Grayson Jessica W, Nayak Agnish, Winder Mark, Jonker Benjamin, Alvarado Raquel, Barham Henry, McCormack Ann, Harvey Richard J
Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, Applied Medical Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Jun;82(3):295-302. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700498. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
Despite multidisciplinary care being commonly recommended, there remains limited evidence supporting its benefits in pituitary disease management. This study aimed to assess the impact of multidisciplinary care in pituitary surgery. A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing pituitary surgery outcomes among consecutive patients within a quaternary referral center in 5 years before and after introduction of a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Primary outcomes were endocrine (transient diabetes insipidus [DI], syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone [SIADH], and new hypopituitarism) and surgical (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] leak, epistaxis, intracranial hemorrhage, and meningitis) complications, length of hospital stay, and intrasellar residual tumor. 279 patients (89 pre-MDT vs. 190 post-MDT) were assessed (age 54 ± 17 years, 48% female). Nonfunctioning adenomas were most common (54%). In the post-MDT era, more clinically functioning tumors (42 vs. 28%, = 0.03) were treated. Transient DI and SIADH occurred less often post-MDT (20 vs. 36%, < 0.01 and 18 vs. 39%, < 0.01), as well as new hypothyroidism (5 vs. 15, < 0.01). Hospital stay was shorter post-MDT (5[3] vs. 7[5] days, < 0.001) and intrasellar residuals were less common (8 vs. 35%, < 0.001). Complications were more frequent pre-MDT independent of tumor size, hormone status, and surgical technique (odds ratio [OR] = 2.14 [1.05-4.32], = 0.04). Outcomes of pituitary surgery improved after the introduction of an MDT. Pituitary MDTs may benefit both patients and the health system by improving quality of care and reducing hospital stays.
尽管多学科护理通常被推荐,但支持其在垂体疾病管理中益处的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估多学科护理在垂体手术中的影响。
进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了在引入多学科团队(MDT)之前和之后5年内,四级转诊中心连续患者的垂体手术结果。主要结局包括内分泌(短暂性尿崩症[DI]、抗利尿激素分泌不当综合征[SIADH]和新发垂体功能减退)和手术(脑脊液[CSF]漏、鼻出血、颅内出血和脑膜炎)并发症、住院时间和鞍内残余肿瘤。
评估了279例患者(MDT前89例,MDT后190例)(年龄54±17岁,48%为女性)。无功能性腺瘤最为常见(54%)。在MDT时代之后,治疗了更多具有临床功能的肿瘤(42%对28%,P = 0.03)。MDT后短暂性DI和SIADH的发生率较低(20%对36%,P < 0.01和18%对39%,P < 0.01),新发甲状腺功能减退也是如此(5%对15%,P < 0.01)。MDT后住院时间较短(5[3]天对7[5]天,P < 0.001),鞍内残余较少见(8%对35%,P < 0.001)。MDT前并发症更频繁,与肿瘤大小、激素状态和手术技术无关(优势比[OR]=2.14[1.05 - 4.32],P = 0.04)。
引入MDT后垂体手术的结果得到改善。垂体MDT可能通过提高护理质量和缩短住院时间,使患者和卫生系统都受益。