Suppr超能文献

药师干预对糖尿病门诊患者糖化血红蛋白再升高的影响。

Influence of Pharmacist Intervention on Re-Elevation of Glycated Hemoglobin for Diabetic Outpatients.

作者信息

Maiguma Takayoshi, Komoto Atsushi, Shiraga Emi, Hagiwara Sae, Onishi Junko, Li Miyoshi, Teshima Daisuke

机构信息

Shujitsu University, Okayama, Japan.

HITO Hospital, Ehime, Japan.

出版信息

Hosp Pharm. 2021 Jun;56(3):191-197. doi: 10.1177/0018578719883806. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

Abstract

The effect of pharmacist intervention on blood sugar control in diabetic outpatients in a pharmacist-managed clinic was studied by focusing on the re-elevation of the glycated hemoglobin (A1c) level defined as a continuous variable. : A retrospective chart review was performed at the Mizushima Kyodo Hospital from April 2014 to March 2016. Of the 221 diabetic outpatients who were provided guidance by nurses and nutritional managers, 62 further consulted the pharmacist-managed clinic. The remaining 159 patients were enrolled in a nonintervention group. Finally, the data of 115 patients with A1c level of ≥7.5% and A1c re-elevation were extracted. Intergroup comparison was performed between the pharmacist intervention (n = 26) and nonintervention (n = 89) groups. In both the groups, the starting point (baseline) was the time when the A1c level of ≥7.5% was observed. Subsequent monitoring was performed once in every 3 months. The average cumulative level of A1c re-elevation (CARE) was compared between groups. Patients with A1c level of ≥8.0% and A1c level between 7.5% and 8.0%, and male and female patients were also compared. Furthermore, the number of days until the re-elevation of the A1c level from the baseline was also compared. : The CARE values were 0.89 ± 0.86% and 1.51 ± 1.25% in the pharmacist intervention and nonintervention groups, respectively, showing a significant difference ( = .0195). There were no significant differences between patients with A1c level of ≥8.0% and A1c level between 7.5% and 8.0%, or between males and females. The number of days until the re-elevation of A1c level from the baseline also showed no significant difference. Pharmacist intervention for diabetic outpatients in pharmacist-managed clinics significantly suppressed CARE when compared with effects of no intervention, and this could be useful for preventing the exacerbation of diabetes.

摘要

通过将糖化血红蛋白(A1c)水平的再次升高定义为连续变量,研究了药师干预对药师管理诊所中糖尿病门诊患者血糖控制的影响。:2014年4月至2016年3月在水岛协同医院进行了一项回顾性病历审查。在221名接受护士和营养管理人员指导的糖尿病门诊患者中,有62人进一步咨询了药师管理诊所。其余159名患者被纳入非干预组。最后,提取了115名A1c水平≥7.5%且A1c再次升高的患者的数据。在药师干预组(n = 26)和非干预组(n = 89)之间进行组间比较。在两组中,起点(基线)是观察到A1c水平≥7.5%的时间。随后每3个月进行一次监测。比较两组之间A1c再次升高的平均累积水平(CARE)。还比较了A1c水平≥8.0%和A1c水平在7.5%至8.0%之间的患者,以及男性和女性患者。此外,还比较了从基线到A1c水平再次升高的天数。:药师干预组和非干预组的CARE值分别为0.89±0.86%和1.51±1.25%,显示出显著差异(P = 0.0195)。A1c水平≥8.0%和A1c水平在7.5%至8.0%之间的患者之间,或男性和女性之间没有显著差异。从基线到A1c水平再次升高的天数也没有显著差异。与无干预的效果相比,药师管理诊所对糖尿病门诊患者的药师干预显著抑制了CARE,这可能有助于预防糖尿病的恶化。

相似文献

10
Impact of a clinical pharmacist on provider prescribing patterns in a primary care clinic.临床药师对初级保健诊所医生处方模式的影响。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Jan-Feb;62(1):209-213.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of drugs on hypoglycaemia in hospitalised patients.药物对住院患者低血糖的影响。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Jul;26(4):199-204. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001375. Epub 2018 Mar 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验