Yacoub Abraam, Schneider Daniel, Ali Ahmed, Wimmer Wilhelm, Caversaccio Marco, Anschuetz Lukas
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Jun;82(3):357-364. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3399553. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
This study was aimed to propose an expanded endoscopic-assisted lateral approach to the infratemporal fossa (ITF) and compare its area of exposure and surgical freedom with the endoscopic endonasal transptergyoid approach (EETA). Anatomical dissections were performed in five cadaver heads (10 sides). The ITF was first examined through the endoscopically assisted lateral corridor, herein referred to as the endoscopic-assisted transtemporal fossa approach (TTFA). After that, the EETA was performed and coupled with two sequential maxillary procedures (medial maxillectomy [MM], and endoscopic-assisted Denker's approach [DA]). Using the stereotactic neuronavigation, measurements of the area of exposure and surgical freedom at the foramen ovale were determined for the previously mentioned approaches. Bimanual exploration of the ITF through the endoscopic-assisted lateral approach was achieved in all specimens. The DA (729 ± 49 mm ) provided a larger area of exposure than MM (568 ± 46 mm ; 0.0001). However, areas of exposure were similar between the DA and the TTFA (677 ± 35 mm ; = 0.09). The surgical freedom offered by the TTFA (109.3 ± 19 cm ) was much greater than the DA (24.7 ± 4.8 cm ; 0.0001), and the MM (15.2 ± 3.2 cm , 0.0001). The study demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed approach to provide direct access to the extreme extensions of the ITF. The lateral corridor offers an ideal working area in the posterior compartment of the ITF without crossing over important neurovascular structures. The new technique may be used alone in selected primary ITF lesions or in combination with endonasal approaches in pathologies spreading laterally from the nose or nasopharynx.
本研究旨在提出一种扩大的内镜辅助颞下窝外侧入路,并将其暴露面积和手术自由度与内镜经鼻经翼突入路(EETA)进行比较。在5个尸头(10侧)上进行解剖。首先通过内镜辅助外侧通道检查颞下窝,在此称为内镜辅助经颞下窝入路(TTFA)。之后,进行EETA并结合两个连续的上颌手术(内侧上颌骨切除术[MM]和内镜辅助邓克手术[DA])。使用立体定向神经导航,确定上述入路在卵圆孔处的暴露面积和手术自由度。通过内镜辅助外侧入路对所有标本的颞下窝进行了双手探查。DA(729±49mm²)提供的暴露面积大于MM(568±46mm²;P<0.0001)。然而,DA和TTFA之间的暴露面积相似(677±35mm²;P = 0.09)。TTFA提供的手术自由度(109.3±19cm³)远大于DA(24.7±4.8cm³;P<0.0001)和MM(15.2±3.2cm³,P<0.0001)。该研究证明了所提出的入路直接进入颞下窝最远端的可行性。外侧通道在颞下窝后间隙提供了一个理想的工作区域,而无需穿过重要的神经血管结构。新技术可单独用于选定的原发性颞下窝病变,或与鼻内入路联合用于从鼻腔或鼻咽侧向扩散的病变。