• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗中等大小肾结石的比较。

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus shock wave lithotripsy for the medium-sized renal stones.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, University of Sichuan, Chengdu, China.

Department of Urology, Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.

出版信息

Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Apr;73(2):187-195. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04185-0.

DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04185-0
PMID:34036766
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Miniperc) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for medium-sized renal stones.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature search was performed in February 2020 using the Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase. The outcome measurements between two procedures were stone-free rates (SFR), complication rates, operative time, hospitalization stay time, re-treatment rate, auxiliary procedures rate and efficiency quotient. Results were pooled by Review Manager version 5.3 software.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Seven studies on 936 patients (N.=471 for SWL and N.=465 for Miniperc) were included. Miniperc was associated with a higher SFR (OR: 0.25; P<0.00001). In addition, we performed a subgroup analyses for pediatric renal stones and lower pole stones, pooled results also favored Miniperc for higher SFR. SWL was associated with higher auxiliary procedure (OR: 3.32; P<0.00001), higher re-treatment rate (OR: 19.19; P<0.00001) and lower EQ (OR: 0.18; P=0.0003) compared with Miniperc. Besides, SWL was associated with a lower complication rate (OR: 0.36; P=0.0001), shorter operative time (WMD: -34.01; P<0.00001), fluoroscopy time (WMD: -134.48; P<0.00001) and hospital time (WMD: -49.11; P<0.00001) compared with Miniperc.

CONCLUSIONS

Miniperc offers a significantly higher SFR, lower auxiliary procedure and re-treatment rate, but SWL was associated with fewer complications.

摘要

介绍

本研究旨在评估微创经皮肾镜取石术(Miniperc)和体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗中等大小肾结石的临床效果。

证据获取

2020 年 2 月,我们通过 Pubmed、Web of Science 和 Embase 进行了文献检索。两种方法的主要疗效指标是结石清除率(SFR)、并发症发生率、手术时间、住院时间、再次治疗率、辅助治疗率和效率指数。结果通过 Review Manager 版本 5.3 软件进行汇总。

证据综合

共纳入 7 项研究 936 例患者(SWL 组 N=471,Miniperc 组 N=465)。Miniperc 组的 SFR 更高(OR:0.25;P<0.00001)。此外,我们还对儿童肾结石和下极肾结石进行了亚组分析,汇总结果也显示 Miniperc 组的 SFR 更高。SWL 组的辅助治疗率(OR:3.32;P<0.00001)、再次治疗率(OR:19.19;P<0.00001)和效率指数(OR:0.18;P=0.0003)均低于 Miniperc 组。此外,SWL 组的并发症发生率(OR:0.36;P=0.0001)、手术时间(WMD:-34.01;P<0.00001)、透视时间(WMD:-134.48;P<0.00001)和住院时间(WMD:-49.11;P<0.00001)均短于 Miniperc 组。

结论

Miniperc 组结石清除率更高,辅助治疗率和再次治疗率更低,但 SWL 组并发症发生率更低。

相似文献

1
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus shock wave lithotripsy for the medium-sized renal stones.经皮肾镜碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗中等大小肾结石的比较。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Apr;73(2):187-195. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04185-0.
2
Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review.体外冲击波碎石术、经皮肾镜取石术和逆行性肾内手术治疗小儿上尿路结石的最佳治疗方法:系统评价。
BMC Urol. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0520-2.
3
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for high-density, renal stones: a prospective, randomised trial.经皮肾镜碎石术是治疗高密度肾结石的一种安全替代体外冲击波碎石术的方法:一项前瞻性、随机试验。
BJU Int. 2021 Dec;128(6):744-751. doi: 10.1111/bju.15493. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
4
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术及体外冲击波碎石术治疗下极肾结石的Meta分析和系统评价
J Endourol. 2015 Jul;29(7):745-59. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0799. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
5
The best treatment approach for lower calyceal stones ≤20 mm in maximal diameter: mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or shock wave lithotripsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature conducted by the European Section of Uro-Technology and Young Academic Urologists.对于最大直径≤20 毫米的下盏结石,最佳治疗方法是:微创经皮肾镜碎石术、逆行肾内手术或体外冲击波碎石术。由欧洲泌尿外科技术分会和青年泌尿外科医生进行的系统评价和文献荟萃分析。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Dec;73(6):711-723. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04388-3. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
6
Comparison of Micro-Percutaneous and Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微通道经皮肾镜取石术与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2021 Oct 4;8:743017. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.743017. eCollection 2021.
7
Endourologic Management (PCNL, URS, SWL) of Stones in Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Young Academic Urologists and Uro-Technology Groups.经皮肾镜取石术、输尿管镜碎石取石术、体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立肾结石的腔内泌尿外科管理:欧洲泌尿外科学会青年学者泌尿外科学组和泌尿技术组的系统评价。
J Endourol. 2020 Jan;34(1):7-17. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0455. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
8
Management of large renal stones with super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an international multicentre comparative study.采用超微经皮肾镜碎石术治疗大肾结石的管理:一项国际多中心对比研究。
BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):168-176. doi: 10.1111/bju.15066. Epub 2020 May 25.
9
A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience.一项前瞻性、随机对照研究比较了冲击波碎石术、逆行肾内手术和 miniperc 治疗 1 至 2cm 透光性下盏肾结石:单中心经验。
J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):160-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.088. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
10
Lower calyceal and renal pelvic stones in preschool children: A comparative study of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.学龄前儿童下盏及肾盂结石:微创经皮肾镜取石术与体外冲击波碎石术的对比研究
Int J Urol. 2016 Jul;23(7):564-70. doi: 10.1111/iju.13093. Epub 2016 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of frailty on perioperative outcomes following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in older persons: evidence from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample.衰弱对老年人经皮肾镜取石术围手术期结局的影响:来自美国全国住院患者样本的证据。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Jun 19;52(1):95. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01595-y.
2
Scoping review of recent evidence on the management of pediatric urolithiasis: summary of meta-analyses, systematic reviews and relevant randomized controlled trials.近期小儿尿石症管理的循证医学研究范围综述:荟萃分析、系统评价和相关随机对照试验的总结。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Oct;38(10):1349-1361. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05190-3. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
3
Presence of a Novel Anatomical Structure May Cause Bleeding When Using the Calyx Access in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
在微创经皮肾镜取石术中使用肾盏入路时,一种新型解剖结构的存在可能导致出血。
Front Surg. 2022 Jun 21;9:942147. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.942147. eCollection 2022.