Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico.
Department of Social Work, Oglala Lakota College.
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2020 Jun;57(2):184-196. doi: 10.1037/pst0000267. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
American Indians face pervasive trauma exposure, collective histories of communal suffering, and elevated risk for depression and posttraumatic stress disorder. In addition to socioeconomic barriers, access to culturally responsive treatment is limited, which may compromise treatment engagement. The study piloted the Historical Trauma and Unresolved Grief Intervention (HTUG), combined with Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT), to reduce symptoms of depression and related trauma and grief. The study hypothesized that HTUG + IPT would lead to greater group engagement and decreased depression and related symptoms compared with IPT-Only. American Indian adults ( = 52) were randomized into one of two 12-session interventions, HTUG + IPT or IPT-Only, at two tribal sites: one Northern Plains reservation ( = 26) and one Southwest urban clinic ( = 26). Standardized measures assessed depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, grief, trauma, and substance use. Data were collected at screening, baseline, end of intervention, and 8 weeks postintervention; depression and group engagement measures were also collected at Weeks 4 and 8 of the intervention. Depression scores significantly decreased for both treatments, but there were no significant differences in depression between the two groups: IPT-Only (30.2 ± 6.4 at baseline to 16.7 ± 12.1 at follow-up) and HTUG + IPT (30.2 ± 8.1 at baseline to 19.9 ± 8.8 at follow-up). However, HTUG + IPT participants demonstrated significantly greater group engagement. Postintervention, clinicians expressed preference for HTUG + IPT based upon qualitative observations of greater perceived gains among participants. Given the degree of trauma exposure in tribal communities, these findings in a relatively small sample suggest HTUG should be further examined in context of treatment engagement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
美洲印第安人普遍经历过创伤,有着共同的苦难历史,并且面临着更高的抑郁和创伤后应激障碍风险。除了社会经济障碍外,获得文化响应的治疗机会有限,这可能会影响治疗的参与度。该研究试点了历史创伤和未解决的悲伤干预(HTUG),结合团体人际心理治疗(IPT),以减轻抑郁和相关创伤和悲伤的症状。该研究假设 HTUG+IPT 与单独的 IPT 相比,会导致更大的群体参与度,降低抑郁和相关症状。在两个部落地点:一个北部平原保留地(n=26)和一个西南部城市诊所(n=26),将美洲印第安成年参与者(n=52)随机分配到两种 12 节干预措施之一,HTUG+IPT 或 IPT-Only。使用标准化措施评估抑郁、创伤后应激障碍、悲伤、创伤和物质使用。数据在筛选、基线、干预结束和干预后 8 周收集;在干预的第 4 周和第 8 周还收集了抑郁和群体参与度的测量。两种治疗方法的抑郁评分都显著降低,但两组之间的抑郁评分没有显著差异:IPT-Only(基线时为 30.2±6.4,随访时为 16.7±12.1)和 HTUG+IPT(基线时为 30.2±8.1,随访时为 19.9±8.8)。然而,HTUG+IPT 参与者表现出了更大的群体参与度。干预后,临床医生根据参与者感知到的更大收益的定性观察,表达了对 HTUG+IPT 的偏好。鉴于部落社区中创伤暴露的程度,在一个相对较小的样本中,这些发现表明 HTUG 应该在治疗参与的背景下进一步研究。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2020-6
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018-10
J Trauma Stress. 2024-12
Curr Addict Rep. 2023-12
Int J Group Psychother. 2017-4
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018-12
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018-3
Am J Community Psychol. 2017-12-21
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016-10-13
Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2016
Am J Psychiatry. 2015-5