Brownlee G A, Goss D A
College of Optometry, Northeastern State University, Tahlequah, OK 74464.
J Am Optom Assoc. 1988 Jun;59(6):451-60.
Associated phorias were measured on 89 subjects using various commercially available devices to compare the results obtained with them. An additional 14 persons served as subjects to compare fixation disparity curve parameters obtained with two different targets. Distance associated phorias using the Mallett unit and the American Optical vectographic slide were not significantly different. Nearpoint associated phorias using the Bernell unit and the Borish card were not significantly different. Associated phorias obtained with the Bernell unit and the Borish card were lower in magnitude than the associated phorias (x-intercepts) from fixation disparity curves derived using the Sheedy disparometer. Fixation disparity curve parameters using the Wesson fixation disparity card differ from those obtained with the Sheedy disparometer. Subjective comments on the clinical use of each of these instruments are included.
使用各种市售设备对89名受试者测量了联合隐斜,以比较用这些设备获得的结果。另外14人作为受试者,以比较用两种不同视标获得的注视差异曲线参数。使用马利特单位和美国光学矢量图幻灯片测量的远距离联合隐斜无显著差异。使用伯内尔单位和博里什卡片测量的近点联合隐斜无显著差异。用伯内尔单位和博里什卡片获得的联合隐斜幅度低于使用希迪隐斜计得出的注视差异曲线的联合隐斜(x轴截距)。使用韦森注视差异卡片得出的注视差异曲线参数与使用希迪隐斜计获得的参数不同。文中还包括了对这些仪器临床应用的主观评价。