Department of Biology, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, California State University Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA.
Integr Comp Biol. 2021 Sep 8;61(2):655-667. doi: 10.1093/icb/icab099.
Spines are ubiquitous in both plants and animals, and while most spines were likely originally used for defense, over time many have been modified in a variety of ways. Here we take an integrative approach to review the form, function, and evolution of spines as a defensive strategy in order to make new connections between physical mechanisms and functional behavior. While this review focuses on spines in mammals, we reference and draw ideas from the literature on spines in other taxa, including plants. We begin by exploring the biomechanics of defensive spines, their varied functions, and nondefensive modifications. We pay particular attention to the mechanics involved in passive puncture and the ways organisms have overcome limitations associated with the low energy input. We then focus on the ecological, physiological, and behavioral factors that promote the evolution of spiny defenses, including predator- and habitat-mediated hypotheses. While there is considerable evidence to support both, studies have generally found that (1) defensive spines are usually effective against one class of attacker (e.g., larger predators) but ineffective against or even facilitate predation by others and (2) species that are more visible or exposed to predators are under much stronger selection to evolve defensive spines or some other robust defense. What type of defensive morphology that evolves, however, is less predictable and probably strongly dependent on both the dominant source of predation and the habitat structure of the organism (e.g., arboreal, terrestrial, and fossorial). We then explore traits that often are correlated with defensive spines and armor, potentially forming armor syndromes, suites of traits that evolve together with body armor in a correlated fashion. In mammals, these include aposematic warning coloration, locomotion style, diet, metabolic rate, and relative brain size. Finally, we encourage integration of mechanistic, behavioral, and evolutionary studies of defensive spines and suggest future avenues of research in the biomechanics, evolution, and behavior of spines and spiny organisms.
脊椎在植物和动物中普遍存在,虽然大多数刺最初可能是用于防御的,但随着时间的推移,许多刺已经以各种方式发生了改变。在这里,我们采用综合的方法来回顾刺作为防御策略的形式、功能和进化,以便在物理机制和功能行为之间建立新的联系。虽然本综述主要关注哺乳动物的刺,但我们参考并借鉴了其他分类群(包括植物)刺的文献中的观点和想法。我们首先探讨了防御性刺的生物力学、它们的各种功能以及非防御性的改变。我们特别关注被动穿刺所涉及的力学原理,以及生物体克服与低能量输入相关的限制的方法。然后,我们专注于促进刺状防御进化的生态、生理和行为因素,包括捕食者和栖息地介导的假说。虽然有相当多的证据支持这两种假说,但研究通常发现:(1)防御性刺通常对一类攻击者(例如较大的捕食者)有效,但对其他捕食者无效甚至有助于捕食;(2)那些更显眼或更容易受到捕食者攻击的物种,受到更强烈的选择压力,以进化出防御性刺或其他更强大的防御机制。然而,进化出哪种防御形态的预测性较差,而且可能强烈依赖于捕食的主要来源和生物体的栖息地结构(例如,树栖、陆生和穴居)。然后,我们探讨了与防御性刺和盔甲相关的特征,这些特征可能形成盔甲综合征,即与身体盔甲一起进化的一系列相关特征。在哺乳动物中,这些特征包括警戒色、运动方式、饮食、代谢率和相对脑大小。最后,我们鼓励对防御性刺和有刺生物的力学、行为和进化研究进行整合,并提出了在刺和有刺生物的生物力学、进化和行为方面的未来研究途径。