• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Influence of Pharmacist Intervention on Re-Elevation of Glycated Hemoglobin for Diabetic Outpatients.药师干预对糖尿病门诊患者糖化血红蛋白再升高的影响。
Hosp Pharm. 2021 Jun;56(3):191-197. doi: 10.1177/0018578719883806. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
2
Evaluation of Outcomes of a Pharmacist-Run, Outpatient Insulin Titration Telepharmacy Service.药师主导的门诊胰岛素滴定远程药学服务的结果评估。
Innov Pharm. 2019 Aug 31;10(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v10i2.1737. eCollection 2019.
3
An analysis of the assessment of glycated hemoglobin using A1cNow+ point-of-care device compared to central laboratory testing--an important addition to pharmacist-managed diabetes programs?与中心实验室检测相比,使用A1cNow+即时检测设备评估糖化血红蛋白——这是药剂师管理的糖尿病项目的一项重要补充?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Sep;2(5):828-30. doi: 10.1177/193229680800200513.
4
Impact of pharmacist-managed erythropoiesis-stimulating agents clinics for patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD.非透析依赖型 CKD 患者的药师管理促红细胞生成素刺激剂治疗门诊的影响。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Sep;60(3):371-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 May 26.
5
Clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective analysis of pharmacist-managed diabetes care vs. usual medical care.2型糖尿病中的临床惰性:药剂师管理的糖尿病护理与常规医疗护理的回顾性分析。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2013 Oct;11(4):203-10. doi: 10.4321/s1886-36552013000400005. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
6
Impact of Ambulatory Care Pharmacist-Led Diabetes Mellitus Management on Hemoglobin A1c Values Among Patients With Diabetes in a Primary Care Clinic Over Two Years.两年间初级保健诊所中由门诊护理药师主导的糖尿病管理对糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白值的影响。
Innov Pharm. 2022 Dec 12;13(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v13i2.4815. eCollection 2022.
7
Efficacy of a pharmacist-managed diabetes clinic in high-risk diabetes patients, a randomized controlled trial - "Pharm-MD" : Impact of clinical pharmacists in diabetes care.高风险糖尿病患者中药师管理糖尿病诊所的疗效:一项随机对照试验——“Pharm-MD”:临床药师在糖尿病护理中的作用。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 Mar 16;22(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-00983-y.
8
Home medication management review in outpatients with chronic diseases in Jordan: a randomized control trial.约旦慢性病门诊患者的家庭用药管理评估:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Apr;38(2):404-13. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0266-9. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
9
Feasibility of a Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial to Address Health Literacy, Beliefs, Medication Adherence, and Self-Efficacy (ADHERE) in a Clinical Pharmacist-Led Clinic.一项随机对照混合方法试验在临床药师主导诊所中解决健康素养、信念、药物依从性和自我效能(ADHERE)问题的可行性。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Mar 10;16:679-696. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S349258. eCollection 2022.
10
Impact of a clinical pharmacist on provider prescribing patterns in a primary care clinic.临床药师对初级保健诊所医生处方模式的影响。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Jan-Feb;62(1):209-213.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Gaps of Medication Treatment Management Between Guidelines and Real-World for Inpatients With Type 2 Diabetes in China From Pharmacist's Perspective.从药师角度看中国 2 型糖尿病住院患者药物治疗管理在指南与真实世界之间的差距。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 May 30;13:900114. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.900114. eCollection 2022.
2
A Pharmacist-Driven Glycemic Control Protocol to Reduce the Rate of Severe Hypoglycemia in High-Risk Patients.一项由药剂师主导的血糖控制方案,用于降低高危患者严重低血糖的发生率。
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Feb;57(1):45-51. doi: 10.1177/0018578720973891. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of drugs on hypoglycaemia in hospitalised patients.药物对住院患者低血糖的影响。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Jul;26(4):199-204. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001375. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
2
Medication regimen complexity and its impact on medication adherence and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an Ethiopian general hospital.在埃塞俄比亚一家综合医院中,2 型糖尿病患者的药物治疗方案复杂性及其对药物依从性和血糖控制的影响。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Jun 28;7(1):e000685. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000685. eCollection 2019.
3
Impact of a Community Pharmacist-Delivered Information Program on the Follow-up of Type-2 Diabetic Patients: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Study.社区药剂师提供信息方案对 2 型糖尿病患者随访的影响:一项整群随机对照研究。
Adv Ther. 2019 Jun;36(6):1291-1303. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00957-y. Epub 2019 May 2.
4
Impact of a novel pharmacist-delivered behavioral intervention for patients with poorly-controlled diabetes: The ENhancing outcomes through Goal Assessment and Generating Engagement in Diabetes Mellitus (ENGAGE-DM) pragmatic randomized trial.新型药剂师提供的行为干预对血糖控制不佳的糖尿病患者的影响:通过目标评估和提高糖尿病患者参与度来改善结局的实用随机试验(ENGAGE-DM)。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 2;14(4):e0214754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214754. eCollection 2019.
5
Community pharmacist-led interventions and their impact on patients' medication adherence and other health outcomes: a systematic review.社区药剂师主导的干预措施及其对患者药物依从性和其他健康结局的影响:一项系统评价
Int J Pharm Pract. 2018 Oct;26(5):387-397. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12462. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
6
Efficacy of Pharmacist Based Diabetes Educational Interventions on Clinical Outcomes of Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Network Meta-Analysis.基于药剂师的糖尿病教育干预对2型糖尿病成年患者临床结局的疗效:一项网状Meta分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Apr 10;9:339. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00339. eCollection 2018.
7
Assessment of medication adherence among type 2 diabetic patients in Quetta city, Pakistan.巴基斯坦奎达市2型糖尿病患者药物依从性评估
Postgrad Med. 2017 Aug;129(6):637-643. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1328251. Epub 2017 May 24.
8
Pharmacist Interventions in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.药师干预在 2 型糖尿病管理中的作用:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 May;22(5):493-515. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.5.493.
9
Pharmacist-managed clinics for patient education and counseling in Japan: current status and future perspectives.日本由药剂师管理的患者教育与咨询诊所:现状与未来展望。
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2015 Jan 28;1:2. doi: 10.1186/s40780-014-0001-4. eCollection 2015.
10
Basal-Supported Oral Therapy with Sitagliptin Counteracts Rebound Hyperglycemia Caused by GLP-1 Tachyphylaxis.西格列汀基底支持口服治疗可对抗 GLP-1 脱敏引起的反弹性高血糖。
Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:927317. doi: 10.1155/2014/927317. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

药师干预对糖尿病门诊患者糖化血红蛋白再升高的影响。

Influence of Pharmacist Intervention on Re-Elevation of Glycated Hemoglobin for Diabetic Outpatients.

作者信息

Maiguma Takayoshi, Komoto Atsushi, Shiraga Emi, Hagiwara Sae, Onishi Junko, Li Miyoshi, Teshima Daisuke

机构信息

Shujitsu University, Okayama, Japan.

HITO Hospital, Ehime, Japan.

出版信息

Hosp Pharm. 2021 Jun;56(3):191-197. doi: 10.1177/0018578719883806. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1177/0018578719883806
PMID:34024928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8114298/
Abstract

The effect of pharmacist intervention on blood sugar control in diabetic outpatients in a pharmacist-managed clinic was studied by focusing on the re-elevation of the glycated hemoglobin (A1c) level defined as a continuous variable. : A retrospective chart review was performed at the Mizushima Kyodo Hospital from April 2014 to March 2016. Of the 221 diabetic outpatients who were provided guidance by nurses and nutritional managers, 62 further consulted the pharmacist-managed clinic. The remaining 159 patients were enrolled in a nonintervention group. Finally, the data of 115 patients with A1c level of ≥7.5% and A1c re-elevation were extracted. Intergroup comparison was performed between the pharmacist intervention (n = 26) and nonintervention (n = 89) groups. In both the groups, the starting point (baseline) was the time when the A1c level of ≥7.5% was observed. Subsequent monitoring was performed once in every 3 months. The average cumulative level of A1c re-elevation (CARE) was compared between groups. Patients with A1c level of ≥8.0% and A1c level between 7.5% and 8.0%, and male and female patients were also compared. Furthermore, the number of days until the re-elevation of the A1c level from the baseline was also compared. : The CARE values were 0.89 ± 0.86% and 1.51 ± 1.25% in the pharmacist intervention and nonintervention groups, respectively, showing a significant difference ( = .0195). There were no significant differences between patients with A1c level of ≥8.0% and A1c level between 7.5% and 8.0%, or between males and females. The number of days until the re-elevation of A1c level from the baseline also showed no significant difference. Pharmacist intervention for diabetic outpatients in pharmacist-managed clinics significantly suppressed CARE when compared with effects of no intervention, and this could be useful for preventing the exacerbation of diabetes.

摘要

通过将糖化血红蛋白(A1c)水平的再次升高定义为连续变量,研究了药师干预对药师管理诊所中糖尿病门诊患者血糖控制的影响。:2014年4月至2016年3月在水岛协同医院进行了一项回顾性病历审查。在221名接受护士和营养管理人员指导的糖尿病门诊患者中,有62人进一步咨询了药师管理诊所。其余159名患者被纳入非干预组。最后,提取了115名A1c水平≥7.5%且A1c再次升高的患者的数据。在药师干预组(n = 26)和非干预组(n = 89)之间进行组间比较。在两组中,起点(基线)是观察到A1c水平≥7.5%的时间。随后每3个月进行一次监测。比较两组之间A1c再次升高的平均累积水平(CARE)。还比较了A1c水平≥8.0%和A1c水平在7.5%至8.0%之间的患者,以及男性和女性患者。此外,还比较了从基线到A1c水平再次升高的天数。:药师干预组和非干预组的CARE值分别为0.89±0.86%和1.51±1.25%,显示出显著差异(P = 0.0195)。A1c水平≥8.0%和A1c水平在7.5%至8.0%之间的患者之间,或男性和女性之间没有显著差异。从基线到A1c水平再次升高的天数也没有显著差异。与无干预的效果相比,药师管理诊所对糖尿病门诊患者的药师干预显著抑制了CARE,这可能有助于预防糖尿病的恶化。