Suppr超能文献

内镜下胰管支架置入术用于特定胰腺癌患者的疼痛缓解:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Endoscopic pancreatic duct stenting for pain palliation in selected pancreatic cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Siddappa Pradeep K, Hawa Fadi, Prokop Larry J, Murad M Hassan, Abu Dayyeh Barham K, Chandrasekhara Vinay, Topazian Mark D, Bazerbachi Fateh

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor Hospital, Ypsilanti, MI, USA.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2021 Feb 3;9(2):105-114. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goab001. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abdominal pain is a debilitating symptom affecting ∼80% of pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. Pancreatic duct (PD) decompression has been reported to alleviate this pain, although this practice has not been widely adopted. We aimed to evaluate the role, efficacy, and safety of endoscopic PD decompression for palliation of PC post-prandial obstructive-type pain.

METHODS

A systematic review until 7 October 2020 was performed. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality.

RESULTS

We identified 12 publications with a total of 192 patients with PC presenting with abdominal pain, in whom PD decompression was attempted, and was successful in 167 patients (mean age 62.5 years, 58.7% males). The use of plastic stents was reported in 159 patients (95.2%). All included studies reported partial or complete improvement in pain levels after PD stenting, with an improvement rate of 93% (95% confidence interval, 79%-100%). The mean duration of pain improvement was 94 ± 16 days. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related adverse events (AEs) were post-sphincterotomy bleeding (1.8%), post-ERCP pancreatitis (0.6%), and hemosuccus pancreaticus (0.6%). AEs were not reported in two patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided PD decompression. In the 167 patients with technical success, the stent-migration and stent-occlusion rates were 3.6% and 3.0%, respectively. No AE-related mortality was reported. The methodological quality assessment showed the majority of the studies having low or unclear quality.

CONCLUSION

In this exploratory analysis, endoscopic PD drainage may be an effective and safe option in selected patients for the management of obstructive-type PC pain. However, a randomized-controlled trial is needed to delineate the role of this invasive practice.

摘要

背景

腹痛是一种使人虚弱的症状,约80%的胰腺癌(PC)患者会受到影响。据报道,胰管(PD)减压可缓解这种疼痛,尽管这种做法尚未被广泛采用。我们旨在评估内镜下PD减压对缓解PC餐后梗阻型疼痛的作用、疗效和安全性。

方法

进行了一项截至2020年10月7日的系统评价。两名独立的评审员选择研究、提取数据并评估方法学质量。

结果

我们确定了12篇出版物,共有192例伴有腹痛的PC患者尝试进行PD减压,其中167例成功(平均年龄62.5岁,男性占58.7%)。159例患者(95.2%)使用了塑料支架。所有纳入研究均报告PD支架置入术后疼痛程度部分或完全改善,改善率为93%(95%置信区间,79%-100%)。疼痛改善的平均持续时间为94±16天。内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)相关不良事件(AE)为括约肌切开术后出血(1.8%)、ERCP术后胰腺炎(0.6%)和胰腺血囊肿(0.6%)。接受内镜超声引导下PD减压的两名患者未报告AE。在技术成功的167例患者中,支架移位率和支架阻塞率分别为3.6%和3.0%。未报告与AE相关的死亡病例。方法学质量评估显示,大多数研究质量低或不明确。

结论

在这项探索性分析中,内镜下PD引流可能是部分患者管理梗阻型PC疼痛的有效且安全的选择。然而,需要进行一项随机对照试验来明确这种侵入性操作的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6bf/8128017/1433e8358d3d/goab001f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验