• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用行政索赔评估医疗保险优势健康计划患者肿瘤多基因panel 检测趋势的新方法。

Novel Approach Using Administrative Claims to Evaluate Trends in Oncology Multigene Panel Testing for Patients Enrolled in Medicare Advantage Health Plans.

机构信息

Humana Healthcare Research Inc, Louisville, KY.

Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 May 5;5. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00422. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1200/PO.20.00422
PMID:34036226
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8140791/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop an approach to identify and evaluate recent use of multigene panel testing over time.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective database analysis using medical and pharmacy claims data. Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan members diagnosed with select malignant solid tumors were identified. The pattern of somatic genetic testing for each patient was evaluated from January 2016 through December 2018. Tests were classified by the number of genes tested in the panel: < 50 (small or medium) and ≥ 50 (large).

RESULTS

An initial feasibility study using our novel approach for identifying panel tests resulted in 2.4 and 1.2 times more large and medium panels, respectively, identified compared with using procedure codes alone. A total of 121,675 eligible patients were identified, with 131,915 unique cancer cases. Overall, 5,457 (4.5%) patients received any panel test from 2016 to 2018. We found the number of tests performed each quarter increased from 238 in Q1 of 2016 to 755 in Q4 of 2018. The highest number of cases were genitourinary cancers; however, the highest proportion of cancer-related genetic testing was among patients with respiratory cancer. Across all tumor types, the proportion of large-panel tests performed as a function of all multigene panel tests increased from 20.7% of tests in Q1 of 2016 to 46.4% of tests in Q4 of 2018. The three cancer categories with the highest count of cancer-related panel tests, respiratory cancer, GI cancer, and female reproductive cancer, had a consistently greater proportion receiving a panel test at any point postindex.

CONCLUSION

Across a variety of cancers, use of somatic, large-panel cancer-related genetic testing, as a proportion of all somatic cancer-related genetic testing, increased from 2016 to 2018, although testing overall was low.

摘要

目的

开发一种方法来识别和评估随时间推移多基因面板检测的近期使用情况。

方法

我们使用医疗和药房索赔数据进行了回顾性数据库分析。确定了在选定的恶性实体瘤中诊断出的医疗保险优势处方药计划成员。从 2016 年 1 月到 2018 年 12 月,评估了每位患者的体细胞遗传检测模式。根据面板中检测的基因数量对测试进行分类:<50(小或中)和≥50(大)。

结果

使用我们用于识别面板测试的新方法进行的初步可行性研究导致分别确定了大面板和中面板的数量增加了 2.4 倍和 1.2 倍,而单独使用程序代码则分别增加了 2.4 倍和 1.2 倍。确定了 121,675 名合格患者,有 131,915 个独特的癌症病例。总体而言,2016 年至 2018 年间,有 5,457(4.5%)名患者接受了任何面板测试。我们发现,每个季度进行的测试数量从 2016 年第一季度的 238 个增加到 2018 年第四季度的 755 个。病例数量最多的是泌尿生殖系统癌症;然而,与呼吸癌症相关的遗传检测比例最高。在所有肿瘤类型中,大面板测试作为所有多基因面板测试的一部分的比例从 2016 年第一季度的测试的 20.7%增加到 2018 年第四季度的测试的 46.4%。与癌症相关的面板测试数量最高的三个癌症类别(呼吸癌、胃肠道癌和女性生殖系统癌)在指数后任何时候接受面板测试的比例始终更高。

结论

在各种癌症中,作为所有与癌症相关的体细胞遗传测试的一部分,大面板的体细胞遗传检测的使用比例从 2016 年到 2018 年有所增加,尽管总体测试数量较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89d0/8140791/f710823b1177/po-5-po.20.00422-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89d0/8140791/a688a33b56eb/po-5-po.20.00422-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89d0/8140791/f9def85a7d56/po-5-po.20.00422-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89d0/8140791/67bad12be3c0/po-5-po.20.00422-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89d0/8140791/f710823b1177/po-5-po.20.00422-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89d0/8140791/a688a33b56eb/po-5-po.20.00422-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89d0/8140791/f9def85a7d56/po-5-po.20.00422-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89d0/8140791/67bad12be3c0/po-5-po.20.00422-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89d0/8140791/f710823b1177/po-5-po.20.00422-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Novel Approach Using Administrative Claims to Evaluate Trends in Oncology Multigene Panel Testing for Patients Enrolled in Medicare Advantage Health Plans.利用行政索赔评估医疗保险优势健康计划患者肿瘤多基因panel 检测趋势的新方法。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 May 5;5. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00422. eCollection 2021.
2
Economic burden in direct costs of concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma in a Medicare Advantage population.医疗保险优势人群中慢性阻塞性肺疾病和哮喘并存的直接成本经济负担。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Mar;14(2):176-85. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.2.176.
3
Low-Cost Generic Program Use by Medicare Beneficiaries: Implications for Medication Exposure Misclassification in Administrative Claims Data.医疗保险受益人的低成本通用药物计划使用:对行政索赔数据中药物暴露错误分类的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jun;22(6):741-51. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.6.741.
4
Predictors of Nonadherence to Topical Intraocular Pressure Reduction Medications Among Medicare Members: A Claims-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.医疗保险患者中局部降眼压药物治疗依从性的预测因素:基于理赔的回顾性队列研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jul;22(7):808-817a. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.808.
5
Evaluation of Patient Migration Patterns and Related Health Care Costs Within a National Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan After Implementation of an Oxycodone HCl Extended-Release Access Restriction.评估在阿片类药物盐酸羟考酮缓释片获取受限政策实施后全国医疗保险优势处方药计划内患者迁移模式和相关医疗费用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Aug;23(8):902-912. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.16307. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
6
Generic drug discount programs: are prescriptions being submitted for pharmacy benefit adjudication?仿制药折扣计划:是否有处方被提交用于药房福利裁决?
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(9):690-700. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.9.690.
7
Trends in opioid use in commercially insured and Medicare Advantage populations in 2007-16: retrospective cohort study.2007-16 年商业保险和医疗保险优势人群中阿片类药物使用趋势:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2018 Aug 1;362:k2833. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2833.
8
Prevalence and Cost of Subsequent Fractures Among U.S. Patients with an Incident Fracture.美国初次骨折患者后续骨折的发生率和成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Apr;23(4):461-471. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.4.461.
9
Cost of self-monitoring of blood glucose in the United States among patients on an insulin regimen for diabetes.美国糖尿病胰岛素治疗患者的血糖自我监测成本。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):21-32. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.1.21.
10
Sensitivity of administrative claims to identify incident cases of lung cancer: a comparison of 3 health plans.行政索赔识别肺癌新发病例的敏感性:3个健康计划的比较
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Oct;15(8):659-68. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.8.659.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of an algorithm to identify small cell lung cancer patients in claims databases.开发一种在理赔数据库中识别小细胞肺癌患者的算法。
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 15;14:1358562. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1358562. eCollection 2024.
2
Trends and Clinical Characteristics of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Genetic Panel Tests: An Analysis of Korean Nationwide Claims Data.基于下一代测序的基因Panel 检测的趋势和临床特征:韩国全国索赔数据分析。
Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan;56(1):27-36. doi: 10.4143/crt.2023.844. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
ALK Testing Trends and Patterns Among Community Practices in the United States.美国社区医疗机构中ALK检测的趋势与模式
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018 Nov;2:1-11. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00159.
2
Utilization Trends and Factors Associated With ROS1 Testing Among Patients With Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer in US Community Practices.美国社区实践中晚期非小细胞肺癌患者 ROS1 检测的利用趋势及相关因素。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2021 May;22(3):e470-e480. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
3
Value of Precision Medicine in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Outcomes Associated with the Use of Companion Diagnostics.
利用真实世界数据分析精准医学的应用:一项范围综述
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):557. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040557.
精准医学在晚期非小细胞肺癌中的价值:伴随诊断应用相关的真实世界结局。
Oncologist. 2020 Nov;25(11):e1743-e1752. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0864. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
4
Insights From a Temporal Assessment of Increases in US Private Payer Coverage of Tumor Sequencing From 2015 to 2019.从 2015 年到 2019 年美国私人支付者对肿瘤测序覆盖范围增加的时间评估中得到的见解。
Value Health. 2020 May;23(5):551-558. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
5
Review of precision cancer medicine: Evolution of the treatment paradigm.精准肿瘤医学述评:治疗范式的演变。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2020 Jun;86:102019. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102019. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
6
Genetic testing utilization for patients with neurologic disease and the limitations of claims data.神经系统疾病患者的基因检测应用及索赔数据的局限性
Neurol Genet. 2020 Feb 26;6(2):e405. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000405. eCollection 2020 Apr.
7
Biomarker Testing for Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Issues and Tough Choices.晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的生物标志物检测:现实世界中的问题与艰难抉择
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:531-542. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_237863. Epub 2019 May 17.
8
Complexity of genome sequencing and reporting: Next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies and implementation of precision medicine in real life.基因组测序和报告的复杂性:下一代测序(NGS)技术和精准医学在现实生活中的应用。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019 Jan;133:171-182. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
9
Association of Broad-Based Genomic Sequencing With Survival Among Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Community Oncology Setting.社区肿瘤学环境中广泛基于基因组测序与晚期非小细胞肺癌患者生存的关联。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 7;320(5):469-477. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9824.
10
Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Benefit From Genome-Driven Oncology.估算接受基于基因组的肿瘤学治疗的美国癌症患者的百分比。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;4(8):1093-1098. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1660.