Ghidinelli Monica, Cunningham Michael, Monotti Isobel C, Hindocha Nishma, Rickli Alain, McVicar Iain, Glyde Mark
AO Education Institute, AO Foundation, Duebendorf, Switzerland.
College of Veterinary Medicine/School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
J Eur CME. 2021 May 13;10(1):1918317. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2021.1918317.
To examine how to optimise the integration of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for learning in continuing professional development (CPD) events in surgery, we implemented and evaluated two methods in two subspecialities over multiple years. The same 12 MCQs were administered pre- and post-event in 66 facial trauma courses. Two different sets of 10 MCQs were administered pre- and post-event in 21 small animal fracture courses. We performed standard psychometric tests on responses from participants who completed both the pre- and post-event assessment. The average difficulty index pre-course was 57% with a discrimination index of 0.20 for small animal fractures and 53% with a discrimination index of 0.15 for facial trauma. For the majority of the individual MCQs, the scores were between 30%-70% and the discrimination index was >0.10. The difficulty index post-course increased in both groups (to 75% and 62%). The pre-course MCQs resulted in an average score in the expected range for both formats suggesting they were appropriate for the intended level of difficulty and an appropriate pre-course learning activity. Post-course completion resulted in increased scores with both formats. Both delivery methods worked well in all regions and overall quality depends on applying a solid item development and validation process.
为了研究如何在外科继续职业发展(CPD)活动中优化用于学习的多项选择题(MCQ),我们在多个亚专业中实施并评估了两种方法,历时数年。在66门面部创伤课程的课前和课后都使用了相同的12道多项选择题。在21门小动物骨折课程的课前和课后分别使用了两组不同的10道多项选择题。我们对完成了课前和课后评估的参与者的回答进行了标准心理测量测试。小动物骨折课程课前的平均难度指数为57%,区分度指数为0.20;面部创伤课程课前的平均难度指数为53%,区分度指数为0.15。对于大多数单项多项选择题,得分在30%至70%之间,区分度指数大于0.10。两组课程课后的难度指数均有所提高(分别提高到75%和62%)。课前的多项选择题在两种形式下的平均得分都在预期范围内,这表明它们适合预期的难度水平,是合适的课前学习活动。课程结束后,两种形式的得分都有所提高。两种授课方式在所有地区都效果良好,总体质量取决于应用扎实的题目开发和验证过程。