Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, RLAHA, Dyson Perrins Building, University of Oxford, OX13QY, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, RLAHA, Dyson Perrins Building, University of Oxford, OX13QY, Oxford, UK; Syft Technologies Ltd, 3 Craft Place, Middleton, PO Box 28 149, Christchurch 8242, New Zealand.
J Hum Evol. 2021 Jul;156:102996. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.102996. Epub 2021 May 18.
Radiocarbon dating of bone and charcoal from sites dating to the Middle and Upper Paleolithic is challenging due to low residual levels of radiocarbon. This means that small amounts of contaminating carbon can wield a great influence over accuracy unless they are fully removed. The site of Kabazi II in the Crimea is important because radiocarbon dates previously obtained from bones in archaeological horizons that date to the Western Crimean Mousterian (WCM) are surprisingly young. We redated the same samples using a single compound dating method that focuses on extracting and dating the amino acid hydroxyproline. We show that single amino acid dates produce significantly older determinations than those that use bulk collagen pretreatment procedures. Our results suggest that instead of dating to 35,000-40,000 cal BP, the bones actually date to >50,000 cal BP. This implies that the WCM at this site is much older than previously thought. In light of these current findings, we considered the dates of other key Crimean sites and concluded that in the absence of reliable pretreatment methods, it would be wise to consider many of them minimum ages. We conclude that there is little robust evidence to suggest Neanderthals were present in the Crimea after 40,000 cal BP.
由于放射性碳的残留水平低,对中石器时代和旧石器时代晚期的骨骼和木炭进行放射性碳年代测定具有挑战性。这意味着,除非完全去除,否则少量的污染碳可能会对准确性产生巨大影响。克里米亚的卡巴兹二世遗址很重要,因为之前从可追溯到克里米亚西部莫斯特文化时期(WCM)的考古层的骨骼中获得的放射性碳年代出人意料地年轻。我们使用一种专注于提取和测定氨基酸羟脯氨酸的单一化合物测年方法重新测定了相同的样本。我们发现,与使用批量胶原预处理程序相比,单一氨基酸日期产生的测定结果要老得多。我们的结果表明,这些骨骼的年代不是 35000-40000 年 cal BP,而是大于 50000 年 cal BP。这意味着该地点的 WCM 比之前认为的要古老得多。鉴于这些当前的发现,我们考虑了其他克里米亚关键遗址的日期,并得出结论,在缺乏可靠的预处理方法的情况下,明智的做法是将其中许多遗址视为最小年龄。我们的结论是,几乎没有确凿的证据表明尼安德特人在 40000 年 cal BP 后仍存在于克里米亚。