Department of Nephrology, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
PLoS One. 2021 May 25;16(5):e0252237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252237. eCollection 2021.
Prevalence of cognitive impairment increases with worsening severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and majority of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients on dialysis have cognitive impairment. Trends of cognitive function (CF) in this population are less well known with published studies reporting conflicting results.
We assessed CF in a cohort of non-dialysis CKD and ESKD patients undergoing dialysis using modified mini-mental state examination (3MS), trail-making test (TMT-A & B) scores and Stroop task, and evaluated demographics, comorbidities and depression using Beck depression inventory at baseline. We repeated tests of CF and depression ≥ 1-year after baseline in both groups and compared change scores in CF and depression between ESKD/ CKD sub-groups. Among ESKD patients we compared change scores between patients with dialysis vintage of <1-year and >1-year. Analysis of covariance was used to adjust for the effect of age on these change scores.
At baseline (N = 211), compared to CKD (N = 108), ESKD (N = 103) patients had significantly worse CF based on 3MS and TMT-A & B scores, and depression scores. On follow-up (N = 160) 3MS scores, especially the memory subscale significantly improved in ESKD, but worsened in CKD, with no significant changes in TMT A /TMT-B, or depression scores after adjusting for age. Among ESKD patients, 3MS, especially memory subscale improved in patients with dialysis vintage <1-year compared to >1-year. The 51 patients who discontinued after baseline assessment had worse baseline CF scores suggesting differential attrition.
Though baseline cognitive scores were worse in ESKD patients on dialysis, compared to CKD, their 3MS, especially memory subscale improved on follow-up. Among ESKD patients, the improvement was significant only in patients who have been on dialysis for less than one-year which may indicate a beneficial effect of clearance of uraemic toxins. Differential attrition of study subjects may have impacted the observed results.
随着慢性肾脏病(CKD)严重程度的恶化,认知障碍的患病率会增加,大多数接受透析的终末期肾脏病(ESKD)患者都存在认知障碍。该人群的认知功能(CF)趋势知之甚少,已发表的研究结果相互矛盾。
我们使用改良的简易精神状态检查(3MS)、连线测试(TMT-A 和 B)评分和斯特鲁普任务评估了非透析性 CKD 和正在接受透析的 ESKD 患者的 CF,并用贝克抑郁量表评估了基线时的人口统计学、合并症和抑郁情况。我们在两组患者中至少 1 年后重复 CF 和抑郁测试,并比较 ESKD/CKD 亚组之间 CF 和抑郁的变化分数。在 ESKD 患者中,我们比较了透析龄<1 年和>1 年的患者之间的变化分数。协方差分析用于调整年龄对这些变化分数的影响。
在基线时(N = 211),与 CKD(N = 108)相比,ESKD(N = 103)患者的 3MS 和 TMT-A&B 评分以及抑郁评分明显较差。在随访时(N = 160),ESKD 患者的 3MS 评分,特别是记忆子量表明显改善,但 CKD 患者的评分恶化,调整年龄后 TMT A/TMT-B 或抑郁评分无明显变化。在 ESKD 患者中,与透析龄>1 年的患者相比,透析龄<1 年的患者的 3MS,特别是记忆子量表有所改善。与基线评估后停止的 51 名患者相比,这些患者的基线 CF 评分较差,提示存在差异性失访。
尽管与 CKD 相比,透析的 ESKD 患者的基线认知评分更差,但他们的 3MS,特别是记忆子量表在随访中有所改善。在 ESKD 患者中,只有透析时间不到一年的患者的改善具有统计学意义,这可能表明清除尿毒症毒素具有有益作用。研究对象的差异性失访可能影响了观察到的结果。