磁共振成像在预测前交叉韧带撕裂位置和撕裂程度方面的准确性。

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting anterior cruciate ligament tear location and tear degree.

作者信息

Shu Henry T, Wegener Nicholas R, Connors Katherine M, Yang Daniel S, Lockey Stephen D, Thomas Jennifer M, Argintar Evan H

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.

School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2021 May 6;25:129-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.002. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.002

PMID:34025056

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8129892/

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting the location of ACL tears in preoperative planning for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients who underwent ACL repair were retrospectively analyzed to compare intraoperative arthroscopic findings with preoperative MRIs.

RESULTS

For identifying type I tears, the sensitivity of MRI was 9.0% and the accuracy of MRI was 8.8%. There was moderate interrater agreement between MRI findings for tear location and tear degree.

CONCLUSION

MRI alone may not necessarily be accurate in identifying which ACL tears are amenable to repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series; Level of Evidence: IV.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估磁共振成像（MRI）在预测前交叉韧带（ACL）修复术前计划中ACL撕裂位置的可靠性。

方法

回顾性分析34例行ACL修复术的患者，将术中关节镜检查结果与术前MRI进行比较。

结果

对于识别I型撕裂，MRI的敏感性为9.0%，准确性为8.8%。MRI对撕裂位置和撕裂程度的检查结果之间存在中等程度的评分者间一致性。

结论

仅靠MRI不一定能准确识别哪些ACL撕裂适合修复。

研究设计

回顾性病例系列；证据等级：IV级。

相似文献

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting anterior cruciate ligament tear location and tear degree.

J Orthop. 2021 May 6;25:129-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.002. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.

Primary anterior cruciate ligament repair: magnetic resonance imaging characterisation of reparable lesions and correlation with arthroscopy.

Eur Radiol. 2022 Jan;32(1):582-592. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08155-7. Epub 2021 Jul 13.

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predicts eligibility for arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb;26(2):660-671. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4646-z. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

Distal remnant length can be measured reliably and predicts primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Sep;29(9):2967-2975. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06312-x. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

A Radiographic Assessment of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict Graft Integrity?

Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1652-60. doi: 10.1177/0363546514532335. Epub 2014 May 12.

The Location of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: A Prevalence Study Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Jun 22;5(6):2325967117709966. doi: 10.1177/2325967117709966. eCollection 2017 Jun.

Is a Partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Truly Partial? A Clinical, Arthroscopic, and Histologic Investigation.

Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1706-1713. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.037. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

High prevalence of a deep lateral femoral notch sign in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and concomitant posterior root tears of the lateral meniscus.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Apr;29(4):1018-1024. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06071-9. Epub 2020 May 21.

A new method for diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tear: MRI with maximum flexion of knee in the prone position: A case control study.

Int J Surg. 2019 Aug;68:142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Jul 2.

Timing of magnetic resonance imaging affects the accuracy and interobserver agreement of anterolateral ligament tears detection in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees.

Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 Nov 27;32(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-00082-z.

引用本文的文献

Reliability of Preoperative MRI in the Prediction of ACL Tear Type.

Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 4;13(6):23259671251339491. doi: 10.1177/23259671251339491. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Orthop Res Rev. 2024 Oct 5;16:233-242. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S450336. eCollection 2024.

The Functional Integrity of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Can Be Objectively Assessed With the Use of Stress Radiographs: A Systematic Review.

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Apr 25;12(4):23259671241246197. doi: 10.1177/23259671241246197. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Using Suture Tape Augmentation: A Case Series of 29 Patients With Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

Arthroscopy. 2021 Apr;37(4):1235-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.034. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Retensioning-A Novel Revision Procedure Using Suture Augmentation: A Case Report With A 3-Year Follow-up.

JBJS Case Connect. 2020 Apr-Jun;10(2):e0092. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.CC.19.00092.

Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears seems safe but higher level of evidence is needed: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent literature.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jun;28(6):1946-1957. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05697-8. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear.

N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2341-2348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1805931.

ACL Repair With Suture Ligament Augmentation Is Associated With a High Failure Rate Among Adolescent Patients.

Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):560-566. doi: 10.1177/0363546518825255. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

Long-term Outcomes of Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Combined With Biologic Healing Augmentation to Treat Incomplete Tears.

Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3368-3377. doi: 10.1177/0363546518805740. Epub 2018 Nov 6.

Anterior cruciate ligament repair with Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement: a case series with 2-year follow-up.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):60-67. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5239-1. Epub 2018 Oct 31.

Diagnostic Evaluation of the Knee in the Office Setting Using Small-Bore Needle Arthroscopy.

Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Dec 11;7(1):e17-e21. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.08.044. eCollection 2018 Jan.

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Primary Repair of Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Are Maintained at Mid-term Follow-up.

Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1085-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.028. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

Office-Based Needle Arthroscopy: A Standardized Diagnostic Approach to the Knee.

Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Jul 24;6(4):e1119-e1124. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.03.031. eCollection 2017 Aug.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

磁共振成像在预测前交叉韧带撕裂位置和撕裂程度方面的准确性。

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting anterior cruciate ligament tear location and tear degree.

作者信息

Shu Henry T, Wegener Nicholas R, Connors Katherine M, Yang Daniel S, Lockey Stephen D, Thomas Jennifer M, Argintar Evan H

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.

School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2021 May 6;25:129-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.002. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.002

PMID:34025056

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8129892/

Abstract

PURPOSE

METHODS

Thirty-four patients who underwent ACL repair were retrospectively analyzed to compare intraoperative arthroscopic findings with preoperative MRIs.

RESULTS

For identifying type I tears, the sensitivity of MRI was 9.0% and the accuracy of MRI was 8.8%. There was moderate interrater agreement between MRI findings for tear location and tear degree.

CONCLUSION

MRI alone may not necessarily be accurate in identifying which ACL tears are amenable to repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series; Level of Evidence: IV.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估磁共振成像（MRI）在预测前交叉韧带（ACL）修复术前计划中ACL撕裂位置的可靠性。

方法

回顾性分析34例行ACL修复术的患者，将术中关节镜检查结果与术前MRI进行比较。

结果

对于识别I型撕裂，MRI的敏感性为9.0%，准确性为8.8%。MRI对撕裂位置和撕裂程度的检查结果之间存在中等程度的评分者间一致性。

结论

仅靠MRI不一定能准确识别哪些ACL撕裂适合修复。

研究设计

回顾性病例系列；证据等级：IV级。

磁共振成像在预测前交叉韧带撕裂位置和撕裂程度方面的准确性。

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting anterior cruciate ligament tear location and tear degree.

作者信息

机构信息

出版信息

PURPOSE

METHODS

RESULTS

CONCLUSION

STUDY DESIGN

目的

方法

结果

结论

研究设计

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

用中文搜PubMed

文档翻译

Suppr 超能文献

磁共振成像在预测前交叉韧带撕裂位置和撕裂程度方面的准确性。

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting anterior cruciate ligament tear location and tear degree.

作者信息

机构信息

出版信息

PURPOSE

METHODS

RESULTS

CONCLUSION

STUDY DESIGN

目的

方法

结果

结论

研究设计