturbation analysis revealed that the influential factors related to energy consumption were sensitive to GHGs, energy consumption and economic effects.
本研究针对污水处理厂后续污泥处理,通过九个方案对常规缺氧/好氧(AO)和/或减泥(OSA、SOSA)生物工艺的部署进行了生命周期评价(包括温室气体 (GHG) 排放、能源消耗和经济性能)和敏感性分析。分析结果表明,与基于常规 AO 的方案相比,基于 OSA 和 SOSA 的方案减少了 23-28%的温室气体 (GHG) 排放和 18-24%的成本,尽管没有显著减少电力消耗。方案分析表明,可再生能源和提高能源利用效率有利于 OSA 和 SOSA 的应用。扰动分析表明,与能源消耗相关的影响因素对 GHG、能源消耗和经济效果较为敏感。