Department of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Department of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
J Pain. 2021 Nov;22(11):1429-1451. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 May 24.
Native Americans (NAs) experience higher rates of chronic pain than the general U.S. population, but the risk factors for this pain disparity are unknown. NAs also experience high rates of stressors and cardiovascular and metabolic health disparities (eg, diabetes, cardiovascular disease) consistent with allostatic load (stress-related wear-and-tear on homeostatic systems). Given that allostatic load is associated with chronic pain, then allostatic load may contribute to their pain disparity. Data from 302 healthy, pain-free men and women (153 NAs, 149 non-Hispanic Whites [NHW]) were analyzed using structural equation modeling to determine whether cardiometabolic allostatic load (body mass index, blood pressure, heart rate variability) mediated the relationship between NA ethnicity and experimental measures of pronociceptive processes: temporal summation of pain (TS-pain) and the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR), conditioned pain modulation of pain (CPM-pain) and NFR (CPM-NFR), and pain tolerance. Results indicated that NAs experienced greater cardiometabolic allostatic load that was related to enhanced TS-NFR and impaired CPM-NFR. Cardiometabolic allostatic load was unrelated to measures of pain perception (CPM-pain, TS-pain, pain sensitivity). This suggests cardiometabolic allostatic load may promote spinal sensitization in healthy NAs, that is not concomitant with pain sensitization, perhaps representing a unique pain risk phenotype in NAs. PERSPECTIVE: Healthy, pain-free Native Americans experienced greater cardiometabolic allostatic load that was associated with a pronociceptive pain phenotype indicative of latent spinal sensitization (ie, spinal sensitization not associated with hyperalgesia). This latent spinal sensitization could represent a pain risk phenotype for this population.
美国原住民(NAs)经历慢性疼痛的比率高于美国一般人群,但造成这种疼痛差异的风险因素尚不清楚。NAs 还经历着较高的压力和心血管及代谢健康方面的差异(例如,糖尿病、心血管疾病),这些都与全身适应综合征(与体内平衡系统相关的压力相关的磨损)一致。鉴于全身适应综合征与慢性疼痛相关,那么全身适应综合征可能导致他们的疼痛差异。使用结构方程模型对 302 名健康、无痛的男性和女性(153 名 NAs,149 名非西班牙裔白人 [NHW])的数据进行了分析,以确定心脏代谢性全身适应负荷(体重指数、血压、心率变异性)是否介导了 NA 族裔与实验性伤害感受过程测量值之间的关系:疼痛的时间总和(TS-pain)和伤害性屈肌反射(TS-NFR)、疼痛的条件性疼痛调制(CPM-pain)和 NFR(CPM-NFR)以及疼痛耐受力。结果表明,NAs 经历了更大的心脏代谢性全身适应负荷,这与增强的 TS-NFR 和受损的 CPM-NFR 有关。心脏代谢性全身适应负荷与疼痛感知测量值(CPM-pain、TS-pain、疼痛敏感性)无关。这表明心脏代谢性全身适应负荷可能促进健康 NAs 中的脊髓敏化,而不会伴随疼痛敏化,这可能代表 NAs 中独特的疼痛风险表型。观点:健康、无痛的美国原住民经历了更大的心脏代谢性全身适应负荷,这与预示潜在脊髓敏化的伤害感受表型有关(即,与痛觉过敏无关的脊髓敏化)。这种潜在的脊髓敏化可能代表该人群的疼痛风险表型。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022-10
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020-4
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2020-6
Health Serv Res. 2019-10-27