Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; Changshu National Agro-Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China; Changshu National Agro-Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China; College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Aug 15;292:112772. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112772. Epub 2021 May 19.
Crop residue return is an effective, eco-friendly tillage method for decreasing reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses via surface runoff. However, the associated variation in Nr characteristics and its prospective mechanisms are not well understood. We systematically evaluated the response of Nr runoff loss and N variation in standing water to the abiotic and biotic parameters of soil in a paddy field after 6 years of straw return. Five experimental treatments of different fertilization strategies in combination with straw return were tested during the rice growth season. The results indicated that under equivalent fertilizer input, long-term straw return significantly reduced Nr runoff loss by 11.5% (P < 0.05), even though the loss increased with N fertilizer addition. We report that variations in abiotic soil properties (P < 0.05) and bacterial communities (P < 0.01) were both responsible for Nr loss differences between the rice growth stages and among the tested fertilizing patterns. Soil inorganic nitrogen (r = 0.18) had a significant positive influence on Nr runoff loss, but this effect was surpassed by the overall negative influence of soil organic carbon (r = -0.43), soil pH, (r = -0.40), and bacterial community composition (r = -0.14), which was especially apparent during the tillering stage. Our results emphasize the importance of jointly considering biotic and abiotic factors in soil and standing water when characterizing the effects of long-term straw return and N addition on Nr runoff loss, which will aid in mitigating N-based agricultural non-point pollution.
秸秆还田是一种有效的、环保的耕作方式,可以减少通过地表径流的活性氮(Nr)损失。然而,其与Nr 特征变化及其潜在机制的相关研究还不是很清楚。我们系统地评估了 6 年来秸秆还田后稻田中Nr 地表径流损失和积水期氮变化对土壤非生物和生物参数的响应。在水稻生长季,测试了 5 种不同施肥策略与秸秆还田相结合的实验处理。结果表明,在等量肥料投入的情况下,长期秸秆还田可显著降低 11.5%的 Nr 地表径流损失(P < 0.05),尽管随着氮肥的添加,损失会增加。我们报告说,土壤理化性质(P < 0.05)和细菌群落(P < 0.01)的变化都导致了水稻生长阶段和不同施肥模式之间 Nr 损失的差异。土壤无机氮(r = 0.18)对 Nr 地表径流损失有显著的正向影响,但这种影响被土壤有机碳(r = -0.43)、土壤 pH(r = -0.40)和细菌群落组成(r = -0.14)的综合负向影响所超越,这在分蘖期尤为明显。我们的研究结果强调了在描述长期秸秆还田和氮添加对 Nr 地表径流损失的影响时,综合考虑土壤和积水期生物和非生物因素的重要性,这将有助于减轻基于氮的农业面源污染。