• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉旁路移植术中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期疗效

Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions within coronary artery bypass grafts.

作者信息

Januszek Rafał, Siudak Zbigniew, Dziewierz Artur, Rakowski Tomasz, Dudek Dariusz, Bartuś Stanisław

机构信息

Department of Clinical Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education, Krakow, Poland.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2019 Jan 30;17(3):628-637. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2018.75608. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.5114/aoms.2018.75608
PMID:34025832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8130480/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) within coronary artery bypasses are still poor as compared to those within native coronary arteries. Thus, we aimed to assess predictors of long-term clinical outcomes after PCIs of coronary bypasses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We enrolled 194 patients after PCIs of coronary artery bypasses at the mean age of 69.5 ±8.3 years (73.2% male). The primary study endpoint was a combination of target-vessel revascularization (TVR), target-lesion revascularization (TLR), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and death. The mean follow-up was 964 ±799.1 days and was completed among 156 patients. Multivariate analysis was used to assess determinants of study endpoints during follow-up. Moreover, we compared survival curves according to the type of PCI and presence of anti-embolic protection.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint of the study occurred in 59.7% of patients after the mean time of 669.6 ±598.7 days. The TVR occurred in 37.9% of individuals, TLR in 24.2%, MI in 26.3%, stroke in 4.2%, CABG in 2.1% and death in 30.5% of patients. In Cox multivariate analysis, PCI of two or more bypasses ( < 0.01), post-dilatation ( < 0.05) and no-reflow ( < 0.05) were the independent determinants of the primary study endpoint. No significant impact of anti-embolic protection devices on long-term outcomes was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous coronary interventions of two or more bypasses, post-dilatation and no-reflow are predictors of worse outcome in patients undergoing PCI within coronary artery bypass grafts.

摘要

引言

与在原生冠状动脉内进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相比,在冠状动脉旁路移植术中进行PCI的长期预后仍然较差。因此,我们旨在评估冠状动脉旁路移植术PCI术后长期临床预后的预测因素。

材料与方法

我们纳入了194例接受冠状动脉旁路移植术PCI术后的患者,平均年龄为69.5±8.3岁(男性占73.2%)。主要研究终点是靶血管血运重建(TVR)、靶病变血运重建(TLR)、心肌梗死(MI)、中风、冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和死亡的综合情况。平均随访时间为964±799.1天,156例患者完成了随访。采用多变量分析评估随访期间研究终点的决定因素。此外,我们根据PCI类型和抗栓保护装置的使用情况比较了生存曲线。

结果

研究的主要终点在平均669.6±598.7天之后出现在59.7%的患者中。TVR发生在37.9%的个体中,TLR发生在24.2%,MI发生在26.3%,中风发生在4.2%,CABG发生在2.1%,死亡发生在30.5%的患者中。在Cox多变量分析中,两条或更多旁路的PCI(<0.01)、后扩张(<0.05)和无复流(<0.05)是主要研究终点的独立决定因素。未观察到抗栓保护装置对长期预后有显著影响。

结论

两条或更多旁路的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、后扩张和无复流是冠状动脉旁路移植术内行PCI患者预后较差的预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef7/8130480/0e8283b8e6c5/AMS-17-3-87146-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef7/8130480/ceb93602b840/AMS-17-3-87146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef7/8130480/f186fac8f0b8/AMS-17-3-87146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef7/8130480/0e8283b8e6c5/AMS-17-3-87146-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef7/8130480/ceb93602b840/AMS-17-3-87146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef7/8130480/f186fac8f0b8/AMS-17-3-87146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cef7/8130480/0e8283b8e6c5/AMS-17-3-87146-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions within coronary artery bypass grafts.冠状动脉旁路移植术中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期疗效
Arch Med Sci. 2019 Jan 30;17(3):628-637. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2018.75608. eCollection 2021.
2
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
3
Clinical outcome after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in coronary bypass graft failure.冠状动脉旁路移植失败后手术或经皮血运重建的临床转归。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2013 Jun;14(6):438-45. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328356a4fc.
4
Incidence, Characteristics, Predictors, and Outcomes of Repeat Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The SYNTAX Trial at 5 Years.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术后重复血运重建的发生率、特征、预测因素和结果:SYNTAX 试验 5 年随访。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2493-2507. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.09.044.
5
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention in a 'real-world' setting: a comparative effectiveness study based on propensity score-matched cohorts.在真实世界环境中冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较效果研究:基于倾向评分匹配队列的比较研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jul;44(1):e16-24. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt197. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
6
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Native Coronary Arteries Versus Bypass Grafts in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中的应用:来自退伍军人事务部临床评估、报告和跟踪计划的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May 9;9(9):884-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.034. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
7
Long-term outcomes of three-vessel coronary artery disease after coronary revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention using second-generation drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery.使用第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术对三支血管冠状动脉疾病进行冠状动脉血运重建后的长期结局
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Apr;35(2):194-202. doi: 10.1007/s12928-019-00599-5. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
8
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for ostial/midshaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery from the DELTA registry: a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.DELTA 注册研究:非保护左主干冠状动脉开口/中段病变行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期临床结果:多中心注册研究评估左主干病变的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr;7(4):354-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.014. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
9
Impact of target vessel choice on outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with a prior coronary artery bypass graft.既往有冠状动脉旁路移植术患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中靶血管选择对预后的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 15;98(6):E785-E795. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29935. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
10
Comparison of Five-Year Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Triple-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease (from the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗三支血管冠状动脉疾病的五年疗效比较(来自京都经皮冠状动脉介入治疗/冠状动脉旁路移植术注册队列-2的冠状动脉血运重建疗效研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jul 1;116(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.040. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Platelet reactivity expressed as a novel platelet reactivity score is associated with higher inflammatory state after coronary artery bypass grafting.以一种新型血小板反应性评分表示的血小板反应性与冠状动脉搭桥术后较高的炎症状态相关。
Arch Med Sci. 2019 Dec 12;19(2):392-400. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.90470. eCollection 2023.
2
Short-term outcomes of drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for saphenous vein graft lesions in coronary heart disease.药物涂层球囊与药物洗脱支架治疗冠心病大隐静脉桥病变的短期疗效
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 6;10:982880. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.982880. eCollection 2023.
3
The effects of botulinum toxin A and papaverine on human saphenous vein and internal mammary artery grafts: an study.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of periprocedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions within coronary artery bypass grafts.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠状动脉旁路移植术中围手术期并发症的预测因素。
Cardiol J. 2019;26(6):633-644. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0044. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
2
The impact of clinical and angiographic factors on percutaneous coronary angioplasty outcomes in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.临床和血管造影因素对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的影响。
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2016 Dec 30;1(1):e150-e157. doi: 10.5114/amsad.2016.64935. eCollection 2016.
3
A型肉毒杆菌毒素和罂粟碱对人隐静脉及乳内动脉移植物的影响:一项研究
Arch Med Sci. 2021 Mar 24;18(6):1607-1616. doi: 10.5114/aoms/110157. eCollection 2022.
Clinical SYNTAX Score - a good predictor for renal artery stenosis in acute myocardial infarction patients: analysis from the REN-ACS trial.
临床SYNTAX评分——急性心肌梗死患者肾动脉狭窄的良好预测指标:来自REN-ACS试验的分析
Arch Med Sci. 2017 Jun;13(4):837-844. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.60374. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
4
The importance of two metabolic syndrome diagnostic criteria and body fat distribution in predicting clinical severity and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction.两种代谢综合征诊断标准及体脂分布在预测急性心肌梗死临床严重程度和预后中的重要性。
Arch Med Sci. 2017 Jun;13(4):795-806. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.59703. Epub 2016 May 5.
5
Long Term Outcomes of MGuard Stent Deployment in Saphenous Vein Grafts and Native Coronary Arteries: A Single Center Experience.MGuard支架在隐静脉桥和自身冠状动脉中植入的长期预后:单中心经验
Isr Med Assoc J. 2017 Mar;19(3):172-176.
6
Drug Coated Balloon Is Less Effective for Treatment of DES In-Stent Restenosis Both in Native Coronary Arteries and Saphenous Vein Grafts: Results From a Bicenter Registry.药物涂层球囊治疗原发性冠状动脉和大隐静脉移植血管中药物洗脱支架内再狭窄疗效欠佳:一项双中心注册研究结果
J Interv Cardiol. 2016 Oct;29(5):461-468. doi: 10.1111/joic.12324. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
7
Saphenous vein graft intervention.隐静脉移植介入治疗。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug;4(8):831-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.05.014.
8
5-year follow-up of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents compared with bare-metal stents in aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts the randomized BARRICADE (barrier approach to restenosis: restrict intima to curtail adverse events) trial.5 年随访:聚四氟乙烯覆膜支架与裸金属支架在冠状动脉大隐静脉桥的应用比较——BARRICADE(限制内膜增生以减少不良事件的屏障方法)随机试验
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Mar;4(3):300-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.11.013.
9
Continued benefit from paclitaxel-eluting compared with bare-metal stent implantation in saphenous vein graft lesions during long-term follow-up of the SOS (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts) trial.在 SOS(静脉桥血管支架置入术)试验的长期随访中,紫杉醇洗脱支架与裸金属支架置入相比,在静脉桥病变中持续获益。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Feb;4(2):176-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.003.
10
Safety and efficacy of drug eluting stents compared with bare metal stents for saphenous vein graft interventions: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies comprising 7,994 patients.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架治疗隐静脉桥血管介入治疗的安全性和有效性的综合荟萃分析:包括 7994 例患者的随机试验和观察性研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Feb 15;77(3):343-55. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22720. Epub 2010 Nov 2.