Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的Endoloops:一项回顾性成本效益分析。

Endoloops in laparoscopic appendicectomy: A retrospective, cost effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Sheen Jonathon R C, Bowen Joel M, Bowling Kirk K

机构信息

Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Department of Upper G.I. Surgery, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Apr 29;65:102364. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102364. eCollection 2021 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over 50,000 appendicectomies are performed in the UK annually. Despite this highvolume. status, and the endoloop being commonly employed, there is a scarcity of literature studying differences in outcomes depending on numbers used.The aim of this study was to investigate whether a significant difference in complication rate exists where different numbers of endoloop ligatures have been applied to the appendiceal base during laparoscopic appendicectomy, and to analyse for potential cost saving.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of appendicectomies at our centre in one year, providing a sample of 254 patients. Each was followed up for complications in the 30 days post discharge and graded using the Clavien-Dindo system. Our null hypothesis of no difference in complication rate was tested using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Of 254 patients, 59 were excluded due to open approach, non-endoloop method, or lack of available record, leaving a population of 195. The result of the two-tailed P value equalled 1.000, indicating no statistically significant difference in complication rate whether one or two endoloops were used. An endoloop costs £13.59. If the 62 cases in which 2 endoloops were used to secure the base had utilised a single endoloop, this would amount to a saving of £842.58.

CONCLUSION

Our study set out to assess whether the complication rate differs in cases where one or two endoloops have been applied. Retrospective statistical analysis found no significant difference between groups. Therefore, we recommend use of one endoloop to secure the base in laparoscopic appendicectomy.

摘要

背景

英国每年进行超过50000例阑尾切除术。尽管手术量很大,且endo-loop(一种医疗器械,文中未明确中文名称,暂保留英文)被广泛使用,但研究不同使用数量的结局差异的文献却很匮乏。本研究的目的是调查在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中,对阑尾根部使用不同数量的endo-loop结扎时,并发症发生率是否存在显著差异,并分析潜在的成本节约情况。

方法

我们对本中心一年内进行的阑尾切除术进行了回顾性分析,共纳入254例患者作为样本。对每位患者在出院后30天内进行并发症随访,并使用Clavien-Dindo系统进行分级。我们使用Fisher精确检验来检验并发症发生率无差异的零假设。

结果

254例患者中,59例因采用开放手术、非endo-loop方法或缺乏可用记录而被排除,最终纳入195例患者。双尾P值结果为1.000,表明无论使用一个还是两个endo-loop,并发症发生率在统计学上均无显著差异。一个endo-loop的成本为13.59英镑。如果62例使用两个endo-loop固定阑尾根部的病例改为使用一个endo-loop,将节省842.58英镑。

结论

我们的研究旨在评估使用一个或两个endo-loop的病例中并发症发生率是否不同。回顾性统计分析发现两组之间无显著差异。因此,我们建议在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用一个endo-loop来固定阑尾根部。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1991/8134709/1d62bdb7ceb3/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验