Tahara Y, Tanaka A, Yamamoto Y, Fukuda M, Kumahara Y, Shima K
Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Osaka University Medical School, Japan.
Diabetes Res. 1988 Apr;7(4):179-83.
To investigate the possible discrepancy between immunoreactive glucagon (IRG) levels measured by two glucagon-specific antisera, OAL-123 and 30K, fasting plasma IRG levels were measured in 30 diabetics (DM group), 56 patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT group) and 96 normal subjects (normal group). The fasting plasma IRG measured by OAL-123 (OAL-IRG) in DM, IGT and normal groups were 121 +/- 53, 125 +/- 43 and 119 +/- 57 pg/ml, whereas the fasting plasma IRG measured by 30K (30K-IRG) were 109 +/- 92, 92 +/- 44 and 91 +/- 68 pg/ml, respectively. There was no significant difference in the distribution of the fasting IRG levels among DM, IGT and normal groups. Although there was a statistically significant correlation between OAL- and 30K-IRG, their correlation coefficient was as small as 0.29, and 31 of 182 cases showed a large discrepancy exceeding 100 pg/ml between the two IRG values. The OAL- and 30K-IRG measured again six months later did not show a significant change, where the first and second IRG levels showed a good correlation (0.72 and 0.83 for OAL- and 30K-IRG, both p less than 0.001). The gel chromatography of the 14 plasma with fasting OAL-IRG higher than 200 pg/ml showed that the main contributor to the fasting IRG was the component of big plasma glucagon (BPG). These data suggest that there is a significant discrepancy in the fasting plasma IRG levels measured by the different glucagon antisera and that the discrepancy is caused by the different immunoreactivity of BPG to the different glucagon antisera.
为研究两种胰高血糖素特异性抗血清OAL - 123和30K所测免疫反应性胰高血糖素(IRG)水平之间可能存在的差异,对30例糖尿病患者(糖尿病组)、56例糖耐量受损患者(IGT组)和96例正常受试者(正常组)测定了空腹血浆IRG水平。糖尿病组、IGT组和正常组用OAL - 123所测空腹血浆IRG(OAL - IRG)分别为121±53、125±43和119±57 pg/ml,而用30K所测空腹血浆IRG(30K - IRG)分别为109±92、92±44和91±68 pg/ml。糖尿病组、IGT组和正常组空腹IRG水平分布无显著差异。虽然OAL - IRG和30K - IRG之间存在统计学显著相关性,但其相关系数仅为0.29,182例中有31例两种IRG值之间存在超过100 pg/ml的较大差异。6个月后再次测定的OAL - IRG和30K - IRG未显示出显著变化,首次和第二次IRG水平显示出良好的相关性(OAL - IRG和30K - IRG分别为0.72和0.83,均p<0.001)。对14份空腹OAL - IRG高于200 pg/ml的血浆进行凝胶色谱分析表明,空腹IRG的主要贡献成分是大血浆胰高血糖素(BPG)。这些数据表明,不同胰高血糖素抗血清所测空腹血浆IRG水平存在显著差异,且该差异是由BPG对不同胰高血糖素抗血清免疫反应性不同所致。