• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生教育活动中课程前后多项选择题评估问题两种整合方式的经验

Experiences from Two Ways of Integrating Pre- and Post-course Multiple-choice Assessment Questions in Educational Events for Surgeons.

作者信息

Ghidinelli Monica, Cunningham Michael, Monotti Isobel C, Hindocha Nishma, Rickli Alain, McVicar Iain, Glyde Mark

机构信息

AO Education Institute, AO Foundation, Duebendorf, Switzerland.

College of Veterinary Medicine/School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.

出版信息

J Eur CME. 2021 May 13;10(1):1918317. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2021.1918317.

DOI:10.1080/21614083.2021.1918317
PMID:34026323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8128219/
Abstract

To examine how to optimise the integration of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for learning in continuing professional development (CPD) events in surgery, we implemented and evaluated two methods in two subspecialities over multiple years. The same 12 MCQs were administered pre- and post-event in 66 facial trauma courses. Two different sets of 10 MCQs were administered pre- and post-event in 21 small animal fracture courses. We performed standard psychometric tests on responses from participants who completed both the pre- and post-event assessment. The average difficulty index pre-course was 57% with a discrimination index of 0.20 for small animal fractures and 53% with a discrimination index of 0.15 for facial trauma. For the majority of the individual MCQs, the scores were between 30%-70% and the discrimination index was >0.10. The difficulty index post-course increased in both groups (to 75% and 62%). The pre-course MCQs resulted in an average score in the expected range for both formats suggesting they were appropriate for the intended level of difficulty and an appropriate pre-course learning activity. Post-course completion resulted in increased scores with both formats. Both delivery methods worked well in all regions and overall quality depends on applying a solid item development and validation process.

摘要

为了研究如何在外科继续职业发展(CPD)活动中优化用于学习的多项选择题(MCQ),我们在多个亚专业中实施并评估了两种方法,历时数年。在66门面部创伤课程的课前和课后都使用了相同的12道多项选择题。在21门小动物骨折课程的课前和课后分别使用了两组不同的10道多项选择题。我们对完成了课前和课后评估的参与者的回答进行了标准心理测量测试。小动物骨折课程课前的平均难度指数为57%,区分度指数为0.20;面部创伤课程课前的平均难度指数为53%,区分度指数为0.15。对于大多数单项多项选择题,得分在30%至70%之间,区分度指数大于0.10。两组课程课后的难度指数均有所提高(分别提高到75%和62%)。课前的多项选择题在两种形式下的平均得分都在预期范围内,这表明它们适合预期的难度水平,是合适的课前学习活动。课程结束后,两种形式的得分都有所提高。两种授课方式在所有地区都效果良好,总体质量取决于应用扎实的题目开发和验证过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1c/8128219/468fc6a86437/ZJEC_A_1918317_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1c/8128219/468fc6a86437/ZJEC_A_1918317_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b1c/8128219/468fc6a86437/ZJEC_A_1918317_F0001_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Experiences from Two Ways of Integrating Pre- and Post-course Multiple-choice Assessment Questions in Educational Events for Surgeons.外科医生教育活动中课程前后多项选择题评估问题两种整合方式的经验
J Eur CME. 2021 May 13;10(1):1918317. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2021.1918317.
2
A comparison of clinical-scenario (case cluster) versus stand-alone multiple choice questions in a problem-based learning environment in undergraduate medicine.本科医学基于问题的学习环境中临床情景(病例组)与独立多项选择题的比较。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2016 Nov 11;12(1):14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2016.08.014. eCollection 2017 Feb.
3
The Effect of a One-Day Workshop on the Quality of Framing Multiple Choice Questions in Physiology in a Medical College in India.一日研讨会对印度一所医学院生理学多项选择题编制质量的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 24;15(8):e44049. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44049. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Assessment of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in the Surgery Course for an Integrated Curriculum, University of Bisha College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯比沙大学医学院综合课程外科学课程中多项选择题质量评估
Cureus. 2023 Dec 13;15(12):e50441. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50441. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Construction of Multiple Choice Questions Before and After An Educational Intervention.教育干预前后多项选择题的构建
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2017 Jan-Mar;56(205):112-116.
6
Are Multiple Choice Questions for Post Graduate Dental Entrance Examinations Spot On?-Item Analysis of MCQs in Prosthodontics in India.多选择题是否适用于牙科学位入学考试?——印度修复学多项选择题的项目分析。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Oct;110(5):455-458. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
7
MCQ tests in Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS©): Development and revision.高级创伤生命支持(ATLS©)中的多项选择题测试:开发与修订
Injury. 2016 Mar;47(3):665-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.024. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
8
Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting.减少多项选择题的选项数量:反应时间、心理测量学和标准设定。
Med Educ. 2014 Oct;48(10):1020-7. doi: 10.1111/medu.12525.
9
Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool.多项选择题的项目分析:一种评估工具的质量保证测试。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Feb;77(Suppl 1):S85-S89. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.11.007. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
10
Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions.选择题中有效干扰项数量与题目难度指数及题目区分度的关系
Cureus. 2023 Jul 26;15(7):e42492. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42492. eCollection 2023 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Methods Used to Assess Student Performance and Course Outcomes at the National Center of Excellence in Dairy Production Medicine Education for Veterinarians.用于评估国家兽医乳品生产医学卓越教育中心学生成绩和课程成果的方法。
J Vet Med Educ. 2020 Jun;47(3):263-274. doi: 10.3138/jvme.1117-162r1.
2
Application of Frequent, Spaced Multiple-choice Questions as an Educational Tool in the Pediatric Emergency Department.频繁间隔多项选择题在儿科急诊科作为一种教育工具的应用。
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Jul 9;4(2):85-93. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10366. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
Testing Test-Enhanced Continuing Medical Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
测试增强型继续医学教育测试:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Med. 2018 Nov;93(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S30-S36. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002377.
4
Plus ça change, plus c'est pareil: Making a continued case for the use of MCQs in medical education.万变不离其宗:继续为医学教育中使用多选题进行辩护。
Med Teach. 2019 May;41(5):569-577. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1505035. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
5
Planning Education for Long-Term Retention: The Cognitive Science and Implementation of Retrieval Practice.为长期记忆规划教育:认知科学与检索练习的实施
Semin Neurol. 2018 Aug;38(4):449-456. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1666983. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
6
A conceptual framework for planning and assessing learning in continuing education activities designed for clinicians in one profession and/or clinical teams.为某一专业的临床医生和/或临床团队设计的继续医学教育活动中的学习规划和评估的概念性框架。
Med Teach. 2018 Sep;40(9):904-913. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1483578. Epub 2018 Jul 28.
7
Effect of a two-day extensive continuing medical education course on participants' knowledge of clinical and operative urology.为期两天的广泛继续医学教育课程对参与者临床及手术泌尿外科知识的影响。
Turk J Urol. 2018 Nov;44(6):484-489. doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.02481.
8
Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course.兽医毒理学课程中三选项与四选项多项选择题的题目表现比较
Vet Sci. 2018 Jun 9;5(2):55. doi: 10.3390/vetsci5020055.
9
Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions at the Department of Paediatrics, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.巴林麦纳麦阿拉伯海湾大学儿科学系多项选择题的项目分析
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2018 Feb;18(1):e68-e74. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2018.18.01.011. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
10
Assessment Pearls for Competency-Based Medical Education.基于胜任力的医学教育评估要点
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Dec;9(6):688-691. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00365.1.