Proximal humeral fractures treated with an intramedullary cage and plate: clinical and radiographic outcomes at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively.

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures are common injuries. Although certain fracture types may benefit from surgery including open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF), the optimal method for fixation is unclear. Newer implant designs that improve healing by minimizing hardware failure and recurrent fracture displacement may optimize clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Over a 27-month period, 37 consecutive patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated by a single surgeon with a lateral humeral plate through which an intramedullary nitinol cage was inserted. Additional screws were placed through the tuberosities and cage as required. Fractures were classified by both the Neer classification and angulation or displacement in the coronal plane. At most recent follow-up, radiographic results, patient-reported outcome measurements, range of motion, complications, and reoperations were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients had a minimum of 1 year of clinical and radiographic follow-up. The average follow-up period was 91 weeks. By use of the Neer classification, there were 4 two-part, 21 three-part, and 6 four-part fractures. Twenty-one fractures were displaced in valgus and 10 in varus. Outcome measurements at most recent follow-up demonstrated an average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of 68; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score of 70; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score of 27; Veterans RAND-12 Physical Component Score of 37 and Mental Component Score of 51; Constant score of 55; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System score of 29; and Oxford Shoulder Score of 23. Average active range of motion showed forward elevation of 134°, abduction of 91°, external rotation with the arm at the side of 30° (range, -10° to 60°), and internal rotation with the arm at the side to L1 (range, T6-S4). There were 11 complications (35%), including 2 cases of axillary nerve neurapraxia that resolved and 4 cases of avascular necrosis (13%). Unplanned reoperations were performed in 6 patients (19%). One patient underwent revision for loose hardware removal, 1 patient underwent revision ORIF after a fall, and 4 patients required component removal and revision to shoulder arthroplasty. No screw cutout or varus head collapse occurred.

CONCLUSION

The management of proximal humeral fractures remains challenging. Our results demonstrate similar fracture healing, clinical improvement, and complication rates compared with conventional ORIF with screws and a side plate. At 1 year of follow-up, there were low rates of recurrent fracture displacement and screw cutout. There was a higher-than-expected rate of avascular necrosis as compared with other studies using a similar fixation construct. Larger studies and longer follow-up may demonstrate decreased rates of revision surgery and superior outcomes. Additional studies may determine whether this fixation method is superior to others for proximal humeral fractures.